Subject: bug#11906: 24.1; completion-at-point failures

From: Leo Liu <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:28:23 +0800

On 2013-05-11 22:51 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> The completion-at-point-functions are called repeatedly (once after each
> command) to get the start/end, yes.  But not the completion-table.

How about a special variable `completion-requires-no-table' that costly
completion functions can take advantage of the opportunity?

Leo