From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 04 13:16:05 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2012 17:16:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJp1o-0004jt-T3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:16:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJp1m-0004jO-Jt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:16:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJp1T-0001Q8-NR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:15:51 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:45283) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJp1T-0001Q4-KM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:15:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJp1N-00011w-TP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:15:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJp1M-0001Ky-JT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:15:37 -0400 Received: from flounder.pepperfish.net ([89.238.129.35]:55997) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJp1M-0001D2-Dd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:15:36 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=octopus.pepperfish.net) by flounder.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.71 #1 (Debian)) id 1TJp0d-0004sz-G2 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:14:51 +0100 From: Vivek Dasmohapatra To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.1; regression in with-timeout in emacs24 Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:14:43 +0100 Message-ID: <82lifmnoqk.fsf@octopus.pepperfish.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) The behaviour of with-timeout appears to have changed radically: (with-timeout (5 "BLERG") (ignore "things") (message "HELLO")) In emacs23: The message form is executed and the return value is that of the=20 message invocation ("HELLO"). In emacs24: All forms after the first form in the BODY are ignored. They=20 are not executed at all (not just a case of prog1 vs progn behaviour). The return value is that of the first form in the body (ie the only one that gets executed). This is at odds with the documentation, which does not indicate that any such change has occurred. In addition, I am told that the interpretation of the=20 (SECONDS TIMEOUT-FORMS)=20 part of the forms arguments has changed:=20 It now appears to be interpreted as: (sec1 time1 ) (sec2 time2) =E2=80=A6=20 Instead. I have confirmed the first difference in behaviour with several people in #emacs on freenode, so it does not appear to be specific to my=20 site. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- In GNU Emacs 24.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.10) of 2012-08-23 on noise, modified by Debian Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11203000 Configured using: `configure '--build' 'x86_64-linux-gnu' '--build' 'x86_64-linux-gnu' '--prefix=3D/usr' '--sharedstatedir=3D/var/lib' '--libexecdir=3D/usr/lib' '--localstatedir=3D/var/lib' '--infodir=3D/usr/share/info' '--mandir=3D/usr/share/man' '--with-pop=3Dyes' '--enable-locallisppath=3D/etc/emacs24:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/2= 4.1/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/24.1/site-l= isp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp' '--with-crt-dir=3D/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' '--with-x=3Dyes' '--with-x-toolkit=3Dgtk' '--with-toolkit-scroll-bars' 'build_alias=3Dx86_64-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=3D-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=3Dssp-buffer-size=3D4 -Wformat -Werror=3Dformat-security -Wall' 'CPPFLAGS=3D-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3D2'' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 04 14:29:29 2012 Received: (at 12577) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2012 18:29:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJqAr-0007Gp-5g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:29:29 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:49791 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJqAo-0007Gh-8f for 12577@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:29:27 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJqAg-0003rM-42; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:29:18 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Vivek Dasmohapatra Subject: Re: bug#12577: 24.1; regression in with-timeout in emacs24 References: <82lifmnoqk.fsf@octopus.pepperfish.net> X-Spook: Albanian Bellcore BCCI e-cash ammunition eavesdropping X-Ran: 2b[x[poy{{r}UJU6braBpbawhBR]3f{Ou~1tTa6sO[U)APl}D;?Ui*q~4CsR (Vivek Dasmohapatra's message of "Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:14:43 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12577 Cc: 12577@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) Vivek Dasmohapatra wrote: > All forms after the first form in the BODY are ignored. Thanks, fixed in emacs-24 branch. > In addition, I am told that the interpretation of the=20 > > (SECONDS TIMEOUT-FORMS)=20 > > part of the forms arguments has changed:=20 > It now appears to be interpreted as: > > (sec1 time1 ) (sec2 time2) =E2=80=A6=20 I don't see it. Can you give an example? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 10 02:35:46 2012 Received: (at 12577-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Oct 2012 06:35:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36726 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TLptR-0000MG-Vu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:35:46 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:57218 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TLptO-0000M7-8s for 12577-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:35:45 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TLpsm-0000Lm-8j; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:35:04 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 12577-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#12577: 24.1; regression in with-timeout in emacs24 References: <82lifmnoqk.fsf@octopus.pepperfish.net> X-Spook: doctrine Echelon HAMASMOIS UFO AMEMB Israel president X-Ran: .7Kx&P[\zc#@4w`=;G9WtOWb|ug');xW,y?cZdAem>rQDeEQ;v}nnk{N.A2|_r~Wos*H8) X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:35:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:29:17 -0400") Message-ID: <4csj9mu960.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12577-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) Version: 24.3 >> (SECONDS TIMEOUT-FORMS)=20 >> >> part of the forms arguments has changed:=20 >> It now appears to be interpreted as: >> >> (sec1 time1 ) (sec2 time2) =E2=80=A6=20 > > I don't see it. Can you give an example? Closing because I fixed the main issue and there has been no further explanation of what this other issue might be. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 10 07:26:09 2012 Received: (at 12577) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Oct 2012 11:26:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36971 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TLuQS-0007SR-TT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:26:09 -0400 Received: from flounder.pepperfish.net ([89.238.129.35]:37499) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TLuQR-0007SJ-4M for 12577@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:26:07 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by flounder.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.71 #1 (Debian)) id 1TLuPD-0000Pz-QU for <12577@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:24:51 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:24:48 +0100 (BST) From: Vivek Dasmohapatra X-X-Sender: vivek@octopus.pepperfish.net To: 12577@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#12577: closed (Re: bug#12577: 24.1; regression in with-timeout in emacs24) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4csj9mu960.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <82lifmnoqk.fsf@octopus.pepperfish.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12577 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) I didn't spot the second behaviour - I did ask the person who spotted it to elaborate: I'll ask them to report a separate bug if they can still reproduce it. From unknown Sun Sep 14 03:43:09 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator