From unknown Wed Jun 18 00:25:57 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#12500 <12500@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#12500 <12500@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.2.50; (search-failed "\n debug(") in debugger Reply-To: bug#12500 <12500@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 07:25:57 +0000 retitle 12500 24.2.50; (search-failed "\n debug(") in debugger reassign 12500 emacs submitter 12500 Helmut Eller severity 12500 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 24 02:36:34 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2012 06:36:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51988 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TG2HS-0006U0-8t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 02:36:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42375) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TG2HN-0006Tm-FI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 02:36:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TG2FY-0006nm-5v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 02:34:37 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:52831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TG2FY-0006ni-2P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 02:34:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TG2FX-0002aB-6L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 02:34:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TG2FV-0006nJ-I1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 02:34:35 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:62318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TG2FV-0006m7-CC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 02:34:33 -0400 Received: by weyu3 with SMTP id u3so1714350wey.0 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:34:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=8t5P+7ZbQKUHHUX5jdouFnHy6+i9K+YxvOJt+ChkTqU=; b=M0gnju4ttVKVXJ8kaozvU0LG0/QXrN4dVi/dIBnvAxko/chmJfgd3XTQf72w1h/K53 n8HYJUfsC8EnoE+X4tt1fiTi22SbCLV91quTvlx47Q2YdJmdE1A0mGG6LiKX/hDGkZZv Bj2Div3M0z55M7aEhejjl/Q0KKccEzDVIyJJeZSLfJM9K/MN1t6VwD4a4mJzYyoquivi Rz7sU83QVU5hkvwHwr7qKp42MLUdQY5E+C5ouqmOVRC1haAmWZTMkxJh39XKaPrY8YWP yJ8FQydUcanUFJEB5gdPhRAWK9be3KLmWtxzxfkJArXLU90Z/3G0K07zr2sVuFgC0iXi GM6w== Received: by 10.216.202.8 with SMTP id c8mr5984922weo.82.1348468471838; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:34:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ix (dial-181022.pool.broadband44.net. [212.46.181.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ct3sm13232865wib.5.2012.09.23.23.34.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:34:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from helmut by ix with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TG2FS-0000Xh-07 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:34:30 +0200 From: Helmut Eller To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.2.50; (search-failed "\n debug(") in debugger Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:34:29 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) When stepping, the (search-forward "\n debug(") in debugger-setup-buffer sometimes fails. To reproduce this 1. eval this (progn (defun foo () (debug nil 1) (debug nil 2)) (setq toggle-debug-on-error t) (foo)) 2. The debugger pops up with the message: Debugger entered: (1) foo() 3. At the line with foo(), press d (i.e. debugger-step-through). 4. Now the buffer starts with: Debugger entered--beginning evaluation of function call form: * (debug nil 2) 5. Now press c (i.e. debugger-continue) on the line with the *. 6. The debugger enters recursively with the error: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (search-failed "\n debug(") In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.1) of 2012-09-22 on ix Bzr revision: 110128 cyd@gnu.org-20120922032937-yf6yua64ed45tzap Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10707000 Configured using: `configure '--with-jpeg=no' '--with-gif=no' '--with-tiff=no'' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 06 23:21:55 2012 Received: (at 12500) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2012 04:21:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57596 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgpRj-0003dS-6X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:21:55 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:20751) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgpRh-0003dK-6O for 12500@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:21:53 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0FAG6Zu09soXOY/2dsb2JhbABEsEiDSYEIghUBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHAW6CZBEA4hCmnGBWIMH X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="209264817" Received: from 108-161-115-152.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.161.115.152]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 06 Dec 2012 23:21:36 -0500 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B83FF58F5C; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 23:21:34 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Helmut Eller Subject: Re: bug#12500: 24.2.50; (search-failed "\n debug(") in debugger Message-ID: References: Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:21:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Helmut Eller's message of "Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:34:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12500 Cc: 12500@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > When stepping, the (search-forward "\n debug(") in > debugger-setup-buffer sometimes fails. To reproduce this The patch below seems to fix the problem in your test case; can you confirm that it fixes your problem? Stefan === modified file 'lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el' --- lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el 2012-11-13 03:06:56 +0000 +++ lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el 2012-12-07 04:19:04 +0000 @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ (goto-char (point-min)) (delete-region (point) (progn - (search-forward "\n debug(") + (re-search-forward "\n. debug(") (forward-line (if (eq (car args) 'debug) ;; Remove debug--implement-debug-on-entry ;; and the advice's `apply' frame. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 29 13:20:36 2016 Received: (at 12500) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2016 18:20:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40783 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aPDeu-0006sQ-D0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:20:36 -0500 Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:45153) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aPDes-0006sI-IM for 12500@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:20:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168589D2002; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:20:33 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jj9HcvypvboE; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:20:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (unknown [109.232.24.28]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 858B19D2001; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:20:30 +0100 (CET) From: Marcin Borkowski To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#12500: 24.2.50; (search-failed "\n debug(") in debugger Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:20:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:21:34 -0500") Message-ID: <87k2msi6xe.