Subject: bug#11906: 24.1; completion-at-point failures

From: Leo Liu <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 11:30:45 +0800

On 2013-05-14 10:53 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Makes no sense to me: the completion-table object should always be
> "trivial" to build.  At least, that's always been the case so far.

OK. In that case I'll leave this off for now until I have more time to
go through minibuffer.el.

Leo