GNU bug report logs -
#11994
sort(1) doesn't say SEE ALSO uniq(1)
Previous Next
Reported by: jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:01:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #13 received at 11994-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Erik Auerswald wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:54:21AM +0800, jidanni <at> jidanni.org wrote:
>> sort(1) doesn't say SEE ALSO uniq(1), and vice versa.
>
> The small attached patch adds that.
...
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: mention uniq(1) in sort(1) man-page and vice versa
>
> * man/sort.x: Add SEE ALSO section with entry uniq(1).
> * man/uniq.x: Add sort(1) to SEE ALSO section.
> ---
> man/sort.x | 2 ++
> man/uniq.x | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/man/sort.x b/man/sort.x
> index 5c171dd..b0d4a1a 100644
> --- a/man/sort.x
> +++ b/man/sort.x
> @@ -2,3 +2,5 @@
> sort \- sort lines of text files
> [DESCRIPTION]
> .\" Add any additional description here
> +[SEE ALSO]
> +uniq(1)
> diff --git a/man/uniq.x b/man/uniq.x
> index 98a95f9..013cef3 100644
> --- a/man/uniq.x
> +++ b/man/uniq.x
> @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ uniq \- report or omit repeated lines
> [DESCRIPTION]
> .\" Add any additional description here
> [SEE ALSO]
> -comm(1), join(1)
> +comm(1), join(1), sort(1)
Thanks to both of you. Applied and pushed.
If I'd waited a minute or two more, I would have thanked
Dan (jidanni) for the suggestion in the commit log.
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 308 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.