From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:15:57 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#12079 <12079@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#12079 <12079@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 23.3; erroneous byte-compile-file warning Reply-To: bug#12079 <12079@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 01:15:57 +0000 retitle 12079 23.3; erroneous byte-compile-file warning reassign 12079 emacs submitter 12079 Winston severity 12079 minor tag 12079 notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 28 14:11:00 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jul 2012 18:11:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47019 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvBTf-00013l-Pl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 14:11:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32988) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sv8Dp-0003r2-BY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:42:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sv86z-0005uf-LZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:35:22 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:36713) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sv86z-0005ub-IQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:35:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45319) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sv86y-0007Ig-BD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:35:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sv86w-0005to-1r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:35:20 -0400 Received: from smtp2.sccoast.net ([66.153.203.174]:57973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sv86v-0005tS-Sp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:35:17 -0400 Received: from mail.psr.com ([67.212.42.216]:12182 helo=psr.com) by smtp2.sccoast.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sv7ZF-0007ir-3Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:00:29 -0400 Received: (from wbe@localhost) by psr.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q6SE0W6M063329; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:00:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe@crystal.psr.com) From: Winston To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 23.3; erroneous byte-compile-file warning Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:00:31 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 14:10:59 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) GNU Emacs 23.3.1 (amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0, GTK+ Version 2.24.6) of 2011-12-05 It looks like byte-compile-file is issuing a bogus warning for (set-buffer) inside (save-excursion). 1) The internal description of (save-excursion) says it saves and restores point, mark, and the current buffer (just as it's always done). Here's the relevant part of the description (with -->). save-excursion is a special form in `C source code'. (save-excursion &rest BODY) Save point, mark, and current buffer; execute BODY; restore those things. Executes BODY just like `progn'. --> The values of point, mark and the current buffer are restored even in case of abnormal exit (throw or error). The state of activation of the mark is also restored. 2) This trivial example, run from buffer *scratch*, agrees with that description, that the current buffer gets restored: (progn (save-excursion (set-buffer "foo") ; I'd already created this (barf-if-buffer-read-only) ) (current-buffer) ) # 3) However, when I write that code to foo.el and run byte-compile-file on it, I get the following error: Compiling file /home/wbe/foo.el at Sat Jul 28 09:07:28 2012 Entering directory `/home/wbe/' --> foo.el:1:1:Warning: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer' It looks to me like the Warning message is untrue. -WBE [The rest is from (report-emacs-bug). I removed some clearly irrelevant parts.] In GNU Emacs 23.3.1 (amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0, GTK+ Version 2.24.6) of 2011-12-05 on jail-15 Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10707000 configured using `configure '--localstatedir=/var' '--with-x-toolkit=gtk' '--x-libraries=/usr/local/lib' '--x-includes=/usr/local/include' '--prefix=/usr/local' '--mandir=/usr/local/man' '--infodir=/usr/local/info/' '--build=amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0' 'build_alias=amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0' 'CC=cc' 'CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing' 'LDFLAGS= -L/usr/local/lib -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib' 'CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include' 'CPP=cpp'' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: iso_8859_1 value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: C value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: iso-latin-1-unix default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Message Minor modes in effect: mml-mode: t gnus-message-citation-mode: t tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t abbrev-mode: t [...] Load-path shadows: /home/wbe/lib/info hides /usr/local/share/emacs/23.3/lisp/info Features: (shadow emacsbug info gnus-fun warnings compile comint debug apropos pp etags ring html2text browse-url newcomment novice rect flow-fill gnus-cite smiley ansi-color mail-extr gnus-bcklg gnus-async byte-opt bytecomp byte-compile gnus-ml disp-table parse-time timezone nndraft nnmh auth-source gnus-agent gnus-srvr gnus-score score-mode nnvirtual gnus-msg gnus-art mm-uu mml2015 pgg pgg-parse pgg-def epg-config mm-view smime dig nntp gnus-cache gnus-sum nnoo gnus-group gnus-undo nnmail mail-source format-spec gnus-start gnus-spec gnus-int gnus-range message sendmail regexp-opt ecomplete rfc822 mml mml-sec password-cache mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mailcap mail-parse rfc2231 rfc2047 rfc2045 qp ietf-drums mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader canlock sha1 hex-util hashcash gnus-win gnus gnus-ems nnheader gnus-util netrc time-date mail-utils mm-util mail-prsvr sort multi-isearch kmacro two-column iso-transl help-mode view hexl eldoc help-fns cus-edit easymenu cus-start cus-load wid-edit tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel x-win x-dnd font-setting tool-bar dnd fontset image fringe lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mldrag mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev loaddefs button minibuffer faces cus-face files text-properties overlay md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process dbusbind system-font-setting font-render-setting gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty emacs) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 29 19:20:01 2012 Received: (at 12079) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2012 23:20:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49469 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvcmG-0001hx-Sd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:20:01 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33252) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvcmE-0001hq-N0 for 12079@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:19:59 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvcfH-000512-Gc; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:12:47 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Winston Subject: Re: bug#12079: 23.3; erroneous byte-compile-file warning References: X-Spook: Craig Livingstone Qaddafi halcon Europol Vince Foster Al X-Ran: ^Yy,I1wnm!JvycQntVz[n`Xy*|$WZyf=3KVSr.cq#Ad%5LgW^*+[pIqB-z[2}lHaH=HPam X-Hue: magenta X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:12:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Winston's message of "Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:00:31 -0400") Message-ID: <871ujucgb4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12079 Cc: 12079@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Winston wrote: > (progn > (save-excursion > (set-buffer "foo") ; I'd already created this > (barf-if-buffer-read-only) > ) > (current-buffer) > ) > # > > 3) However, when I write that code to foo.el and run byte-compile-file > on it, I get the following error: > > Compiling file /home/wbe/foo.el at Sat Jul 28 09:07:28 2012 > Entering directory `/home/wbe/' > --> foo.el:1:1:Warning: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer' > > It looks to me like the Warning message is untrue. In an example such as you show, you should use with-current-buffer instead of save-excursion+set-buffer. I think this has been discussed several times on this list and/or emacs-devel. The compilation warning is because save-excursion is pointless in the code as shown. Eg it doesn't preserve point in buffer foo (unless foo happened to be current beforehand). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 29 19:20:15 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2012 23:20:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49472 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvcmU-0001ih-Rk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:20:15 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33253) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvcmS-0001ia-PV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:20:13 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvcfW-00051a-Ej for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:13:02 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:13:02 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 12079 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) tag 12079 notabug close 12079 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 30 00:49:56 2012 Received: (at 12079) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jul 2012 04:49:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49774 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvhvX-0003HP-SQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:49:56 -0400 Received: from smtp1.sccoast.net ([66.153.203.168]:33963) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvhvU-0003HH-Nf for 12079@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:49:53 -0400 Received: from mail.psr.com ([67.212.42.216]:21071 helo=psr.com) by smtp1.sccoast.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SvhoW-0004aj-Rq; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:42:40 -0400 Received: (from wbe@localhost) by psr.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q6U4ggK9071139; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:42:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe) Message-Id: <201207300442.q6U4ggK9071139@psr.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:42 EDT From: Winston Subject: Re: bug#12079: 23.3; erroneous byte-compile-file warning To: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12079 Cc: 12079@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) I originally submitted (in part): >> (progn >> (save-excursion >> (set-buffer "foo") ; I'd already created this >> (barf-if-buffer-read-only) >> ) >> (current-buffer) >> ) >> # >> >> 3) However, when I write that code to foo.el and run byte-compile-file >> on it, I get the following error: >> >> Compiling file /home/wbe/foo.el at Sat Jul 28 09:07:28 2012 >> Entering directory `/home/wbe/' >> --> foo.el:1:1:Warning: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer' >> >> It looks to me like the Warning message is untrue. to which Glenn replied: > In an example such as you show, you should use with-current-buffer > instead of save-excursion+set-buffer. OK. Back when the code I was compiling was written, with-current-buffer didn't exist. After reading the description of with-current-buffer, yes, it looks like it would be as good or better than save-excursion if I feel like rewriting the code. > I think this has been discussed several times on this list and/or > emacs-devel. I wouldn't know. I'm not on that list. > The compilation warning is because save-excursion is pointless in the > code as shown. I disagree. When the body finishes, save-excursion changes back to the buffer that was current when it was called. Perhaps it's useless in a trivial example like the one above, but "return to whatever the current buffer is after making changes in some other buffer" can be useful in subroutines. Restoring the buffer is certainly not "pointless". I think what you're trying to say is that using save-excursion instead of with-current-buffer when the body begins with set-buffer is "pointless" because save-excursion does nothing more than what with-current-buffer would do. That's a fair point, but that's NOT what the warning message says. The warning claims that save-excursion won't work. > Eg it doesn't