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12500 Cc: 12500@debbugs.gnu.org, Helmut Eller X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) On 2012-12-06, at 23:21, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> When stepping, the (search-forward "\n debug(") in >> debugger-setup-buffer sometimes fails. To reproduce this > > The patch below seems to fix the problem in your test case; can you > confirm that it fixes your problem? Just wondering: should this bug be closed? It's apparently been fixed more than 3 years ago, and there are no further reports. What is the right course of action? Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://mbork.pl/en From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 29 13:37:40 2016 Received: (at 12500) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2016 18:37:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40795 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aPDvQ-0007Ii-2s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:37:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:35659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aPDvO-0007IT-Jf for 12500@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:37:38 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id l66so11407245wml.2 for <12500@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:37:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=RpCbE5aAWFS+9Vc+PqRYIZOBXsr9o16SRryDvGOOpTw=; b=iDJCSw7XE0Kn/TL3PV2hmafsU/ZStBQEBv5meeqSiSjXqvp7jrMzSFE8ciOb4N+Ep8 /Tbr1foxWVn3isPJU0TeO3VY/2O+J76MwJMSOU5GYnYxSMEnX508zzGguVDCGDoimCRA u/+4yxiSBmMIv/hvNya0F2o026WbtT6SxW4sdhekLTWE7XevIfw0tLU9D5zROm2gIzCy gCFD5VFHaZEfy5BtP4s3IMD2McwCoAFD7XpeIX1X6diDrTa+yGmnkI2g2ifJ4xoTNN/V PVSJ6/552lFoW1ZXqmlkE23d361o2dBf0B3FlgwvaphgW50LOR5m23JGDs5cR9l2cHCn VLeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=RpCbE5aAWFS+9Vc+PqRYIZOBXsr9o16SRryDvGOOpTw=; b=HfsAA7CxhFLYe42vUnp8B00CB29A9OCURHD2cUTH1idYM35R2OUI56SER52e3D6Lck L2nR9JhMFrpK4wxLnECjJ1fA9IgtXxrd9HvSD+nEDLpk3bHqP3Nk+JRWxL1Ke+/aeizt j2LHBVIOOzgDDsnG9yatQpj422FPhOsG4wOyM5FD4JLp/20fxI+XsgBX1idgxIRjFyTw MKa/WXEaIuDRJMn0DOgj7e6o2GdqiXMdyuohPuuigZZV432rKqlZtP6sLvX52HaS011E ggpbUcgcOhUX1wT19kwyc7nL54VwBWXSnYs4ASeTIJaklPB/syK3phM8XV+GKj2MdQx5 N/ew== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSIKkmDUw3j9zvglBduer9+jtz/BAMDSly6DiE3wq10T3/NaNT0PkuS0//6jZf36A== X-Received: by 10.28.52.134 with SMTP id b128mr9909050wma.99.1454092652986; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:37:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from ix (reserved-175113.pool.broadband44.net. [212.46.175.113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hq9sm2406391wjb.34.2016.01.29.10.37.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:37:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from helmut by ix with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aPDvI-00043D-5R; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:37:32 +0100 From: Helmut Eller To: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: bug#12500: 24.2.50; (search-failed "\n debug(") in debugger References: <87k2msi6xe.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:37:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k2msi6xe.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:20:29 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12500 Cc: 12500@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Fri, Jan 29 2016, Marcin Borkowski wrote: >> The patch below seems to fix the problem in your test case; can you >> confirm that it fixes your problem? > > Just wondering: should this bug be closed? Closing it is ok with me. Helmut From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 29 14:11:30 2016 Received: (at 12500) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2016 19:11:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40811 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aPESA-00086L-1X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:11:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54537) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aPES8-000868-4x for 12500@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:11:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aPES2-0001BX-91 for 12500@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:11:23 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aPERx-0001BI-Pj; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:11:17 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4586 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aPERx-0007F1-14; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:11:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 21:10:49 +0200 Message-Id: <83a8noxkue.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Marcin Borkowski In-reply-to: <87k2msi6xe.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> (message from Marcin Borkowski on Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:20:29 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#12500: 24.2.50; (search-failed "\n debug(") in debugger References: <87k2msi6xe.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12500 Cc: 12500@debbugs.gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: Marcin Borkowski > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:20:29 +0100 > Cc: 12500@debbugs.gnu.org, Helmut Eller > > On 2012-12-06, at 23:21, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > >> When stepping, the (search-forward "\n debug(") in > >> debugger-setup-buffer sometimes fails. To reproduce this > > > > The patch below seems to fix the problem in your test case; can you > > confirm that it fixes your problem? > > Just wondering: should this bug be closed? Yes, please. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 29 14:12:49 2016 Received: (at 12500-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2016 19:12:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40818 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aPETR-00088a-Jz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:12:49 -0500 Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:46600) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aPETP-00088R-QY for 12500-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:12:48 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904049D2002; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 20:12:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NVLlaYxctVEm; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 20:12:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (unknown [109.232.24.28]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2A0A9D2001; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 20:12:42 +0100 (CET) References: <87k2msi6xe.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 25.1.50.1 From: Marcin Borkowski To: Helmut Eller Subject: Re: bug#12500: 24.2.50; (search-failed "\n debug(") in debugger In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 20:12:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87io2ci4if.fsf@mbork.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12500-done Cc: 12500-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On 2016-01-29, at 19:37, Helmut Eller wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29 2016, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > >>> The patch below seems to fix the problem in your test case; can you >>> confirm that it fixes your problem? >> >> Just wondering: should this bug be closed? > > Closing it is ok with me. As you wish. ;-) > Helmut Thanks, and best regards, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University From unknown Wed Jun 18 00:25:57 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator