From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 25 03:05:19 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2012 07:05:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56008 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj3MI-00089W-UE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:05:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47322) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Siy5m-0000cC-Cr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:27:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Siy1y-0004qv-Dv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:23:57 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:38324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Siy1y-0004qo-8B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:23:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52987) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Siy1u-0008M1-9f for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:23:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Siy1m-0004pA-7Q for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:23:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:47085) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Siy1l-0004oa-PW; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:23:42 -0400 Received: by wibhq4 with SMTP id hq4so1805049wib.12 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:23:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :content-type; bh=wpSd0IoO3x4Qx/iheuj4g9F6PLGWYIItsXWWvtO8tPU=; b=v5lmrfIa1hPs+YlXWksE+oyXKo+8x8VlJ/1eEcl15lBO58ZFMvpLLcVPjMpFppz6kG 3MSaL3YGwZ+5+OfZ8I1MREzL269SD/a40cfzeKKi+f6pt6xxDPY5ob1eI8FzIq5Z/h3/ cDxYZTioUoYKNRW/waJ0u+mdiKl39VV0IsScnQ8umLpCXRSZFjpoEt0aJlLOPL0zpGhU jhDM//amortBhZnwHicVCBpJNmptDoEIIwd4mV8EGKNI3xQs4jQokhthA9iV5LRLIQCO LaPsyimz21Uv/he6faaFmdHq7NNizqSheTlAEZscPGQkiscPThL8lirIclryT+zCGono aSdA== Received: by 10.180.87.35 with SMTP id u3mr16511895wiz.2.1340587418199; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (tal33-3-82-233-82-24.fbx.proxad.net. [82.233.82.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z8sm28298622wiy.1.2012.06.24.18.23.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FE7BD78.3010905@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:23:04 +0200 From: Cyril Roelandt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120510 Icedove/10.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bug-guile@gnu.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org Subject: Guile Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080406010204010807000706" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:05:12 -0400 Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080406010204010807000706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (I'm sending this to both bug-guile and bug-hurd; could you please keep debian-hurd CC'ed ?) Hi ! I'm trying to run Guile 2.0.5 on Debian GNU/Hurd in a qemu virtual machine. I installed Guile from the tarball, with no configure options at all. I'm getting the following error: $ ./meta/guile GNU Guile 2.0.5 Copyright (C) 1995-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'. This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details. Enter `,help' for help. scheme@(guile-user)> (+ 1 2) Illegal instruction The GDB output is attached. When compiling with --without-threads, I can run (+ 1 2) in the interpreter successfully. Running ./check-guile gives me the following result: Totals for this test run: passes: 34286 failures: 2 unexpected passes: 0 expected failures: 30 unresolved test cases: 575 untested test cases: 1 unsupported test cases: 15 errors: 0 So I think it's probably usable this way. WBR, Cyril Roelandt. --------------080406010204010807000706 Content-Type: text/plain; name="guile-sigill" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="guile-sigill" $ ./meta/gdb-uninstalled-guile GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4-debian Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i486-gnu". For bug reporting instructions, please see: ... Reading symbols from /home/cyril/GUILE/guile-2.0.5/libguile/.libs/lt-guile...done. (gdb) r Starting program: /home/cyril/GUILE/guile-2.0.5/libguile/.libs/lt-guile [New Thread 29569.5] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x011b51ad in GC_find_limit_with_bound () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 (gdb) c Continuing. GNU Guile 2.0.5 Copyright (C) 1995-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'. This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details. Enter `,help' for help. scheme@(guile-user)> (+ 1 2) [New Thread 29569.6] Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1. 0x013f67cc in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 (gdb) c Continuing. Program received signal SIGUSR2, User defined signal 2. 0x013f67cc in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 (gdb) c Continuing. $1 Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. 0x01413a5c in _hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 (gdb) bt #0 0x01413a5c in _hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #1 0x015bef96 in io_write () from /lib/i386-gnu/libhurduser.so.0.3 #2 0x01418c31 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #3 0x0141eab2 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #4 0x014186d8 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #5 0x014d7802 in write () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #6 0x01121324 in safe_write (fd=fd@entry=1, buf=buf@entry=0x17fece0, count=count@entry=2) at safe-read.c:66 #7 0x011208b8 in full_write (fd=1, buf=buf@entry=0x17fece0, count=count@entry=2) at full-write.c:65 #8 0x01088092 in fport_write (port=0x80f8c08, data=0x17fece0, size=2) at fports.c:772 #9 0x010c1531 in scm_lfwrite (ptr=ptr@entry=0x17fece0 "$1\004\b", size=size@entry=2, port=port@entry=0x80f8c08) at ports.c:1449 #10 0x010c4f17 in display_string_as_utf8 (port=, len=, narrow_p=, str=) at print.c:862 #11 display_string (str=0x83427f8, narrow_p=1, len=len@entry=2, port=port@entry=0x80f8c08, strategy=SCM_FAILED_CONVERSION_QUESTION_MARK) at print.c:990 #12 0x010c6b1d in iprin1 (exp=0x8404490, port=0x80f8c08, pstate=0x82804d8) at print.c:586 #13 0x010c7124 in scm_prin1 (exp=exp@entry=0x8404490, port=port@entry=0x80f8c08, writingp=writingp@entry=0) at print.c:777 #14 0x010c5886 in scm_display (obj=0x8404490, port=port@entry=0x80f8c08) at print.c:1341 #15 0x010c5be9 in print_normal_symbol (port=0x80f8c08, sym=0x84044c0) at print.c:386 #16 scm_i_print_symbol_name (sym=sym@entry=0x84044c0, port=port@entry=0x80f8c08) at print.c:431 #17 0x010c6ec1 in iprin1 (exp=0x84044c0, port=0x80f8c08, pstate=0x8280ac0) at print.c:601 #18 0x010c7124 in scm_prin1 (exp=0x84044c0, port=port@entry=0x80f8c08, writingp=0) at print.c:777 #19 0x010c7466 in scm_simple_format (destination=0x80f8c08, message=0x8253d90, args=0x8407340) at print.c:1425 #20 0x01109b4a in vm_debug_engine (vm=0x80f8c50, program=0x15d2808, argv=0x80fb270, nargs=17592848) at vm-i-system.c:898 #21 0x0111564a in scm_c_vm_run (vm=vm@entry=0x80f8c50, program=program@entry=0x82e0768, argv=argv@entry=0x17ff2a0, nargs=1) at vm.c:567 #22 0x01115739 in scm_call_with_vm (vm=0x80f8c50, proc=proc@entry=0x82e0768, args=, args@entry=0x84073b8) at vm.c:859 #23 0x01079cf2 in scm_apply (proc=proc@entry=0x82e0768, arg1=arg1@entry=0x84073b8, args=0x84073b8, args@entry=0x304) at eval.c:748 #24 0x0107b9bb in scm_apply_0 (proc=0x82e0768, args=args@entry=0x84073b8) at eval.c:582 #25 0x01098bd6 in scm_c_run_hook (hook=hook@entry=0x8196fe0, args=args@entry=0x84073b8) at hooks.c:274 #26 0x01098c44 in scm_run_hook (hook=0x8196fe0, args=0x84073b8) at hooks.c:262 #27 0x01109aa6 in vm_debug_engine (vm=0x80f8c50, program=0x15d2808, argv=0x80fb228, nargs=17402864) at vm-i-system.c:895 #28 0x0111564a in scm_c_vm_run (vm=0x80f8c50, program=program@entry=0x813c150, argv=argv@entry=0x17ff5e0, nargs=nargs@entry=1) at vm.c:567 #29 0x0107bc37 in scm_primitive_eval (exp=exp@entry=0x8208ae0) at eval.c:685 #30 0x0107bcb0 in scm_eval (exp=0x8208ae0, module_or_state=module_or_state@entry=0x81786c0) at eval.c:719 #31 0x010d3333 in scm_shell (argc=1, argv=0x17ffd08) at script.c:441 #32 0x0109c2ac in invoke_main_func (body_data=0x17ffc50) at init.c:336 #33 0x01071470 in c_body (d=0x17ffb94) at continuations.c:512 #34 0x010fc734 in apply_catch_closure (clo=0x81ec670, args=0x304) at throw.c:146 #35 0x011140da in vm_regular_engine (vm=0x80f8c50, program=0x15d2808, argv=0x81ec670, nargs=4) at vm-i-system.c:960 #36 0x0111564a in scm_c_vm_run (vm=0x80f8c50, program=program@entry=0x8143a50, argv=argv@entry=0x17ffaa0, nargs=nargs@entry=4) at vm.c:567 #37 0x0107b634 in scm_call_4 (proc=0x8143a50, arg1=arg1@entry=0x404, arg2=arg2@entry=0x81ec670, arg3=arg3@entry=0x81ec660, arg4=arg4@entry=0x81ec650) at eval.c:507 #38 0x010fcbb6 in scm_catch_with_pre_unwind_handler (key=key@entry=0x404, thunk=thunk@entry=0x81ec670, handler=handler@entry=0x81ec660, pre_unwind_handler=0x81ec650) at throw.c:86 #39 0x010fcd9c in scm_c_catch (tag=tag@entry=0x404, body=body@entry=0x1071460 , body_data=body_data@entry=0x17ffb94, handler=handler@entry=0x10718f0 , handler_data=handler_data@entry=0x17ffb94, pre_unwind_handler=pre_unwind_handler@entry=0x10715b0 , pre_unwind_handler_data=pre_unwind_handler_data@entry=0x80f8be8) at throw.c:213 #40 0x01071d03 in scm_i_with_continuation_barrier (body=body@entry=0x1071460 , body_data=body_data@entry=0x17ffb94, handler=handler@entry=0x10718f0 , handler_data=handler_data@entry=0x17ffb94, pre_unwind_handler=pre_unwind_handler@entry=0x10715b0 , pre_unwind_handler_data=0x80f8be8) at continuations.c:450 #41 0x01071de6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier (func=0x109c270 , data=0x17ffc50) at continuations.c:546 #42 0x010f9fda in with_guile_trampoline (data=0x17ffc24) at threads.c:884 #43 with_gc_active (data=0x17ffc24, func=) at threads.c:255 #44 with_guile_and_parent (base=0x17ffbfc, data=0x17ffc24) at threads.c:930 #45 0x011b421e in GC_call_with_stack_base () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 #46 0x010fa1ff in scm_i_with_guile_and_parent (parent=, data=0x17ffc50, func=0x109c270 ) at threads.c:945 #47 scm_with_guile (func=func@entry=0x109c270 , data=data@entry=0x17ffc50) at threads.c:951 #48 0x0109c435 in scm_boot_guile (argc=argc@entry=1, argv=argv@entry=0x17ffd08, main_func=main_func@entry=0x8048960 , closure=closure@entry=0x0) at init.c:319 #49 0x08048875 in main (argc=1, argv=0x17ffd08) at guile.c:71 --------------080406010204010807000706-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 25 07:24:21 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2012 11:24:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56743 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj7P3-0007O1-NW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:24:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60531) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj7P1-0007Ns-PM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:24:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj72Q-00064p-8d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:01:04 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:43668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj72Q-00064g-5I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:00:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35287) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj72K-0007wk-3y for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:00:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj72G-00062z-4u for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:00:51 -0400 Received: from toccata.ens-lyon.org ([140.77.166.68]:38350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj72F-0005zZ-Jt; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:00:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by toccata.ens-lyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86C484095; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:00:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at toccata.ens-lyon.org Received: from toccata.ens-lyon.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (toccata.ens-lyon.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FC7h35MOQxkv; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:00:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from type.ipv6 (unknown [177.97.121.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by toccata.ens-lyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F36E84093; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:00:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from samy by type.ipv6 with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj71z-0002Ew-NZ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:00:31 +0200 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:00:31 -0300 From: Samuel Thibault To: Cyril Roelandt Subject: Re: Guile Message-ID: <20120625110031.GS4499@type.lan> Mail-Followup-To: Cyril Roelandt , bug-guile@gnu.