GNU bug report logs - #12312
Feature Request: du -h or du --si sort by human readable value

Previous Next

Full log

Message #7 received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: kat amsterdam <kat.amsterdam <at> gmail.com>
Cc: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 12312-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#12312: Feature Request: du -h or du --si sort by human
	readable value
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:20:32 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

tag 12312 notabug
thanks

On 08/30/2012 11:39 AM, kat amsterdam wrote:
> Hi GNU core utility developers:
> 
> First of all thank you very much for developing the software that we have
> come to rely on. It's well appreciated!

Thank you.

> 
> I have a feature request based on a question that was asked on askubuntu.com
> 
> the question is: why does du -h  not sort by the human readable value.

du(1) doesn't sort, you use sort(1) for sorting.

> 1) du returns random sort order
> *du -h /home/user/Photos*

to get it in sorted order,

du -h /home/user/Photos* | sort -k1,1h


> 2) du returns sorted by number but not by acutal value in this example G is
> large than M and M is larger than K
> *du -h /home/user/Photos | sort -n *

Don't use sort -n, use sort -h.

> 
> Please add a sorting function to du -h and du --si to sort the human
> readable values to make your wonderful utility even more useful.
> 

We already have: sort -h, in coreutils 7.5 (2009).  Therefore, I'm
closing this bug.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake <at> redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.