GNU bug report logs -
#11952
can't compile latest emacs from git repo (msys)
Previous Next
Reported by: dennis <at> conus.info
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:26:04 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 11952 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 11952 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#11952
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:26:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
dennis <at> conus.info
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:26:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi.
$ uname -a
MINGW32_NT-6.1 COMPUTER 1.0.17(0.48/3/2) 2011-04-24 23:39 i686 Msys
.. while make bootstrap:
==
In toplevel form:
quail/indian.el:59:1:Error: Invalid read syntax: "?"
make[2]: *** [quail/indian.elc] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/Administrator/emacs/leim'
make[1]: *** [all-other-dirs-gmake] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/Administrator/emacs/nt'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
==
Here is an UTF-8 (?) characters at this position in the indian.el file.
What should I fix to compile emacs?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#11952
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:20:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:52:10 +0300
> From: Dennis Yurichev <dennis <at> conus.info>
>
> $ uname -a
> MINGW32_NT-6.1 COMPUTER 1.0.17(0.48/3/2) 2011-04-24 23:39 i686 Msys
>
> .. while make bootstrap:
>
> ==
> In toplevel form:
> quail/indian.el:59:1:Error: Invalid read syntax: "?"
> make[2]: *** [quail/indian.elc] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/Administrator/emacs/leim'
> make[1]: *** [all-other-dirs-gmake] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/Administrator/emacs/nt'
> make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
> ==
>
> Here is an UTF-8 (?) characters at this position in the indian.el file.
> What should I fix to compile emacs?
Can you compile indian.el by hand, from the shell prompt? If so, just
say "make compile" afterwards.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#11952
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Dennis Yurichev <dennis <at> conus.info> writes:
> In toplevel form:
> quail/indian.el:59:1:Error: Invalid read syntax: "?"
That's an indication that the file could not be properly decoded.
You'll have to find out why.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#11952
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:45:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 16.07.2012 19:13, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> $ uname -a
>> MINGW32_NT-6.1 COMPUTER 1.0.17(0.48/3/2) 2011-04-24 23:39 i686 Msys
>>
>> .. while make bootstrap:
>>
>> ==
>> In toplevel form:
>> quail/indian.el:59:1:Error: Invalid read syntax: "?"
>> make[2]: *** [quail/indian.elc] Error 1
>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/Administrator/emacs/leim'
>> make[1]: *** [all-other-dirs-gmake] Error 2
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/Administrator/emacs/nt'
>> make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
>> ==
>>
>> Here is an UTF-8 (?) characters at this position in the indian.el file.
>> What should I fix to compile emacs?
>
> Can you compile indian.el by hand, from the shell prompt? If so, just
> say "make compile" afterwards.
Yes, when I (successfully) compiled the file in emacs
(byte-compile-file), I can continue "make bootstrap" after..
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#11952
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:58:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:37:51 +0300
> From: Dennis Yurichev <dennis <at> conus.info>
> CC: 11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
>
> > Can you compile indian.el by hand, from the shell prompt? If so, just
> > say "make compile" afterwards.
>
> Yes, when I (successfully) compiled the file in emacs
> (byte-compile-file), I can continue "make bootstrap" after..
In which Emacs was that? in the same one that was generated as part of
the bootstrap, or in another one?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#11952
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 17.07.2012 18:51, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> Can you compile indian.el by hand, from the shell prompt? If so, just
>>> say "make compile" afterwards.
>>
>> Yes, when I (successfully) compiled the file in emacs
>> (byte-compile-file), I can continue "make bootstrap" after..
>
> In which Emacs was that? in the same one that was generated as part of
> the bootstrap, or in another one?
The problem I described in my original post was with latest source code
from git repo + MinGW.
I successfully compiled the .el file using precompiled emacs win32 from
this archive:
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-24.1-bin-i386.zip
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#11952
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:29:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:53:31 +0300
> From: Dennis Yurichev <dennis <at> conus.info>
> CC: 11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
>
> On 17.07.2012 18:51, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >>> Can you compile indian.el by hand, from the shell prompt? If so, just
> >>> say "make compile" afterwards.
