GNU bug report logs - #11858
df -m undocumented, why no df -g

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Andreas Jaeger <aj <at> suse.com>

Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 18:43:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #26 received at 11858 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: Bernhard Voelker <mail <at> bernhard-voelker.de>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj <at> suse.com>, 11858 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
	Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:08:47 +0200
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 07/05/2012 02:35 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> However, I'm tempted to remove it directly this time, since it's been
>> undocumented for a while:
>>
>>   5 years in df.1 and df --help: COREUTILS-6_9-151-g1e07a21
>>   11 years in coreutils.texi: FILEUTILS-4_1_4-28-gf5bf6fe
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I agree, the option has been added to df in 1996, and declared
> obsolescent in 2001, so the period since the latter is twice as
> long as the active use.
>
> And it's very easy to s/--megabytes/-BM/ ...

More important than 2001 is the year in which we removed
the reference from the man page and from --help: 2007




This bug report was last modified 13 years and 12 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.