GNU bug report logs - #12577
24.1; regression in with-timeout in emacs24

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 12577 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 12577 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vivek Dasmohapatra <vivek <at> etla.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.1; regression in with-timeout in emacs24
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:14:43 +0100

The behaviour of with-timeout appears to have changed radically:

(with-timeout (5 "BLERG") (ignore "things") (message "HELLO"))

In emacs23:

The message form is executed and the return value is that of the 
message invocation ("HELLO").

In emacs24:

All forms after the first form in the BODY are ignored. They 
are not executed at all (not just a case of prog1 vs progn behaviour).
The return value is that of the first form in the body (ie the only
one that gets executed).

This is at odds with the documentation, which does not indicate
that any such change has occurred.

In addition, I am told that the interpretation of the 

   (SECONDS TIMEOUT-FORMS) 

part of the forms arguments has changed: 
It now appears to be interpreted as:

  (sec1 time1 ) (sec2 time2) … 

Instead.

I have confirmed the first difference in behaviour with several people
in #emacs on freenode, so it does not appear to be specific to my 
site.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

In GNU Emacs 24.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.10)
 of 2012-08-23 on noise, modified by Debian
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version
 11.0.11203000
Configured using:
 `configure '--build' 'x86_64-linux-gnu' '--build' 'x86_64-linux-gnu'
 '--prefix=/usr' '--sharedstatedir=/var/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/lib'
 '--localstatedir=/var/lib' '--infodir=/usr/share/info'
 '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-pop=yes'
 '--enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs24:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/24.1/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/24.1/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp'
 '--with-crt-dir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' '--with-x=yes'
 '--with-x-toolkit=gtk' '--with-toolkit-scroll-bars'
 'build_alias=x86_64-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector
 --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall'
 'CPPFLAGS=-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2''

Message #8 received at 12577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: Vivek Dasmohapatra <vivek <at> etla.org>
Cc: 12577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#12577: 24.1; regression in with-timeout in emacs24
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:29:17 -0400

Vivek Dasmohapatra wrote:

> All forms after the first form in the BODY are ignored.

Thanks, fixed in emacs-24 branch.

> In addition, I am told that the interpretation of the 
>
>    (SECONDS TIMEOUT-FORMS) 
>
> part of the forms arguments has changed: 
> It now appears to be interpreted as:
>
>   (sec1 time1 ) (sec2 time2) … 

I don't see it. Can you give an example?

Message #13 received at 12577-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 12577-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#12577: 24.1; regression in with-timeout in emacs24
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:35:03 -0400

Version: 24.3

>>    (SECONDS TIMEOUT-FORMS) 
>>
>> part of the forms arguments has changed: 
>> It now appears to be interpreted as:
>>
>>   (sec1 time1 ) (sec2 time2) … 
>
> I don't see it. Can you give an example?

Closing because I fixed the main issue and there has been no further
explanation of what this other issue might be.

Message #16 received at 12577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vivek Dasmohapatra <vivek <at> etla.org>
To: 12577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#12577: closed (Re: bug#12577: 24.1; regression in with-timeout
	in emacs24)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:24:48 +0100 (BST)

I didn't spot the second behaviour - I did ask the person who spotted it to
elaborate: I'll ask them to report a separate bug if they can still 
reproduce it.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.