From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:11:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#12515: 24.2.50; Error during redisplay: (eval (mode-line-eol-desc)) signaled (quit) Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 12515 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 12515@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.134859815020135 (code B ref -1); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:36:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2012 18:35:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGZz3-0005Eh-Py for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:35:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34700) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGZz1-0005EZ-7T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:35:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGZx3-0004iM-D5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:33:46 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:36963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGZx3-0004iH-9x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:33:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGZx2-0003Hc-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:33:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGZx0-0004gw-R0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:33:44 -0400 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]:31505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGZx0-0004gO-JT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:33:42 -0400 Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q8PIXecN014574 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:33:41 GMT Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8PIXe4H023593 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:33:40 GMT Received: from abhmt107.oracle.com (abhmt107.oracle.com [141.146.116.59]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q8PIXeDA027133 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:33:40 -0500 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.183.137) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:33:40 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:33:22 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac2bTD4qG3pTlrJTR4KCRTVGXbRzeA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) Sorry, no recipe from emacs -Q, and I have nothing else to offer besides the error message in the subject line. If that does not help, feel free to close the bug. In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2012-09-17 on MARVIN Bzr revision: 110062 cyd@gnu.org-20120917054104-r93rtwkrtva73ewe Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/src -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libiconv-1.13.1-1-dev/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libxml2-2.7.8/include/libxml2' From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:11:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#12515: 24.2.50; Error during redisplay: (eval (mode-line-eol-desc)) signaled (quit) Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12515 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: 12515@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 12515-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12515.134860443129804 (code B ref 12515); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:21:01 +0000 Received: (at 12515) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2012 20:20:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55815 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbcN-0007kf-LU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:20:31 -0400 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:51857) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbcL-0007kX-RU for 12515@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:20:30 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MAX00I009ET2L00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 12515@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:18:27 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MAX00HB19QQU3D0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:18:26 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:18:23 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83sja5hn5c.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:33:22 -0700 > > Sorry, no recipe from emacs -Q, and I have nothing else to offer besides > the error message in the subject line. If that does not help, feel free > to close the bug. Do you remember what were you doing when this happened? Is it possible you typed "C-g"? From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:11:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#12515: 24.2.50; Error during redisplay: (eval (mode-line-eol-desc)) signaled (quit) Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12515 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" Cc: 12515@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 12515-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12515.134860470630206 (code B ref 12515); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:26:02 +0000 Received: (at 12515) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2012 20:25:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55821 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbgo-0007r9-6S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:25:06 -0400 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:39113) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbgm-0007r2-0b for 12515@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:25:04 -0400 Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q8PKMxHi027378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:23:00 GMT Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8PKMxS9024226 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:22:59 GMT Received: from abhmt113.oracle.com (abhmt113.oracle.com [141.146.116.65]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q8PKMwhK007359; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:22:58 -0500 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.183.137) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:22:58 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" References: <83sja5hn5c.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:22:40 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <83sja5hn5c.fsf@gnu.org> Thread-Index: Ac2bWu49GUtqUwJwTb22Y5jHhnXimgAAHb2A X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-Spam-Score: -7.7 (-------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -7.7 (-------) > Do you remember what were you doing when this happened? Is it > possible you typed "C-g"? No. But yes, it is possible that I hit `C-g'. From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:11:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#12515: 24.2.50; Error during redisplay: (eval (mode-line-eol-desc)) signaled (quit) Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12515 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: 12515@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 12515-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12515.134860559731578 (code B ref 12515); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 12515) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2012 20:39:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55827 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbvA-0008DG-FE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:39:57 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:40215) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbv1-0008Cz-TB for 12515@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:39:52 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MAX00900ACY4N00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 12515@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:37:45 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MAX0087FAMWZQ80@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:37:45 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:37:41 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83r4pphm96.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sja5hn5c.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <12515@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:22:40 -0700 > > > Do you remember what were you doing when this happened? Is it > > possible you typed "C-g"? > > No. But yes, it is possible that I hit `C-g'. Unless you see a lot of these messages in *Messages*, I wouldn't worry about this. What happens is that as part of redisplay of the mode line, the display engine calls the function mode-line-eol-desc (defined on bindings.el), which produces the end-of-line (EOL) indicator near the left edge of the mode line. Because signaling an error normally re-enters redisplay (to display the error message), the display code suppresses the normal way of processing signals from Lisp it calls, and instead intercepts all signals and adds this kind of message to *Messages*. Since mode-line-eol-desc does not disable quitting (maybe it should), hitting C-g when it runs could cause this signal, I think. From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:11:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#12515: 24.2.50; Error during redisplay: (eval (mode-line-eol-desc)) signaled (quit) Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12515 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" Cc: 12515@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 12515-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12515.1348606443317 (code B ref 12515); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:55:02 +0000 Received: (at 12515) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2012 20:54:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGc8o-000054-Qe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:54:03 -0400 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:34041) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGc8m-0008WM-CD for 12515@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:54:01 -0400 Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q8PKpu0P025545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:51:57 GMT Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8PKpup6000936 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:51:56 GMT Received: from abhmt110.oracle.com (abhmt110.oracle.com [141.146.116.62]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q8PKpu7J028655; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:51:56 -0500 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.183.137) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:51:56 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" References: <83sja5hn5c.