Subject: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode

From: Paul Eggert <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:50:51 -0700

On 08/21/2012 09:58 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> That is the expected behavior.

It's not the behavior *I* expect.  I expect
'sleep' to use realtime seconds, not seconds
of some arbitrary clock that's way far from
real time.

I've taken the liberty of reopening this one,
for further discussion.