Subject: Re: bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:57:09 -0400

> Sure, attached; this assumes the earlier patch in
> <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11935#5>
> has been applied and merged.

I'm not sure I understand what it does.  It seems to define XLI first as
a macro then as a function.  Is that right?
If so, why is it any better than using only the macro form?

        Stefan