GNU bug report logs - #1212
23.0.60; split-string-and-unquote problems

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:10:04 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #90 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> suse.de>, emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org,
        1212 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#1212: 23.0.60; split-string-and-unquote problems
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:11:10 -0400
>     *** `split-string-and-unquote' does (what?)
>     *** `combine-and-quote-strings' does (what?)

AFAIK, these two functions are meant to:

- provide a way to specify any list of strings within a single string
  (i.e. it needs to provide some separators and some way to quote the
  separators), using a format that's simple to type for the end user.
- be inverse of each other; more precisely
  (equal STR (split-string-and-unquote (combine-and-quote-strings STR)))
  this is also stipulated in the docstring of split-string-and-unquote.

As the docstring of split-string-and-unquote explains, the quoting used
is the same as the one used for ELisp strings.

I could have used sh-style quoting or csh-style, or any other style, but
csh-style is nasty, sh-style is too powerful (what should we do with
backquotes and $(...)), and ELisp is what Emacs uses already and it's
reasonably simple and we know it handles all cases reasonably well, so
it seemed like an OK choice.


        Stefan




This bug report was last modified 14 years and 164 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.