Subject: bug#12492: vc-dir vs. vc-root-dir

From: Ivan Shmakov <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:40:50 +0000

>>>>> Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]> writes:

 >> Is there any good reason we can’t have a similar arrangement for
 >> vc-dir (C-x v d) and the proposed vc-root-dir command (say, C-x v /,
 >> – where ‘/’ is a kind of obvious mnemonic for “root”)?

 > If `C-x v D' were available, I guess that would be OK, but given
 > that's not the case, I don't think it's worth the trouble.

	Why is that a problem?  Especially given that the recent
	discussion seems to suggest that there’re going to be VC users
	who’d stick to vc-root-dir exclusively.

-- 
FSF associate member #7257  http://boycottsystemd.org/  … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A