Subject: bug#11906: 24.1; completion-at-point failures

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 10:51:56 -0400

>> But the generic completion code can't easily go down to a single call
>> in the general case.
> OK, if that is the case.
> I seem to recall that sometimes completion functions are invoked for
> getting the start and end positions only.

The completion-at-point-functions are called repeatedly (once after each
command) to get the start/end, yes.  But not the completion-table.

        Stefan