From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 09 10:49:51 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2012 14:49:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50394 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TAipa-0006xZ-Or for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 10:49:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58853) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TAipZ-0006xT-1u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 10:49:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TAip5-0004Y3-1J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 10:49:19 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:43067) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TAip4-0004Xy-Uf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 10:49:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TAip4-0005W6-58 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 10:49:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TAip3-0004Xl-3o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 10:49:18 -0400 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]:33043) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TAip2-0004Xh-TF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 10:49:17 -0400 Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q89EnEvZ005790 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 14:49:15 GMT Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q89EnE3D021012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 14:49:14 GMT Received: from abhmt120.oracle.com (abhmt120.oracle.com [141.146.116.72]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q89EnDCi009389 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 09:49:14 -0500 Received: from dradamslap1 (/71.202.147.44) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 07:49:13 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: Subject: 24.2.50; `C-h f emacs-version' ignores doc string; gives no information Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 07:49:02 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac2OmkCkWbfPK6yRT8Kaiby5FtS0Qg== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) emacs -Q C-h f emacs-version Missing all information. The doc string is ignored. In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2012-09-02 on MARVIN Bzr revision: 109861 eggert@cs.ucla.edu-20120902171035-7mzihil3xd6bjfiy Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.6) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/src -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libiconv-1.13.1-1-dev/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libxml2-2.7.8/include/libxml2' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 11 10:45:18 2012 Received: (at 12395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2012 14:45:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54814 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBRiH-00075G-Ax for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:45:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:38166) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBRiE-000757-BY for 12395@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:45:16 -0400 Received: by wibhm6 with SMTP id hm6so552890wib.15 for <12395@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:44:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=8GOxsDV9/lQWZiRk8iXFE2qqTACiFtfpGAOxAjuBDvM=; b=zLCnA+Bq1bJ4wb3BemjH/yREJOA0SaSWPfQNdOGq2n8BQE7X3qwmR2ZlUzFQfifoPt i5Nl5FH9/zSFAtCNjKUj8EZddNWtJeHDCj7MoraGRh1z+kAIKPdLmJZ09RWkzNuJGCsJ pJfAkSnqjX2m3a9gD9Q5po92RP3zudJmxFmJ++FYO63mC3XToxJuWttm7K3l3nRvb2cM PIrBnSZbrkUcUPLBOi+AhX+ySjFybjBYeWZUgd6r/D942lIxcN2e3HR89a7w3nwwgoBt Dmm/7Wyvo3fpfTw9Fi6x4foX8z8VAYCKAzzdBtHZhnbSfhvhjcf4dxdIeGDzQLds+HdE gTWA== Received: by 10.180.99.196 with SMTP id es4mr25606044wib.18.1347374673110; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from myhost.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hv8sm3183906wib.0.2012.09.11.07.44.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A736989A2; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:44:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#12395: 24.2.50; `C-h f emacs-version' ignores doc string; gives no information In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 9 Sep 2012 07:49:02 -0700") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:44:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87bohc1uwe.fsf@altern.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12395 Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) "Drew Adams" writes: > emacs -Q > > C-h f emacs-version > > Missing all information. The doc string is ignored. I can't reproduce this, I get the docstring. Any more info so that I can reproduce this or shall I just close this issue? -- Bastien From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 11 10:53:33 2012 Received: (at 12395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2012 14:53:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54823 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBRqH-0007GT-CO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:53:33 -0400 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]:48552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBRqE-0007GL-Oc for 12395@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:53:31 -0400 Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q8BEqiCL001165 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:52:45 GMT Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8BEqhAs019345 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:52:44 GMT Received: from abhmt103.oracle.com (abhmt103.oracle.com [141.146.116.55]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q8BEqhug031344; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:52:43 -0500 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.175.11) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:52:43 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Bastien'" References: <87bohc1uwe.fsf@altern.org> Subject: RE: bug#12395: 24.2.50; `C-h f emacs-version' ignores doc string; gives no information Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:52:35 -0700 Message-ID: <717A900B9B0849AA933E921F5872D027@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <87bohc1uwe.fsf@altern.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Thread-Index: Ac2QK/YS3k+Jzeg8RKufX+M1q9XtswAAKf7Q X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-Spam-Score: -7.2 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12395 Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -7.2 (-------) > > emacs -Q > > > > C-h f emacs-version > > > > Missing all information. The doc string is ignored. > > I can't reproduce this, I get the docstring. > Any more info so that I can reproduce this or shall I > just close this issue? No, please do not close it. Perhaps it is Windows-specific; dunno. I get this systematically. This is the full output from `C-h f emacs-version RET': --- emacs-version is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `version.el'. (emacs-version &optional HERE) Not documented. --- In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2012-08-26 on MARVIN Bzr revision: 109788 dmantipov@yandex.ru-20120827041533-3cy7pdjdqz14o90c Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.6) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/src -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libiconv-1.13.1-1-dev/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libxml2-2.7.8/include/libxml2' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 11 11:32:05 2012 Received: (at 12395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2012 15:32:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54856 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBSRY-00088v-Tf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:32:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:36249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBSRW-00088n-Lp for 12395@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:32:03 -0400 Received: by wgi16 with SMTP id 16so451192wgi.15 for <12395@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:31:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=k8k9mNyD4lAnxZX2u/x+xrTWodONAOwzONusXujEEWI=; b=jiWuy9Y6ZiwTuYUQr3K3SjIJyxh7OzpdgkRosDRlaeVPtvlu1JBGG2bUka050w2RUU v1g0C32jFkpErZ2n/OJ/fCJrgkgbVFl4sOon/Q7/NcIVZ1zPkiIs8PxJq2dtjBPRVAiN RE+Kjsl88kdkia6GWFnm2o3DHFGf6wwr/RWEGAMTLfvY/LK188wPs65O2Wersfn1Dz5k kKuq5wpEnSf/pZQh5iV79fkeafXwlccnRLUYsXePDYzCwdKFwmK5CtzNLWXK0SIx+iez OeK5KwXSw+KWqZluqEGbFPE8zk8KJQWVBzAKm/6U5g3IiExP/Iu/TLTfYugVMuzhoxum AJ6A== Received: by 10.216.198.10 with SMTP id u10mr10145469wen.80.1347377480867; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from myhost.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cl8sm3023305wib.10.2012.09.11.08.31.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 96CE389A2; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:31:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#12395: 24.2.50; `C-h f emacs-version' ignores doc string; gives no information In-Reply-To: <717A900B9B0849AA933E921F5872D027@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:52:35 -0700") References: <87bohc1uwe.fsf@altern.org> <717A900B9B0849AA933E921F5872D027@us.oracle.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:31:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87mx0wzid1.fsf@altern.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12395 Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) "Drew Adams" writes: >> > emacs -Q >> > >> > C-h f emacs-version >> > >> > Missing all information. The doc string is ignored. >> >> I can't reproduce this, I get the docstring. >> Any more info so that I can reproduce this or shall I >> just close this issue? > > No, please do not close it. Okay. -- Bastien From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 19 10:48:15 2012 Received: (at 12395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2012 14:48:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51829 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPDrx-0007uQ-U0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:48:14 -0400 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]:36908) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPDru-0007uD-OF for 12395@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:48:11 -0400 Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q9JEkT8h012906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:46:30 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9JEkR4x016553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:46:27 GMT Received: from abhmt109.oracle.com (abhmt109.oracle.com [141.146.116.61]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q9JEkQxO023719; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:46:26 -0500 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.217.151) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 07:46:26 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Bastien'" References: <87bohc1uwe.fsf@altern.org> <717A900B9B0849AA933E921F5872D027@us.oracle.com> Subject: RE: bug#12395: 24.2.50; `C-h f emacs-version' ignores doc string; gives no information Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 07:45:59 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <717A900B9B0849AA933E921F5872D027@us.oracle.com> Thread-Index: Ac2QK/YS3k+Jzeg8RKufX+M1q9XtswAAKf7QB3bq9SA= X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12395 Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) > > > emacs -Q > > > C-h f emacs-version > > > Missing all information. The doc string is ignored. ping. Still true in the latest build: In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2012-10-15 on DANI-PC Bzr revision: 110553 monnier@iro.umontreal.ca-20121015164957-6zms5w2js1xkldtg Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -I../../libs/libxpm-3.5.8/include -I../../libs/libxpm-3.5.8/src -I../../libs/libpng-1.4.10 -I../../libs/zlib-1.2.6 -I../../libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include -I../../libs/jpeg-6b-4/include -I../../libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include -I../../libs/libxml2-2.7.8-w32-bin/include/libxml2 -I../../libs/gnutls-3.0.16/include -I../../libs/libiconv-1.14-2-mingw32-dev/include' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 20 01:59:58 2012 Received: (at 12395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2012 05:59:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52547 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPS6I-00044e-87 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 01:59:58 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]:51792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPS6G-00044S-6l for 12395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 01:59:57 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u46so584430wey.3 for <12395@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:58:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=J1dUXnJAqtUVs1Vwfb+KyDFNBUgVcmBrnU3gnkJgE1E=; b=iHLg/KAb4Hvzh9sRJT9xbMpWma7T0etHc2ZIUPOvoWdN1BkMx14do1GeeRX7S62yp2 jMvihFHE+lTvRVmmoOxMHdAWOIZEO9gXD58f/twbmAZNH1KC0LmjUH+NqJ3gUJsHF6Dh 8vmqoBh34gC1IaefMh7psRvwYglbVITfoozNYNqVUfaKyTqrRCWdtyFMuDHXKAd/+Llq +NcAQIfu7vQjVPMkiR4LfmsYKF04jhwVN7L1P9ugA3zlV7fInMPDAndm/ttaEPEJrIrb Hs7aGePQKxkV6XBB1beLBFMVcEeCUSJQlenf4FuEK8wiXklh+tcas2dNhxHL+mMMKvqC 2Uyw== Received: by 10.180.99.133 with SMTP id eq5mr23430401wib.21.1350712696946; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gm7sm7506899wib.10.2012.10.19.22.58.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB11E22E85; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 07:58:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#12395: 24.2.50; `C-h f emacs-version' ignores doc string; gives no information In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 19 Oct 2012 07:45:59 -0700") References: <87bohc1uwe.fsf@altern.org> <717A900B9B0849AA933E921F5872D027@us.oracle.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 07:58:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87mwzhznue.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12395 Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) Hi Drew, "Drew Adams" writes: >> > > emacs -Q >> > > C-h f emacs-version >> > > Missing all information. The doc string is ignored. > > ping. Still true in the latest build: I don't use MS Windows so I cannot reproduce this. Hopefully some MS Windows user can help here. Best, -- Bastien From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 20 05:25:46 2012 Received: (at 12395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2012 09:25:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52632 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPVJR-000083-JE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 05:25:46 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:61377) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPVJP-00007o-HJ for 12395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 05:25:44 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MC600300Q26WX00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 12395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:23:35 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MC6003ABQ3BWZ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:23:35 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:23:25 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12395: 24.2.50; `C-h f emacs-version' ignores doc string; gives no information In-reply-to: <87mwzhznue.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Bastien Message-id: <83a9vhzecy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bohc1uwe.fsf@altern.org> <717A900B9B0849AA933E921F5872D027@us.oracle.com> <87mwzhznue.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Bastien > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 07:58:33 +0200 > Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org > > Hi Drew, > > "Drew Adams" writes: > > >> > > emacs -Q > >> > > C-h f emacs-version > >> > > Missing all information. The doc string is ignored. > > > > ping. Still true in the latest build: > > I don't use MS Windows so I cannot reproduce this. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12395 Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Bastien > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 07:58:33 +0200 > Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org > > Hi Drew, > > "Drew Adams" writes: > > >> > > emacs -Q > >> > > C-h f emacs-version > >> > > Missing all information. The doc string is ignored. > > > > ping. Still true in the latest build: > > I don't use MS Windows so I cannot reproduce this. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > From: Bastien > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 07:58:33 +0200 > Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org > > Hi Drew, > > "Drew Adams" writes: > > >> > > emacs -Q > >> > > C-h f emacs-version > >> > > Missing all information. The doc string is ignored. > > > > ping. Still true in the latest build: > > I don't use MS Windows so I cannot reproduce this. You don't need to be on Windows. Just do cd lib-src && ./make-docfile -o DOC-test ../lisp/version.el and you will see the bug. I'm working on fixing it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 20 06:07:52 2012 Received: (at 12395-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2012 10:07:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52658 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPVyC-00014k-HW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 06:07:52 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:37644) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPVyA-00014W-9H for 12395-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 06:07:51 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MC600400RXQA800@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 12395-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:06:09 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MC6004IPS293340@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:06:09 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:05:59 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12395: 24.2.50; `C-h f emacs-version' ignores doc string; gives no information In-reply-to: <83a9vhzecy.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Drew Adams Message-id: <838vb1zce0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bohc1uwe.fsf@altern.org> <717A900B9B0849AA933E921F5872D027@us.oracle.com> <87mwzhznue.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83a9vhzecy.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:23:25 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org > > > From: Bastien > > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 07:58:33 +0200 > > Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Hi Drew, > > > > "Drew Adams" writes: > > > > >> > > emacs -Q > > >> > > C-h f emacs-version > > >> > > Missing all information. The doc string is ignored. > > > > > > ping. Still true in the latest build: > > > > I don't use MS Windows so I cannot reproduce this. > > You don't need to be on Windows. Just do > > cd lib-src && ./make-docfile -o DOC-test ../lisp/version.el > > and you will see the bug. > > I'm working on fixing it. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12395-done Cc: bzg@altern.org, 12395-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:23:25 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org > > > From: Bastien > > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 07:58:33 +0200 > > Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Hi Drew, > > > > "Drew Adams" writes: > > > > >> > > emacs -Q > > >> > > C-h f emacs-version > > >> > > Missing all information. The doc string is ignored. > > > > > > ping. Still true in the latest build: > > > > I don't use MS Windows so I cannot reproduce this. > > You don't need to be on Windows. Just do > > cd lib-src && ./make-docfile -o DOC-test ../lisp/version.el > > and you will see the bug. > > I'm working on fixing it. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:23:25 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org > > > From: Bastien > > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 07:58:33 +0200 > > Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Hi Drew, > > > > "Drew Adams" writes: > > > > >> > > emacs -Q > > >> > > C-h f emacs-version > > >> > > Missing all information. The doc string is ignored. > > > > > > ping. Still true in the latest build: > > > > I don't use MS Windows so I cannot reproduce this. > > You don't need to be on Windows. Just do > > cd lib-src && ./make-docfile -o DOC-test ../lisp/version.el > > and you will see the bug. > > I'm working on fixing it. Fixed in revision 110597 on the trunk. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 20 06:41:15 2012 Received: (at 12395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2012 10:41:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52684 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPWUU-0001sy-U5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 06:41:15 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:52706) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPWUS-0001sk-Ag for 12395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 06:41:13 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MC600400TLHO100@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 12395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:39:22 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MC60033ZTLLZLF0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:39:21 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:39:11 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12395: 24.2.50; `C-h f emacs-version' ignores doc string; gives no information In-reply-to: <838vb1zce0.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Stefan Monnier , Glenn Morris Message-id: <833919zauo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bohc1uwe.fsf@altern.org> <717A900B9B0849AA933E921F5872D027@us.oracle.com> <87mwzhznue.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83a9vhzecy.fsf@gnu.org> <838vb1zce0.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Incidentally, is it OK that cp51932.el and eucjp-ms.el are loaded as uncompiled Lisp files, but are not in src/lisp.mk? That seems to fly in the face of the commentary at the beginning of loadup.el, which says to add them to lisp.mk, and also contradicts the current convention of byte-compiling everything, even if not strictly speaking necessary. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12395 Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org, Kenichi Handa X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Incidentally, is it OK that cp51932.el and eucjp-ms.el are loaded as uncompiled Lisp files, but are not in src/lisp.mk? That seems to fly in the face of the commentary at the beginning of loadup.el, which says to add them to lisp.mk, and also contradicts the current convention of byte-compiling everything, even if not strictly speaking necessary. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] Incidentally, is it OK that cp51932.el and eucjp-ms.el are loaded as uncompiled Lisp files, but are not in src/lisp.mk? That seems to fly in the face of the commentary at the beginning of loadup.el, which says to add them to lisp.mk, and also contradicts the current convention of byte-compiling everything, even if not strictly speaking necessary. Also, charprop.el is loaded uncompiled, but its doc strings do not follow the conventions required by make-docfile.c. We are lucky that none of charprop.el's forms are recognizable by make-docfile.c. