GNU bug report logs -
#12357
24.2; list-load-path-shadow should ignore .dir-locals.el
Previous Next
Reported by: Johan Claesson <johanclaesson <at> bredband.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:54:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Found in version 24.2
Fixed in version 24.4
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Well i would like the false positives to go away. That is the problem
this attempts to fix.
How about a defvar load-path-shadows-report-dir-locals instead?
It would of course be true by default to preserve legacy behaviour.
Regards,
/Johan
Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com> writes:
> On 2014-03-05 06:29 +0800, Johan Claesson wrote:
>> * emacs-lisp/shadows.el (load-path-shadows-find): Do not report
>> .dir-locals.el files.
>> (list-dir-locals-shadows): New command that reports shadows of
>> .dir-locals.el in a way that make sense for that type of file.
>> (dir-locals-shadows-find, dir-locals-shadows-find-1)
>> (dir-locals-class-name, dir-locals-shadows-display): Auxiliary
>> functions for list-dir-locals-shadows.
>
> I am not too sure what problems are solved by the change.
>
> In the case of list-load-path-shadows, it should print anything when in
> doubt since false positives can be helpful. So it is not entirely wrong
> to report .dir-locals.el.
>
> Use .dir-locals.el in a child directory to shadow parent directory isn't
> uncommon practice. In future we might even make it capable of inheriting
> settings in parent directory. So I am not even sure the use case of
> listing .dir-locals files (defaulting to the load-path)??
>
> Leo
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 84 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.