> >>
> >> Yes, when I (successfully) compiled the file in emacs
> >> (byte-compile-file), I can continue "make bootstrap" after..
> >
> > In which Emacs was that? in the same one that was generated as part of
> > the bootstrap, or in another one?
>
> The problem I described in my original post was with latest source code
> from git repo + MinGW.
> I successfully compiled the .el file using precompiled emacs win32 from
> this archive:
> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-24.1-bin-i386.zip
And if you try the same with emacs.exe generated as part of the
bootstrap?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#11952
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:32:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 17.07.2012 19:22, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>>> Can you compile indian.el by hand, from the shell prompt? If so, just
>>>>> say "make compile" afterwards.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, when I (successfully) compiled the file in emacs
>>>> (byte-compile-file), I can continue "make bootstrap" after..
>>>
>>> In which Emacs was that? in the same one that was generated as part of
>>> the bootstrap, or in another one?
>>
>> The problem I described in my original post was with latest source code
>> from git repo + MinGW.
>> I successfully compiled the .el file using precompiled emacs win32 from
>> this archive:
>> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-24.1-bin-i386.zip
>
> And if you try the same with emacs.exe generated as part of the
> bootstrap?
Just tried with my fresh compiled emacs.exe: the file compiled successfully.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#11952
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 17.07.2012 19:22, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>>> Can you compile indian.el by hand, from the shell prompt? If so, just
>>>>> say "make compile" afterwards.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, when I (successfully) compiled the file in emacs
>>>> (byte-compile-file), I can continue "make bootstrap" after..
>>>
>>> In which Emacs was that? in the same one that was generated as part of
>>> the bootstrap, or in another one?
>>
>> The problem I described in my original post was with latest source code
>> from git repo + MinGW.
>> I successfully compiled the .el file using precompiled emacs win32 from
>> this archive:
>> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-24.1-bin-i386.zip
>
> And if you try the same with emacs.exe generated as part of the
> bootstrap?
If anyone like the idea, I can setup windows + mingw in VMware so you
can test it on your side...
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#11952
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:10:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #32 received at 11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Dennis Yurichev <dennis <at> conus.info> writes:
> On 17.07.2012 19:22, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>>>> Can you compile indian.el by hand, from the shell prompt? If so, just
>>>>>> say "make compile" afterwards.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, when I (successfully) compiled the file in emacs
>>>>> (byte-compile-file), I can continue "make bootstrap" after..
>>>>
>>>> In which Emacs was that? in the same one that was generated as part of
>>>> the bootstrap, or in another one?
>>>
>>> The problem I described in my original post was with latest source code
>>> from git repo + MinGW.
>>> I successfully compiled the .el file using precompiled emacs win32 from
>>> this archive:
>>> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-24.1-bin-i386.zip
>>
>> And if you try the same with emacs.exe generated as part of the
>> bootstrap?
>
> Just tried with my fresh compiled emacs.exe: the file compiled successfully.
So is this problem resolved now?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#11952
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 25 Dec 2015 23:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #35 received at 11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> Dennis Yurichev <dennis <at> conus.info> writes:
>
>> On 17.07.2012 19:22, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>>>>> Can you compile indian.el by hand, from the shell prompt? If so, just
>>>>>>> say "make compile" afterwards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, when I (successfully) compiled the file in emacs
>>>>>> (byte-compile-file), I can continue "make bootstrap" after..
>>>>>
>>>>> In which Emacs was that? in the same one that was generated as part of
>>>>> the bootstrap, or in another one?
>>>>
>>>> The problem I described in my original post was with latest source code
>>>> from git repo + MinGW.
>>>> I successfully compiled the .el file using precompiled emacs win32 from
>>>> this archive:
>>>> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-24.1-bin-i386.zip
>>>
>>> And if you try the same with emacs.exe generated as part of the
>>> bootstrap?
>>
>> Just tried with my fresh compiled emacs.exe: the file compiled successfully.
>
> So is this problem resolved now?
More information was requested, but no response was given within a few
months, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists,
please reopen this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug closed, send any further explanations to
11952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and dennis <at> conus.info
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 25 Dec 2015 23:20:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 9 years and 208 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.