GNU bug report logs -
#11876
guile-2.0.6 on debian squeeze 32 bit - 2 of 28 tests failed
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 11876 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 11876 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#11876; Package
guile.
(Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org.
(Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
wget ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guile/guile-2.0.6.tar.gz
tar -xvf guile-2.0.6.tar.gz
cd guile-2.0.6
BDW_GC_CFLAGS=-L/usr/lib BDW_GC_LIBS=-lgc ./configure
BDW_GC_CFLAGS=-L/usr/lib BDW_GC_LIBS=-lgc make
BDW_GC_CFLAGS=-L/usr/lib BDW_GC_LIBS=-lgc make check
FAIL: test-scm-spawn-thread
/bin/bash: line 5: 2329 Segmentation fault srcdir="."
builddir="." CHARSETALIASDIR="/home/vonbecmann/downloads/guile/guile-2.0.6/lib"
GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 "../../meta/uninstalled-env" ${dir}$tst
FAIL: test-pthread-create
SKIP: test-pthread-create-secondary
==================================
2 of 28 tests failed
(1 test was not run)
Please report to bug-guile <at> gnu.org
==================================
--
Bernardo E.C.
[check-guile.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#11876; Package
guile.
(Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:06:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 11876 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Bernardo,
Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> FAIL: test-scm-spawn-thread
> /bin/bash: line 5: 2329 Segmentation fault srcdir="."
> builddir="." CHARSETALIASDIR="/home/vonbecmann/downloads/guile/guile-2.0.6/lib"
> GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 "../../meta/uninstalled-env" ${dir}$tst
> FAIL: test-pthread-create
What version of libgc do you use? It seems likely to be due to an old
version, which used to have thread-related bugs.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#11876; Package
guile.
(Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 11876 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Ludo,
here's the output
$ dpkg -l libgc-dev
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii libgc-dev 1:6.8-1.2 conservative garbage collector for C (develo
thanks
On 7/9/12, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi Bernardo,
>
> Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> FAIL: test-scm-spawn-thread
>> /bin/bash: line 5: 2329 Segmentation fault srcdir="."
>> builddir="."
>> CHARSETALIASDIR="/home/vonbecmann/downloads/guile/guile-2.0.6/lib"
>> GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 "../../meta/uninstalled-env" ${dir}$tst
>> FAIL: test-pthread-create
>
> What version of libgc do you use? It seems likely to be due to an old
> version, which used to have thread-related bugs.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
--
Bernardo E.C.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#11876; Package
guile.
(Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 11876 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> ii libgc-dev 1:6.8-1.2 conservative garbage collector for C (develo
As README says, Guile requires libgc 7.x, and preferably the latest one.
It can be obtained from
<http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/gc_source/>.
Can you try and report back?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#11876; Package
guile.
(Tue, 17 Jul 2012 03:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 11876 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Sorry for the delay,
after installing
http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/gc_source/gc-7.3alpha2.tar.gz
and
http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/atomic_ops/download/libatomic_ops-7.3alpha2.tar.gz
I got
FAIL: check-guile
==================================
1 of 1 test failed
Please report to bug-guile <at> gnu.org
==================================
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > ii libgc-dev 1:6.8-1.2 conservative garbage collector for C (develo
>
> As README says, Guile requires libgc 7.x, and preferably the latest one.
> It can be obtained from
> <http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/gc_source/>.
>
> Can you try and report back?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
--
Bernardo E.C.
[check-guile.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#11876; Package
guile.
(Thu, 26 Jul 2012 01:55:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 11876 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 7/17/12, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann <at> gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry for the delay,
after installing
http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/gc_source/gc-7.3alpha2.tar.gz
and
http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/atomic_ops/download/libatomic_ops-7.3alpha2.tar.gz
I got
FAIL: check-guile
==================================
1 of 1 test failed
Please report to bug-guile <at> gnu.org
==================================
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>> > ii libgc-dev 1:6.8-1.2 conservative garbage collector for C
>> > (develo
>>
>> As README says, Guile requires libgc 7.x, and preferably the latest one.
>> It can be obtained from
>> <http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/gc_source/>.
>>
>> Can you try and report back?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo’.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Bernardo E.C.
>
--
Bernardo E.C.
[guile-log.tar.gz (application/x-gzip, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#11876; Package
guile.
(Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:49:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 11876 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi again,
The log you sent shows two failures:
FAIL: ftw.test: file-system-fold: EACCES
FAIL: gc.test: gc: Lexical vars are collectable
The second one is harmless and can be ignored.
As for the first one, can you try this patch, run ‘./check-guile
ftw.test’, and send the output?
[Message part 2 (text/x-patch, inline)]
diff --git a/test-suite/tests/ftw.test b/test-suite/tests/ftw.test
index 33537d0..227eb73 100644
--- a/test-suite/tests/ftw.test
+++ b/test-suite/tests/ftw.test
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@
(skip (lambda (n s r) (cons `(skip ,n) r)))
(error (lambda (n s e r) (cons `(error ,n ,e) r)))
(name (string-append %top-builddir "/test-EACCES")))
- (equal? (file-system-fold enter? leaf down up skip error '() name)
+ (equal? (pk (file-system-fold enter? leaf down up skip error '() name))
`((error ,name ,EACCES))))))
(pass-if "dangling symlink and lstat"
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Also, please indicate what kernel and libc version are being used.
Thanks in advance,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#11876; Package
guile.
(Mon, 03 Sep 2012 22:50:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 11876 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludo
See below
* kernel version
$ uname -a
Linux debian-vm 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Wed Jan 11 12:29:30 UTC 2012 i686 GNU/Linux
* ftw output
BDW_GC_CFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib BDW_GC_LIBS=-lgc ./check-guile ftw.test
BDW_GC_CFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib BDW_GC_LIBS=-lgc ./check-guile ftw.test
> ftw-output.log
* libc version
$ dpkg -l libc6*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii libc6 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libc6-dev 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Development Librarie
un libc6-dev-i386 <none> (no description available)
un libc6-i686 <none> (no description available)
un libc6.1 <none> (no description available)
un libc6.1-dev <none> (no description available)
Thanks
On 9/3/12, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> The log you sent shows two failures:
>
> FAIL: ftw.test: file-system-fold: EACCES
> FAIL: gc.test: gc: Lexical vars are collectable
>
> The second one is harmless and can be ignored.
>
> As for the first one, can you try this patch, run ‘./check-guile
> ftw.test’, and send the output?
>
>
--
Bernardo E.C.
[ftw-output.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
[check-guile.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#11876; Package
guile.
(Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:45:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 11876 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> Running ftw.test
>
> ;;; (((error "/home/vonbecmann/downloads/guile/guile-2.0.6/test-EACCES" 13)))
>
> Totals for this test run:
> passes: 30
> failures: 0
Well, here the test succeeds (EACCES is 13). Can you make it fail
again? :-)
Could it be that you upgraded your libc or kernel in the meantime?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#11876; Package
guile.
(Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:17:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #32 received at 11876 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludo,
I'm sorry but i couldn't reproduce this bug. and at the moment i have no
idea what happened.
anyway you can close this bug. IFRC, the original problem was the gcc
version; that is working now.
i might try this in another occasion.
thanks
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > Running ftw.test
> >
> > ;;; (((error "/home/vonbecmann/downloads/guile/guile-2.0.6/test-EACCES"
> 13)))
> >
> > Totals for this test run:
> > passes: 30
> > failures: 0
>
> Well, here the test succeeds (EACCES is 13). Can you make it fail
> again? :-)
>
> Could it be that you upgraded your libc or kernel in the meantime?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
--
Bernardo E.C.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Reply sent
to
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès):
You have taken responsibility.
(Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:13:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:13:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #37 received at 11876-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> I'm sorry but i couldn't reproduce this bug. and at the moment i have no
> idea what happened.
> anyway you can close this bug. IFRC, the original problem was the gcc
> version; that is working now.
Thanks. Feel free to reopen a bug if that happens again, of course.
Ludo’.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 331 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.