GNU bug report logs - #12149
24.1; `C-h f' is worse and worse at telling where a function was defined

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 17:58:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #11 received at 12149 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 12149 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#12149: 24.1;
 `C-h f' is worse and worse at telling where a function was defined
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:20:14 +0200
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

> In Emacs prior to Emacs 23, `C-h f' did not point to the wrong files
> as having defined these function.  At least it did not lie and steer
> you wrong.
>
> Emacs 23.4 did not point to the wrong file for `y-or-n-p', but it did
> point to the wrong file for `top-level'.
>
> Emacs 24.1 gets them both wrong.  It simply gives the original location
> (from emacs -Q) for each of them: `C source code' for `top-level' and
> `subr.el' for `y-or-n-p'.  This is not good.  Better to say "no idea"
> than to mislead the user this way.

(progn
  (defun yes-or-no-p (prompt) (y-or-n-p prompt))
  (describe-function  'yes-or-no-p))

=>

yes-or-no-p is a Lisp function.

(yes-or-no-p PROMPT)

Not documented.

So I seem to be unable to reproduce this bug.  Are you still seeing it?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 106 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.