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org References: <4FE7BD78.3010905@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FE7BD78.3010905@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Cyril Roelandt, le Mon 25 Jun 2012 03:23:04 +0200, a =E9crit : > Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. > 0x01413a5c in _hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 > (gdb) bt Please also post thread apply all bt Samuel From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 25 17:29:12 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2012 21:29:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57731 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjGqO-00065H-Av for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:29:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58212) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjGqM-00065A-Ra for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:29:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjGmV-0000p0-Uj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:25:13 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:43335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjGmV-0000ov-R3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:25:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjGmT-0002ur-Qv for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:25:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjGmR-0000nm-MN for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:25:09 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjGmR-0000mp-Fr for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:25:07 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SjGmM-00010X-UN for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:25:02 +0200 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:25:02 +0200 Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:25:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-guile@gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Subject: Re: Guile Followup-To: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:24:39 +0200 Lines: 34 Message-ID: <87y5nbw0dk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4FE7BD78.3010905@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 8 Messidor an 220 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:xn6Wh4kHt+UamIu+3k6Yg4HOzIk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Hi, Cyril Roelandt skribis: > I'm trying to run Guile 2.0.5 on Debian GNU/Hurd in a qemu virtual machine. > > I installed Guile from the tarball, with no configure options at > all. I'm getting the following error: > > $ ./meta/guile > GNU Guile 2.0.5 > Copyright (C) 1995-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'. > This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it > under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details. > > Enter `,help' for help. > scheme@(guile-user)> (+ 1 2) > Illegal instruction For the record, I can’t reproduce it with the QEMU image at , which contains Guile 2.0.5.178 (from the ‘stable-2.0’ branch), cross-built with thread support. Something like this works fine: (map (compose join-thread (lambda (i) (call-with-new-thread (lambda () i)))) (iota 1000)) Thanks, Ludo’. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 25 21:31:54 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2012 01:31:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjKdF-00033T-G8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:31:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34903) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjKdC-00033M-Oj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:31:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjKZK-0005wg-CL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:27:52 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:60445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjKZK-0005wZ-6T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:27:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjKZH-0004eg-V4 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:27:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjKZF-0005vu-AL for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:27:47 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:33132) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjKZE-0005vo-UG; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:27:45 -0400 Received: by wefh52 with SMTP id h52so3998018wef.0 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:27:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=bRemyXWqpgNovShYn6xlQfHU89vvf6Ay6m8mSW3w42g=; b=0K2WIRi+hqePsHNOPSr3R1HqqV8VYLNbrZUXE3tqiBv+bWx3sb0J3Io3dqlxGb1BhQ hn5XnaJX6Snmq8Y8xEi4L33r2oEDvlOxJtJvkEtuaIsF0ubSBj0iepDUg3ZUVs8r41L0 +Wi6tFnRaQgyAGb971p5d4BE/WXp0+oGm2UN+tnB6gtEuWOSOKqFhD27/tr2StOUoRLh rIxs3j/pdpeHToX3nRVlIShoSZzdHO9c3H+Opd/hKpTOZPKHCCA459S15cz2gkJjuBf4 enVnSNh3pV8HyaJFj964JgYgq8vF6gC7/pm4ndR+pf8pFE1+a6z/OmxTxAhsAKurpr7G 2ERQ== Received: by 10.180.76.135 with SMTP id k7mr28858757wiw.7.1340674061417; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (tal33-3-82-233-82-24.fbx.proxad.net. [82.233.82.