Subject: Re: bug#1229: generate-new-buffer-name could be more efficient

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 09:58:30 -0400

> Something like the following?

Yes.

> +       sprintf (number, "-%"pD"d", Frandom (make_number (999999)));

I don't like this arbitrary constant.  Maybe we could use something
like "N * Flength (Vbuffer_alist)".

        Stefan