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 20 21:23:03 2012 Received: (at 12395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2012 01:23:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53644 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPkFq-0001VU-UL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:23:03 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:45852 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPkFp-0001V5-3u for 12395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:23:01 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPkEC-0005RS-RE; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:21:20 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12395: 24.2.50; `C-h f emacs-version' ignores doc string; gives no information References: <87bohc1uwe.fsf@altern.org> <717A900B9B0849AA933E921F5872D027@us.oracle.com> <87mwzhznue.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83a9vhzecy.fsf@gnu.org> <838vb1zce0.fsf@gnu.org> <833919zauo.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: Zachawi South Africa Indigo mania Cohiba Mossad high X-Ran: =P>eCN,bs't6sbQE6?zp?r;7cI5(fHmwX X-Hue: magenta X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:21:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <833919zauo.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:39:11 +0200") Message-ID: <1zpq4c39in.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12395 Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Kenichi Handa X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Incidentally, is it OK that cp51932.el and eucjp-ms.el are loaded as > uncompiled Lisp files, but are not in src/lisp.mk? No, they should be there, well spotted. I imagine they were missed because they are not in loadup.el, rather loaded by something that is. (As an aside, that can be somewhat confusing, as this shows. Maybe it would be better to move them to loadup.el. Same for term/internal.) They don't contain any useful doc strings, so that does not matter, but the rule for the Emacs binary in src/Makefile should depend on them. > Also, charprop.el is loaded uncompiled, but its doc strings do not > follow the conventions required by make-docfile.c. We are lucky that > none of charprop.el's forms are recognizable by make-docfile.c. I don't see any reason _not_ to compile these 3 files. It seems generated files are usually not compiled, but these ones are in the repository. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 03 10:06:39 2012 Received: (at 12395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2012 14:06:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUeMw-0006aZ-Sd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:06:39 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:41993) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUeMt-0006aQ-P9 for 12395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:06:37 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MCW00H00Z3K9M00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 12395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:02:49 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MCX00GFT0CPXPE0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:02:49 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:02:39 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12395: 24.2.50; `C-h f emacs-version' ignores doc string; gives no information In-reply-to: <1zpq4c39in.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Glenn Morris Message-id: <83625m6ayo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bohc1uwe.fsf@altern.org> <717A900B9B0849AA933E921F5872D027@us.oracle.com> <87mwzhznue.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83a9vhzecy.fsf@gnu.org> <838vb1zce0.fsf@gnu.org> <833919zauo.fsf@gnu.org> <1zpq4c39in.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Stefan Monnier , 12395@debbugs.gnu.org, Kenichi Handa > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:21:20 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Incidentally, is it OK that cp51932.el and eucjp-ms.el are loaded as > > uncompiled Lisp files, but are not in src/lisp.mk? > > No, they should be there, well spotted. I imagine they were missed > because they are not in loadup.el, rather loaded by something that is. > (As an aside, that can be somewhat confusing, as this shows. Maybe it > would be better to move them to loadup.el. Same for term/internal.) [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12395 Cc: 12395@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, handa@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Stefan Monnier , 12395@debbugs.gnu.org, Kenichi Handa > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:21:20 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Incidentally, is it OK that cp51932.el and eucjp-ms.el are loaded as > > uncompiled Lisp files, but are not in src/lisp.mk? > > No, they should be there, well spotted. I imagine they were missed > because they are not in loadup.el, rather loaded by something that is. > (As an aside, that can be somewhat confusing, as this shows. Maybe it > would be better to move them to loadup.el. Same for term/internal.) [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4973] > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Stefan Monnier , 12395@debbugs.gnu.org, Kenichi Handa > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:21:20 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Incidentally, is it OK that cp51932.el and eucjp-ms.el are loaded as > > uncompiled Lisp files, but are not in src/lisp.mk? > > No, they should be there, well spotted. I imagine they were missed > because they are not in loadup.el, rather loaded by something that is. > (As an aside, that can be somewhat confusing, as this shows. Maybe it > would be better to move them to loadup.el. Same for term/internal.) I fixed the term/internal issue in revision 110772 on the emacs-24 branch, as part of catching up with the MSDOS build. From unknown Sun Sep 07 18:03:20 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator