Subject: Re: bug#11906: 24.1; completion-at-point failures

From: Andreas Röhler <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 22:18:07 +0200

Am 11.05.2013 06:47, schrieb Leo Liu:
> On 2013-05-11 11:40 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> But the generic completion code can't easily go down to a single call
>> in the general case.
>
> OK, if that is the case.
>
> I seem to recall that sometimes completion functions are invoked for
> getting the start and end positions only. Maybe this is an opportunity
> for optimisation.
>
> Leo
>
>
>
>

Hi Leo,

from what I've seen some weeks ago, just signaling my interest. Seems a promising point to push things forwards.

Thanks all,

Andreas