Subject: bug#11906: 24.1; completion-at-point failures

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 22:53:37 -0400

>> I do not understand what that variable would do.  Can you give some
>> more details?
> Places that need no completion table should bind
> completion-requires-no-table to t before calling the
> completion-at-point-functions.

Makes no sense to me: the completion-table object should always be
"trivial" to build.  At least, that's always been the case so far.

        Stefan