GNU bug report logs -
#1201
Another overlay display bug
Previous Next
Reported by: rms <at> gnu.org
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:10:06 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 1201 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 1201 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded to
bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
:
bug#1201
; Package
emacs
.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to
rms <at> gnu.org
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
Here's another bug that was reported a year ago
which I think should not be forgotten.
From: Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
To: emacs-devel <at> gnu.org
Subject: Another overlay display bug
Reply-To: rms <at> gnu.org
Message-Id: <E1IjVDM-0001BJ-AH <at> fencepost.gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:19:14 -0500
Would someone please fix this, then ack?
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
From: Joe Wells <jbw <at> macs.hw.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:43:43 +0100
In-Reply-To: <86k5pi9wrg.fsf <at> macs.hw.ac.uk> (Joe Wells's message of "Sat\,
20 Oct 2007 06\:32\:19 +0100")
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Subject: Re: two display bugs involving interactions between after-string
and display properties of adjacent overlays
Joe Wells <jbw <at> macs.hw.ac.uk> writes:
> Here are two more display bugs I found while trying to improve the
> code in tex-fold.el in AUCTeX.
Here is a third such bug.
> These bugs involve interactions between after-string and display
> properties of adjacent overlays.
Ditto.
> I'm assuming this macro in my reproduction code below:
>
> (defmacro test-in-fresh-buffer-and-window (&rest body)
> `(progn
> (delete-other-windows)
> (kill-buffer (get-buffer-create "xyzzy"))
> (let ((xyzzy-buf (get-buffer-create "xyzzy")))
> (set-buffer xyzzy-buf)
> (display-buffer xyzzy-buf)
> ,@body
> )))
Ditto.
> BUG #1: ...
> BUG #2: ...
BUG #3: An overlay's after-string property is not displayed if an
immediately following overlay has the empty string as its display
property.
Reproduce with this expression:
(test-in-fresh-buffer-and-window
(insert "ABCD")
(let ((o1 (make-overlay 2 3))
(o2 (make-overlay 3 4)))
(overlay-put o1 'after-string "1")
(overlay-put o2 'display "")))
The above expression should display ?AB1D?.
The above expression wrongly actually displays ?ABD?.
> ======================================================================
> In GNU Emacs 22.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.20) ...
Same details as in last message.
I hope this bug report is helpful.
--
Joe
Information forwarded to
bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
:
bug#1201
; Package
emacs
.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to
Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to
Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 1201 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
Note: this is discussed at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-02/msg02997.html
Information forwarded to
bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
:
bug#1201
; Package
emacs
.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to
Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to
Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #15 received at 1201 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
> Note: this is discussed at
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-02/msg02997.html
The original bug that led to the problematic checkin is here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-05/msg00580.html
Reply sent to
Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 1201-done <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
I've checked in a fix.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <don <at> donarmstrong.com>
to
internal_control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
.
(Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 16 years and 271 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.