Subject: bug#12492: vc-dir vs. vc-root-dir

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:55:24 -0500

> 	Is there any good reason we can’t have a similar arrangement for
> 	vc-dir (C-x v d) and the proposed vc-root-dir command (say,
> 	C-x v /, – where ‘/’ is a kind of obvious mnemonic for “root”)?

If `C-x v D' were available, I guess that would be OK, but given that's
not the case, I don't think it's worth the trouble.

        Stefan