GNU bug report logs - #12099
Remove out of date example code in woman.el

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:03:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Bastien <bzg <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 12099 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 12099 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#12099; Package emacs. (Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
To: bug-emacs <bug-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Remove out of date example code in woman.el
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:55:32 +0100
woman.el contains the following bit of documentation:

;; The following is based on suggestions by Guy Gascoigne-Piggford and
;; Juanma Barranquero.  If you really want to square the man-woman
;; circle then you might care to define the following bash function in
;; .bashrc:

;;   man() { gnudoit -q '(raise-frame (selected-frame)) (woman' \"$1\" ')' ; }

;; If you use Microsoft COMMAND.COM then you can create a file called
;; man.bat somewhere in your path containing the two lines:

;;   @echo off
;;   gnudoit -q (raise-frame (selected-frame)) (woman \"%1\")

;; and then (e.g. from a command prompt or the Run... option in the
;; Start menu) just execute

;;   man man_page_name

This is cute, but gnudoit no longer exists, and this code is far from
complete (see the recent discussion on making Emacs a replacement for
standalone info on gnu-prog-discuss). I suggest simply removing the
above from woman.el.

-- 
http://rrt.sc3d.org




Reply sent to Bastien <bzg <at> gnu.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:40:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:40:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 12099-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Bastien <bzg <at> gnu.org>
To: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
Cc: 12099-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#12099: Remove out of date example code in woman.el
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:32:37 +0200
Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org> writes:

> This is cute, but gnudoit no longer exists, and this code is far from
> complete (see the recent discussion on making Emacs a replacement for
> standalone info on gnu-prog-discuss). I suggest simply removing the
> above from woman.el.

Done.

-- 
 Bastien




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:24:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 13 years and 11 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.