GNU bug report logs - #11862
[PATCH 0/9] doc/lispref/intro.texi: Copyediting

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Michael Witten <mfwitten <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 20:23:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: patch

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #95 received at 11862 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Wolfgang Jenkner <wjenkner <at> inode.at>
To: Michael Witten <mfwitten <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 11862 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>,
	Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: Re: bug#11862: [PATCH 8/9 v3] doc/lispref/intro.texi: More precise
	language for what a variable is
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:55:55 +0200

On Fri, Jul 06 2012, Michael Witten wrote:

> +(@pxref{Symbols}); binding is frequently referred to as @dfn{setting},

This is a bit misleading, except when speaking of previously unbound
symbols or when using "is set" as a stative perfect.  Could you please
give an example where binding a bound symbol is described as "setting"
it?  IMHO, this would be a documentation bug.

Wolfgang
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 316 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.