preserve point in buffer foo (unless foo happened to be > current beforehand). Irrelevant. You've agreed that save-excursion works exactly as the documentation claims, restoring on exit the buffer, point, and mark as of the time it was called, so the clear English meaning of the warning is false -- no part of save-excursion's functionality was "defeated" by calling set-buffer. I recommend the current misleading warning be replaced with a suggestion that using with-current-buffer would be more efficient, which is apparently what was intended. -WBE From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 30 03:13:46 2012 Received: (at 12079) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jul 2012 07:13:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49831 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvkAj-0006UH-IX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 03:13:46 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.213.172]:52325) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvkAh-0006UA-0O for 12079@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 03:13:44 -0400 Received: by yenq13 with SMTP id q13so4400454yen.3 for <12079@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:06:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WMXcjXwHZqhqIOJOEHhuzS/8LpVE4HJv7YbLS8xWdns=; b=yEZNz8g7QmRoTLOEj6mDzVafZ7L8/OjdFT+GEL0vRsKn9Cxrg4AIn3b5FhbkZSl7Lr JdAISXLYR9uLJ46lfbz7dJunfB5BCPMHJZljdWn0bLUJBYlg/dwLIj9ZTmcwmvYhMnmf fse0fzOt+1MGSPQeaLXzhu/TQjvkRA0ZFThBxF4OaKkkfJlaK5PuoV13IR/yVSMoTZx0 TW3HUgPX4Ybr4FqMqKs3PsttVGWUePlXvNcE8Iwm8zwf1eI5J6M6BD8dF+lR3AimiIQ/ raWZ55usBXRpfnQ1OTaaR4MwvdE7OsXLwZJGVHBpS1SKIJW83Oml7lE8yQ2PHpE/nXcr 4HuA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.197.232 with SMTP id ix8mr7555684igc.73.1343631990008; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.142.70 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:06:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201207300442.q6U4ggK9071139@psr.com> References: <201207300442.q6U4ggK9071139@psr.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 03:06:29 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12079: 23.3; erroneous byte-compile-file warning From: Alp Aker To: Winston Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12079 Cc: Glenn Morris , 12079@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Winston wrote: > I recommend the current misleading warning be replaced with a suggestion > that using with-current-buffer would be more efficient, which is > apparently what was intended. The warning message was changed in just that way over a year ago. If you upgrade to v24.1 the warning you'll see is "Use `with-current-buffer' rather than save-excursion+set-buffer". From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 30 09:47:38 2012 Received: (at 12079) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jul 2012 13:47:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50322 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvqJu-00010c-5X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:47:38 -0400 Received: from smtp2.sccoast.net ([66.153.203.174]:32798) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvqJs-00010V-FM for 12079@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:47:37 -0400 Received: from mail.psr.com ([67.212.42.216]:22603 helo=psr.com) by smtp2.sccoast.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SvqCs-00038B-FN; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:40:22 -0400 Received: (from wbe@localhost) by psr.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q6UDeN0q072988; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:40:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe) Message-Id: <201207301340.q6UDeN0q072988@psr.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:40 EDT From: Winston Subject: Re: bug#12079: 23.3; erroneous byte-compile-file warning To: Alp Aker X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12079 Cc: 12079@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > The warning message was changed in just that way over a year ago. If > you upgrade to v24.1 the warning you'll see is "Use > `with-current-buffer' rather than save-excursion+set-buffer". Sounds good. bug#12079 is resolved, then. -WBE From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 30 12:43:32 2012 Received: (at 12079-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jul 2012 16:43:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51185 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Svt47-00059K-9k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:43:31 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.213.44]:37259) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Svt43-00059A-9b for 12079-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:43:27 -0400 Received: by yhq56 with SMTP id 56so4927671yhq.3 for <12079-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:36:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=uqqt0g+uibvmg6P33MEsyKYgkWnnHXnKcocPBuJ27wY=; b=jrFlkxrjdhUL+tXpZyBU5CYZVSjAAFBM3C13DQo3BbOjShD3pwZ44yhaAVcI33cExY tSO6qqMlwtlEmLJyoA28SNLgle1FOdUA4n1KEWUaHYcX7Dr1Xvicks90xxLESPusJ/MX GqYDJg//GIvwuBrpXhRu19iwOuzE3guxxn0KwvxZdADAMdGfz0kaAlyo7fNXwYT5scLw isUiA3R5IgTfuAJn/CHeuMIZ0XerYUVDce2Hcyifrwc/XmzrlzWXboOuLlFV9GfF8Zvg nvg87qKZ71ugkWvM8s1271viyJebiUdwenwYlL8ohj0srCY4bPcc5YOUdIoSQiCeaMi5 6TfQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.171.3 with SMTP id aq3mr11553834igc.65.1343666172670; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.142.70 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:36:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201207301340.q6UDeN0q072988@psr.com> References: <201207301340.q6UDeN0q072988@psr.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:36:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12079: 23.3; erroneous byte-compile-file warning From: Alp Aker Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12079-done Cc: 12079-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Winston wrote: >> The warning message was changed in just that way over a year ago. If >> you upgrade to v24.1 the warning you'll see is "Use >> `with-current-buffer' rather than save-excursion+set-buffer". > > Sounds good. bug#12079 is resolved, then. Closing. From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:15:57 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator