From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 12 13:56:37 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2012 17:56:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41321 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TMjTQ-00041q-RI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:56:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34144) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TMjMt-0003rI-Bu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:49:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMjLy-0001jy-88 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:48:55 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:46376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMjLy-0001ju-4k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:48:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMjLx-0002aB-8M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:48:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMjLw-0001ji-9a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:48:53 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:46346) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMjLv-0001jZ-Vn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:48:52 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2012 17:48:50 -0000 Received: from p5795AC8D.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO boo.workgroup) [87.149.172.141] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 12 Oct 2012 19:48:50 +0200 X-Authenticated: #19296480 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+1ta0ZSdm15URtIlzkUNS9sWqox221N95yoAdR3O ev1/jMh/cHZB18 Received: from grfz by boo.workgroup with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TMjLo-0006Fk-Kh; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:48:44 +0200 From: Gregor Zattler To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.2.50; [Doc][PATCH] Neither `what-line' nor `count-lines' do call the respectiv other in recent GNU/Emacs. Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:48:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87wqyvtwcj.fsf@boo.workgroup> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:56:35 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Dear Emacs developers, is "Introduction to Programming in Emacs Lisp" written by Robert J. Chassell, still updated? There is an error in it, this patch corrects it. --- doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi index 04e3e0c..6d3a5d0 100644 --- a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi +++ b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi @@ -6600,10 +6600,9 @@ buffer; or conversely, an Emacs Lisp function needs to work on all of a buffer that has been narrowed. The @code{what-line} function, for example, removes the narrowing from a buffer, if it has any narrowing and when it has finished its job, restores the narrowing to what it was. -On the other hand, the @code{count-lines} function, which is called by -@code{what-line}, uses narrowing to restrict itself to just that portion -of the buffer in which it is interested and then restores the previous -situation. +On the other hand, the @code{count-lines} function uses narrowing to +restrict itself to just that portion of the buffer in which it is +interested and then restores the previous situation. @node save-restriction @section The @code{save-restriction} Special Form -- 1.7.10.4 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 12 22:24:20 2012 Received: (at 12629-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2012 02:24:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41675 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TMrOl-0000MK-NZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:24:20 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:35038 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TMrOk-0000MC-BZ for 12629-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:24:19 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMrNs-0001Uh-BD; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:23:24 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 12629-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#12629: 24.2.50; [Doc][PATCH] Neither `what-line' nor `count-lines' do call the respectiv other in recent GNU/Emacs. References: <87wqyvtwcj.fsf@boo.workgroup> X-Spook: Lexis-Nexis rail gun Firefly colonel Reno Serbian mania X-Ran: BC.4eV4E)S2t{Jad)~gKO/)ti:^(PH@67_GL.Z.Fwtn3OQi8z}%:%HE,Ot|]c=uNM5vcD0 X-Hue: green X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:23:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wqyvtwcj.fsf@boo.workgroup> (Gregor Zattler's message of "Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:48:44 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12629-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) Version: 24.3 Thanks; applied to emacs-24 branch. From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:28:44 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator