From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 11 05:04:41 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2012 09:04:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53610 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBMOa-0006ga-U5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:04:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51316) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBMOX-0006gR-7B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:04:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBMNo-0004Hm-An for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:03:53 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:56420) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBMNo-0004Hh-7O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:03:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41696) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBMNn-00040v-DZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:03:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBMNm-0004HL-Bs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:03:47 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:57910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBMNm-0004HA-5p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:03:46 -0400 Received: by wibhq4 with SMTP id hq4so2815819wib.12 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:03:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=wx4Uhm8cyVIGhHaJNG/8Ll1Bvd82E51Q0WHtsOQFmVM=; b=wPW1EggEwND2NozXY9XsUwIu0T2TrYNLEwB3EXzCvEZfQJDlsIryDaD46Q2Dt6hKFL RAia2y0D2gpdZHTmo3aVm0+Qn/viT0Nsjbi/gRKyRVOsLruN02xZtYHA0hEadeXd0T6y JjmAK61py4aRSq7gQCvA02Z9qy/vN+r+Ri62KLvHClom31W5oMnIPbvQDpuPRwQbORJ7 x4yfsq2denI22ZxCIjSn6lwP8M6c87UN8lyJjVKoV3MDGU+6Z0iONR/QXabfWSAYXLnG peW5Mpvv6/h2IRsi4iTJ/zpKjA1gPBkJInAx1SYkY2HJ/wXjMWCULUmDRvEDMSEja0Qp LIaw== Received: by 10.216.116.73 with SMTP id f51mr9862069weh.50.1347354225450; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:03:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from myhost.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b7sm2488925wiz.9.2012.09.11.02.03.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4D75989A2; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:03:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.2.50; `make distclean' runs ./configure before cleaning User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:03:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87lighlymk.fsf@altern.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) I just ran `make distclean' with latest bzr revision and noticed it runs ./configure before cleaning up the dist files. Is it necessary? In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.10) of 2012-09-10 on myhost Bzr revision: 109965 cyd@gnu.org-20120910032510-vrblnwlfnsb0cx3s Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11201000 Important settings: value of $LANG: fr_FR.UTF-8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default enable-multibyte-characters: t -- Bastien From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 11 13:25:23 2012 Received: (at 12410) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2012 17:25:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54997 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBUDD-0002T3-Dn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:25:23 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:55038) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBUDB-0002Sr-01 for 12410@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:25:21 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBUCT-0006Fh-0g; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:24:37 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Bastien Subject: Re: bug#12410: 24.2.50; `make distclean' runs ./configure before cleaning References: <87lighlymk.fsf@altern.org> X-Spook: Ron Brown Defcon David John Oates Vince Foster Ft. Bragg X-Ran: wy,+6<#b]io@QF)@-B$xOHQbo|jT5oB>Kg,fv/V,6u,\%Qf",^,A^!dbGL X-Hue: black X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:24:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lighlymk.fsf@altern.org> (Bastien's message of "Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:03:47 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -7.3 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12410 Cc: 12410@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -7.3 (-------) Bastien wrote: > I just ran `make distclean' with latest bzr revision and noticed > it runs ./configure before cleaning up the dist files. > > Is it necessary? It can be, yes. IIUC: Makefile itself has dependencies on eg the various Makefile.in's. If these get updated in the repository, configure has to be run to regenerate the Makefiles before doing anything else. For example, suppose there was a bug in Makefile.in whereby distclean did `rm -rf /'. If a fix was checked in, you'd want Makefile to be regenerated before doing anything else... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 11 13:45:21 2012 Received: (at 12410) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2012 17:45:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55048 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBUWW-0004Nr-Nd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:45:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:39155) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBUWU-0004Ka-TH for 12410@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:45:19 -0400 Received: by wibhm6 with SMTP id hm6so761272wib.15 for <12410@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:44:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=9DzS2fzsc9rqwJQVCMIoyJoyn7V6hmyYkVsoVUWmnNo=; b=GmnxWiHDfRpPRVoNqqCs4fyDCc30vpfD9fGj9fRhV/y2NvfchfPLEtpNID7ZGJOh8v Kp1jTeNLDa5ibXF4BsdR/yhdmhrOlho0FT3WruVToldsCBHhefn5mJGG7A9ml+1leM1q AXqv/o/Zt8C23UZK+se6Pp3nzBUOCRZGpv5CAqHhEv2CZps+fflK3plhyieXXGpS7QF9 VYUg4+FLTl0yPe2GCUBLmulAUAhjORKiSWdk7DK2c2uBq0+P9FPfmSrN2NFFU/cZnGwW vVdemMYpGg1p0kBRC6IN35yH6GhbZw6Y8Uw2YCYQFAwyjMfbs4CxdDa7EhnebRhVhiHj DO5A== Received: by 10.216.135.217 with SMTP id u67mr11139522wei.115.1347385476962; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from myhost.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h9sm3563737wiz.1.2012.09.11.10.44.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 874AB89A2; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:44:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#12410: 24.2.50; `make distclean' runs ./configure before cleaning In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:24:36 -0400") References: <87lighlymk.fsf@altern.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:44:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87627kihdl.fsf@altern.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12410 Cc: 12410@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Glenn Morris writes: > It can be, yes. IIUC: > > Makefile itself has dependencies on eg the various Makefile.in's. > If these get updated in the repository, configure has to be run to > regenerate the Makefiles before doing anything else. For example, > suppose there was a bug in Makefile.in whereby distclean did `rm -rf /'. > If a fix was checked in, you'd want Makefile to be regenerated before > doing anything else... Got it -- thanks, -- Bastien From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 11 13:55:28 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2012 17:55:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55068 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBUgK-0004wr-4s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:55:28 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:55790) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBUgH-0004wj-G8 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:55:26 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBUfb-0002us-Nz for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:54:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:54:43 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 12410 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -7.3 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -7.3 (-------) close 12410 From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:42:36 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:24:02 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator