Subject: bug#11862: [PATCH 4/9] doc/lispref/intro.texi: More precise language

From: Richard Stallman <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 06:13:58 -0400

Any argument whose name contains the name of a type (e.g.,
    -@var{integer}, @var{integer1} or @var{buffer}) is expected to be of that
    +@var{integer}, @var{integer1} or @var{buffer}) is expected to be
    +bound to an object of that
     type.

We normally use "argument" to refer to the value, not the name.
Thus, it is correct as written now.  Please don't make it more pedantic.

--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org  www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
  Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call