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4pphm96.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:51:38 -0700 Message-ID: <92DF3648D1164884A80C7CA71D1DBF1A@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <83r4pphm96.fsf@gnu.org> Thread-Index: Ac2bXZ/dIU/r848XTTe/cqKut/MwuwAAH3TA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Spam-Score: -7.7 (-------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -7.7 (-------) > Unless you see a lot of these messages in *Messages*, I wouldn't worry > about this. OK, good. I noticed it only once. > What happens is that as part of redisplay of the mode line, the > display engine calls the function mode-line-eol-desc (defined on > bindings.el), which produces the end-of-line (EOL) indicator near the > left edge of the mode line. Because signaling an error normally > re-enters redisplay (to display the error message), the display code > suppresses the normal way of processing signals from Lisp it calls, > and instead intercepts all signals and adds this kind of message to > *Messages*. Since mode-line-eol-desc does not disable quitting (maybe > it should), hitting C-g when it runs could cause this signal, I think. Thanks for taking the time to explain this. I guess part of what you are saying (implying) is that _quitting_ (C-g), because it involves signalling, also "normally re-enters redisplay (to display the" quit message). Sounds like `mode-line-eol-desc' should disable quitting only if it is guaranteed to end quickly. IOW, code that disables quitting should not prevent a user from actually quitting in a timely manner. When you say "disable quitting", do you mean that the user would need to hit `C-g' again, or only that the `C-g' would not be processed until after redisplay finishes (i.e., respects a previously set `quit-flag')? BTW, I looked in `(elisp) Quitting' for some explanation of this, but it does not seem to mention "display" or "redisplay" at all. (It does mention C code, however.) From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:11:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#12515: 24.2.50; Error during redisplay: (eval (mode-line-eol-desc)) signaled (quit) Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12515 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: 12515@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 12515-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12515.13486075921997 (code B ref 12515); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:14:02 +0000 Received: (at 12515) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2012 21:13:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGcRM-0000W9-Ed for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:13:12 -0400 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:59577) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGcRK-0000W2-4W for 12515@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:13:11 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MAX00E00C3XYG00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 12515@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:11:07 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MAX00EQYC6JTQ90@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:11:07 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:11:04 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <92DF3648D1164884A80C7CA71D1DBF1A@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83obkthkpj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sja5hn5c.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4pphm96.fsf@gnu.org> <92DF3648D1164884A80C7CA71D1DBF1A@us.oracle.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <12515@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:51:38 -0700 > > I guess part of what you are saying (implying) is that _quitting_ (C-g), because > it involves signalling, also "normally re-enters redisplay (to display the" quit > message). Yes. But there are places in Emacs that signal 'quit' for other reasons, AFAICS. > Sounds like `mode-line-eol-desc' should disable quitting only if it is > guaranteed to end quickly. If it doesn't end quickly, redisplay will become sluggish, and people will promptly complain that, say, C-f takes too long. In general, anything that is called as part of redisplay must be quick, for that very reason. > When you say "disable quitting", do you mean that the user would need to hit > `C-g' again, or only that the `C-g' would not be processed until after redisplay > finishes (i.e., respects a previously set `quit-flag')? The latter. > BTW, I looked in `(elisp) Quitting' for some explanation of this, but it does > not seem to mention "display" or "redisplay" at all. (It does mention C code, > however.) It's not quitting that re-enters redisplay, it's the 'quit' signal that is caused by it, when it is caused by it. But yes, documentation of the Emacs display engine leaves a lot to be desired. Luckily, Lisp programmers don't normally need to know too much about that, and the simple "natural" mental model will usually do. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 11 16:12:51 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2012 21:12:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37641 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiX8F-0004ar-05 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:12:51 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:41554) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiX8C-0004ak-Fy for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:12:48 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiX7V-0001fe-H8 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:12:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:12:05 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 12515 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) forcemerge 12704 12515 From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:11:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#12515: bug#12704: 24.2.50; QuitError during redisplay: (eval (\` ((-3 (\, (propertize "%p" ... Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 03:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12515 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Drew Adams" Cc: 12515@debbugs.gnu.org, 'Stefan Monnier' , 12704@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 12515-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12515.13919152646847 (code B ref 12515); Sun, 09 Feb 2014 03:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 12515) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2014 03:07:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58628 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCKkC-0001mH-6l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:07:44 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:46693) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCKk8-0001m2-9X; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:07:40 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCKjq-0004Hd-Mn; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 04:07:23 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <29E638EE06A84E7DBF83D734916FF47F@us.oracle.com> <83mwzecu19.fsf@gnu.org> <3407457CC337495DB10DBBB006A6CDDF@us.oracle.com> <2B2AB6A97B554C8EAA17A1A14422F191@us.oracle.com> <9E8791A163EB4DF9BF9E67BD23FBF3F3@us.oracle.com> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:06:09 -0800 In-Reply-To: <9E8791A163EB4DF9BF9E67BD23FBF3F3@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:03:17 -0700") Message-ID: <87sirthtni.fsf@building.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCKjq-0004Hd-Mn X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392520044.62529@epiZuOubpAlnvuBNbboeBg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) "Drew Adams" writes: > It happened again today, when I was trying to use the debugger with icomplete > code. > > Error during redisplay: (eval (mode-line-eol-desc)) signaled (quit) Ok, then this doesn't seem to be a bug. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 08 22:08:00 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2014 03:08:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58631 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCKkR-0001ms-LU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:07:59 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:32824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCKkP-0001mk-Bk for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:07:57 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCKkB-0004Hn-NK for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 04:07:44 +0100 Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:06:19 -0800 Message-Id: <87r47dhtn8.fsf@building.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #12515 X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCKkB-0004Hn-NK X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392520064.41604@2etGhAfYl9aVpPMvH0OOPg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) close 12515