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d10sm2326100wiy.3.2012.06.25.18.27.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:27:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FE90FEA.1030007@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 03:27:06 +0200 From: Cyril Roelandt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120510 Icedove/10.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bug-guile@gnu.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Guile References: <4FE7BD78.3010905@gmail.com> <20120625110031.GS4499@type.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120625110031.GS4499@type.lan> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060907090709070306000201" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060907090709070306000201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 06/25/2012 01:00 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Cyril Roelandt, le Mon 25 Jun 2012 03:23:04 +0200, a écrit : >> Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. >> 0x01413a5c in _hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 >> (gdb) bt > > Please also post > > thread apply all bt > I attached the log. Cyril. --------------060907090709070306000201 Content-Type: text/plain; name="gdb-all-threads" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="gdb-all-threads" Thread 6 (Thread 29520.6): #0 0x01412036 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #1 0x015bf1a5 in io_read () from /lib/i386-gnu/libhurduser.so.0.3 #2 0x01418321 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #3 0x0141e880 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #4 0x01417d44 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #5 0x014d75a2 in read () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #6 0x010d21f4 in read_signal_pipe_data (data=data@entry=0x1bff6e4) at scmsigs.c:158 #7 0x010fa2ac in with_gc_inactive (data=0x1bff6e4, func=0x10d21c0 ) at threads.c:249 #8 scm_without_guile (func=func@entry=0x10d21c0 , data=data@entry=0x1bff6e4) at threads.c:964 #9 0x010d2144 in signal_delivery_thread (data=0x0) at scmsigs.c:178 #10 0x010fc734 in apply_catch_closure (clo=0x838eef0, args=0x304) at throw.c:146 #11 0x01109be0 in vm_debug_engine (vm=0x8390fd0, program=0x156f534, argv=0x83920c0, nargs=137948912) at vm-i-system.c:960 #12 0x0111564a in scm_c_vm_run (vm=0x8390fd0, program=program@entry=0x8143a50, argv=argv@entry=0x1bff9a4, nargs=nargs@entry=3) at vm.c:567 #13 0x0107b5cc in scm_call_3 (proc=0x8143a50, arg1=arg1@entry=0x404, arg2=arg2@entry=0x838eef0, arg3=arg3@entry=0x838eee0) at eval.c:500 #14 0x010fcb08 in scm_catch (key=key@entry=0x404, thunk=thunk@entry=0x838eef0, handler=handler@entry=0x838eee0) at throw.c:73 #15 0x010fcc1c in scm_catch_with_pre_unwind_handler (key=key@entry=0x404, thunk=thunk@entry=0x838eef0, handler=handler@entry=0x838eee0, pre_unwind_handler=0x904) at throw.c:81 #16 0x010fcd9c in scm_c_catch (tag=tag@entry=0x404, body=body@entry=0x10d20f0 , body_data=body_data@entry=0x0, handler=handler@entry=0x10fd220 , handler_data=handler_data@entry=0x113aba0, pre_unwind_handler=pre_unwind_handler@entry=0, pre_unwind_handler_data=pre_unwind_handler_data@entry=0x0) at throw.c:213 #17 0x010fcdfb in scm_internal_catch (tag=tag@entry=0x404, body=body@entry=0x10d20f0 , body_data=body_data@entry=0x0, handler=handler@entry=0x10fd220 , handler_data=handler_data@entry=0x113aba0) at throw.c:222 #18 0x010fa79e in really_spawn (d=0x17ff24c) at threads.c:1091 #19 0x01071470 in c_body (d=0x1bffe64) at continuations.c:512 #20 0x010fc734 in apply_catch_closure (clo=0x838efc0, args=0x304) at throw.c:146 #21 0x01109be0 in vm_debug_engine (vm=0x8390fd0, program=0x156f534, argv=0x8392060, nargs=137949120) at vm-i-system.c:960 #22 0x0111564a in scm_c_vm_run (vm=0x8390fd0, program=program@entry=0x8143a50, argv=argv@entry=0x1bffd70, nargs=nargs@entry=4) at vm.c:567 #23 0x0107b634 in scm_call_4 (proc=0x8143a50, arg1=arg1@entry=0x404, arg2=arg2@entry=0x838efc0, arg3=arg3@entry=0x838efb0, arg4=arg4@entry=0x838efa0) at eval.c:507 #24 0x010fcbb6 in scm_catch_with_pre_unwind_handler (key=key@entry=0x404, thunk=thunk@entry=0x838efc0, handler=handler@entry=0x838efb0, pre_unwind_handler=0x838efa0) at throw.c:86 #25 0x010fcd9c in scm_c_catch (tag=tag@entry=0x404, body=body@entry=0x1071460 , body_data=body_data@entry=0x1bffe64, handler=handler@entry=0x10718f0 , handler_data=handler_data@entry=0x1bffe64, pre_unwind_handler=pre_unwind_handler@entry=0x10715b0 , pre_unwind_handler_data=pre_unwind_handler_data@entry=0x80f8be8) at throw.c:213 #26 0x01071d03 in scm_i_with_continuation_barrier (body=body@entry=0x1071460 , body_data=body_data@entry=0x1bffe64, handler=handler@entry=0x10718f0 , handler_data=handler_data@entry=0x1bffe64, pre_unwind_handler=pre_unwind_handler@entry=0x10715b0 , pre_unwind_handler_data=0x80f8be8) at continuations.c:450 #27 0x01071de6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier (func=0x10fa700 , data=0x17ff24c) at continuations.c:546 #28 0x010f9fda in with_guile_trampoline (data=0x1bffef4) at threads.c:884 #29 with_gc_active (data=0x1bffef4, func=) at threads.c:255 #30 with_guile_and_parent (base=0x1bffecc, data=0x1bffef4) at threads.c:930 #31 0x011b421e in GC_call_with_stack_base () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 #32 0x010f95d1 in scm_i_with_guile_and_parent (parent=, data=0x17ff24c, func=0x10fa700 ) at threads.c:945 #33 spawn_thread (d=0x17ff24c) at threads.c:1103 #34 0x011b896b in GC_inner_start_routine () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 #35 0x011b421e in GC_call_with_stack_base () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 #36 0x011b8375 in GC_start_routine () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 #37 0x013d0c80 in entry_point () from /lib/i386-gnu/libpthread.so.0.3 #38 0x00000000 in ?? () Thread 5 (Thread 29520.5): #0 0x013f67cc in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #1 0x013f6fc9 in mach_msg () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #2 0x013f76f9 in mach_msg_server_timeout () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #3 0x013f77cb in mach_msg_server () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #4 0x01407ecf in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #5 0x013d0c80 in entry_point () from /lib/i386-gnu/libpthread.so.0.3 #6 0x00000000 in ?? () Thread 4 (Thread 29520.4): #0 0x01413a5c in _hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #1 0x015bb834 in dir_lookup () from /lib/i386-gnu/libhurduser.so.0.3 #2 0x013fec38 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #3 0x013f90bd in _hurd_ports_use () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #4 0x013fee7d in hurd_file_name_lookup () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #5 0x013ff069 in file_name_lookup () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #6 0x014d44ab in __xstat64 () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 #7 0x010a2827 in stat (__statbuf=0x17ff250, __path=) at /usr/include/i386-gnu/sys/stat.h:457 #8 search_path (path=0x813fcc8, filename=filename@entry=0x84deda0, extensions=0x80f02c0, require_exts=require_exts@entry=0x4, stat_buf=stat_buf@entry=0x17ff250) at load.c:548 #9 0x010a2bee in scm_primitive_load_path (args=0x84ebcd8) at load.c:863 #10 0x01109ab4 in vm_debug_engine (vm=0x80f8c50, program=0x15d2808, argv=0x80fb428, nargs=17443584) at vm-i-system.c:892 #11 0x0111564a in scm_c_vm_run (vm=0x80f8c50, program=program@entry=0x813c150, argv=argv@entry=0x17ff5e0, nargs=nargs@entry=1) at vm.c:567 #12 0x0107bc37 in scm_primitive_eval (exp=exp@entry=0x8208ae0) at eval.c:685 #13 0x0107bcb0 in scm_eval (exp=0x8208ae0, module_or_state=module_or_state@entry=0x81786c0) at eval.c:719 #14 0x010d3333 in scm_shell (argc=1, argv=0x17ffd08) at script.c:441 #15 0x0109c2ac in invoke_main_func (body_data=0x17ffc50) at init.c:336 #16 0x01071470 in c_body (d=0x17ffb94) at continuations.c:512 #17 0x010fc734 in apply_catch_closure (clo=0x81ec670, args=0x304) at throw.c:146 #18 0x011140da in vm_regular_engine (vm=0x80f8c50, program=0x15d2808, argv=0x81ec670, nargs=4) at vm-i-system.c:960 #19 0x0111564a in scm_c_vm_run (vm=0x80f8c50, program=program@entry=0x8143a50, argv=argv@entry=0x17ffaa0, nargs=nargs@entry=4) at vm.c:567 #20 0x0107b634 in scm_call_4 (proc=0x8143a50, arg1=arg1@entry=0x404, arg2=arg2@entry=0x81ec670, arg3=arg3@entry=0x81ec660, arg4=arg4@entry=0x81ec650) at eval.c:507 #21 0x010fcbb6 in scm_catch_with_pre_unwind_handler (key=key@entry=0x404, thunk=thunk@entry=0x81ec670, handler=handler@entry=0x81ec660, pre_unwind_handler=0x81ec650) at throw.c:86 #22 0x010fcd9c in scm_c_catch (tag=tag@entry=0x404, body=body@entry=0x1071460 , body_data=body_data@entry=0x17ffb94, handler=handler@entry=0x10718f0 , handler_data=handler_data@entry=0x17ffb94, pre_unwind_handler=pre_unwind_handler@entry=0x10715b0 , pre_unwind_handler_data=pre_unwind_handler_data@entry=0x80f8be8) at throw.c:213 #23 0x01071d03 in scm_i_with_continuation_barrier (body=body@entry=0x1071460 , body_data=body_data@entry=0x17ffb94, handler=handler@entry=0x10718f0 , handler_data=handler_data@entry=0x17ffb94, pre_unwind_handler=pre_unwind_handler@entry=0x10715b0 , pre_unwind_handler_data=0x80f8be8) at continuations.c:450 #24 0x01071de6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier (func=0x109c270 , data=0x17ffc50) at continuations.c:546 #25 0x010f9fda in with_guile_trampoline (data=0x17ffc24) at threads.c:884 #26 with_gc_active (data=0x17ffc24, func=) at threads.c:255 #27 with_guile_and_parent (base=0x17ffbfc, data=0x17ffc24) at threads.c:930 #28 0x011b421e in GC_call_with_stack_base () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 #29 0x010fa1ff in scm_i_with_guile_and_parent (parent=, data=0x17ffc50, func=0x109c270 ) at threads.c:945 #30 scm_with_guile (func=func@entry=0x109c270 , data=data@entry=0x17ffc50) at threads.c:951 #31 0x0109c435 in scm_boot_guile (argc=argc@entry=1, argv=argv@entry=0x17ffd08, main_func=main_func@entry=0x8048960 , closure=closure@entry=0x0) at init.c:319 #32 0x08048875 in main (argc=1, argv=0x17ffd08) at guile.c:71 --------------060907090709070306000201-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 26 06:31:13 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2012 10:31:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58258 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjT3A-0007Uf-JT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:31:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35935) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjT36-0007UW-Nj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:31:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjSzB-000792-J7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:27:08 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:43304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjSzB-00078q-Fi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:27:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40925) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjSz3-00076R-An for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:27:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjSyx-00075r-MM for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:26:56 -0400 Received: from toccata.ens-lyon.org ([140.77.166.68]:54972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjSyw-000759-Sn; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:26:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by toccata.ens-lyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E193B84098; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:26:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at toccata.ens-lyon.org Received: from toccata.ens-lyon.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (toccata.ens-lyon.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ACY7ZrlKXvNA; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:26:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from type.ipv6 (unknown [177.97.88.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by toccata.ens-lyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 259C184093; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:26:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from samy by type.ipv6 with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1SjSyr-0000K5-JM; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:26:45 +0200 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:26:45 -0300 From: Samuel Thibault To: Cyril Roelandt Subject: Re: Guile Message-ID: <20120626102645.GK3370@type.lan> Mail-Followup-To: Cyril Roelandt , bug-guile@gnu.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org References: <4FE7BD78.3010905@gmail.com> <20120625110031.GS4499@type.lan> <4FE90FEA.1030007@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FE90FEA.1030007@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Cyril Roelandt, le Tue 26 Jun 2012 03:27:06 +0200, a =E9crit : > On 06/25/2012 01:00 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Cyril Roelandt, le Mon 25 Jun 2012 03:23:04 +0200, a =E9crit : > >>Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. > >>0x01413a5c in _hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0= .3 > >>(gdb) bt > > > >Please also post > > > >thread apply all bt > > >=20 > I attached the log. >=20 > Cyril. >=20 > Thread 6 (Thread 29520.6): > #0 0x01412036 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 This is where SIGILL actually happens (this is the firewall function in libc, sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/trampoline.c). Do you have the libc0.3-dbg package installed? it's odd we don't have debugging signals. Anyway, the offset seems to be 0x13da000, thus the functions below. I don't know _hurd_setup_sighandler very much and don't have time to dive in it, but that's most probably where to look at. Just an idea: is guile perhaps using SA_ONSTACK? It's not yet supported, we are still waiting for moving the threadvars into TLS before enabling it. > #1 0x015bf1a5 in io_read () from /lib/i386-gnu/libhurduser.so.0.3 > #2 0x01418321 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 readfd (nested function) > #3 0x0141e880 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 _hurd_ctty_input > #4 0x01417d44 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 _hurd_fd_read > #5 0x014d75a2 in read () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 > #6 0x010d21f4 in read_signal_pipe_data (data=3Ddata@entry=3D0x1bff6e4)= at scmsigs.c:158 > #7 0x010fa2ac in with_gc_inactive (data=3D0x1bff6e4, func=3D0x10d21c0 = ) at threads.c:249 > #8 scm_without_guile (func=3Dfunc@entry=3D0x10d21c0 , data=3Ddata@entry=3D0x1bff6e4) at threads.c:964 > #9 0x010d2144 in signal_delivery_thread (data=3D0x0) at scmsigs.c:178 > #10 0x010fc734 in apply_catch_closure (clo=3D0x838eef0, args=3D0x304) a= t throw.c:146 > #11 0x01109be0 in vm_debug_engine (vm=3D0x8390fd0, program=3D0x156f534,= argv=3D0x83920c0, nargs=3D137948912) at vm-i-system.c:960 > #12 0x0111564a in scm_c_vm_run (vm=3D0x8390fd0, program=3Dprogram@entry= =3D0x8143a50, argv=3Dargv@entry=3D0x1bff9a4,=20 > nargs=3Dnargs@entry=3D3) at vm.c:567 > #13 0x0107b5cc in scm_call_3 (proc=3D0x8143a50, arg1=3Darg1@entry=3D0x4= 04, arg2=3Darg2@entry=3D0x838eef0, arg3=3Darg3@entry=3D0x838eee0) > at eval.c:500 > #14 0x010fcb08 in scm_catch (key=3Dkey@entry=3D0x404, thunk=3Dthunk@ent= ry=3D0x838eef0, handler=3Dhandler@entry=3D0x838eee0) > at throw.c:73 > #15 0x010fcc1c in scm_catch_with_pre_unwind_handler (key=3Dkey@entry=3D= 0x404, thunk=3Dthunk@entry=3D0x838eef0,=20 > handler=3Dhandler@entry=3D0x838eee0, pre_unwind_handler=3D0x904) at= throw.c:81 > #16 0x010fcd9c in scm_c_catch (tag=3Dtag@entry=3D0x404, body=3Dbody@ent= ry=3D0x10d20f0 ,=20 > body_data=3Dbody_data@entry=3D0x0, handler=3Dhandler@entry=3D0x10fd= 220 ,=20 > handler_data=3Dhandler_data@entry=3D0x113aba0, pre_unwind_handler=3D= pre_unwind_handler@entry=3D0,=20 > pre_unwind_handler_data=3Dpre_unwind_handler_data@entry=3D0x0) at t= hrow.c:213 > #17 0x010fcdfb in scm_internal_catch (tag=3Dtag@entry=3D0x404, body=3Db= ody@entry=3D0x10d20f0 ,=20 > body_data=3Dbody_data@entry=3D0x0, handler=3Dhandler@entry=3D0x10fd= 220 ,=20 > handler_data=3Dhandler_data@entry=3D0x113aba0) at throw.c:222 > #18 0x010fa79e in really_spawn (d=3D0x17ff24c) at threads.c:1091 > #19 0x01071470 in c_body (d=3D0x1bffe64) at continuations.c:512 > #20 0x010fc734 in apply_catch_closure (clo=3D0x838efc0, args=3D0x304) a= t throw.c:146 > #21 0x01109be0 in vm_debug_engine (vm=3D0x8390fd0, program=3D0x156f534,= argv=3D0x8392060, nargs=3D137949120) at vm-i-system.c:960 > #22 0x0111564a in scm_c_vm_run (vm=3D0x8390fd0, program=3Dprogram@entry= =3D0x8143a50, argv=3Dargv@entry=3D0x1bffd70,=20 > nargs=3Dnargs@entry=3D4) at vm.c:567 > #23 0x0107b634 in scm_call_4 (proc=3D0x8143a50, arg1=3Darg1@entry=3D0x4= 04, arg2=3Darg2@entry=3D0x838efc0, arg3=3Darg3@entry=3D0x838efb0,=20 > arg4=3Darg4@entry=3D0x838efa0) at eval.c:507 > #24 0x010fcbb6 in scm_catch_with_pre_unwind_handler (key=3Dkey@entry=3D= 0x404, thunk=3Dthunk@entry=3D0x838efc0,=20 > handler=3Dhandler@entry=3D0x838efb0, pre_unwind_handler=3D0x838efa0= ) at throw.c:86 > #25 0x010fcd9c in scm_c_catch (tag=3Dtag@entry=3D0x404, body=3Dbody@ent= ry=3D0x1071460 ,=20 > body_data=3Dbody_data@entry=3D0x1bffe64, handler=3Dhandler@entry=3D= 0x10718f0 ,=20 > handler_data=3Dhandler_data@entry=3D0x1bffe64, pre_unwind_handler=3D= pre_unwind_handler@entry=3D0x10715b0 ,=20 > pre_unwind_handler_data=3Dpre_unwind_handler_data@entry=3D0x80f8be8= ) at throw.c:213 > #26 0x01071d03 in scm_i_with_continuation_barrier (body=3Dbody@entry=3D= 0x1071460 , body_data=3Dbody_data@entry=3D0x1bffe64,=20 > handler=3Dhandler@entry=3D0x10718f0 , handler_data=3Dhan= dler_data@entry=3D0x1bffe64,=20 > pre_unwind_handler=3Dpre_unwind_handler@entry=3D0x10715b0 , pre_unwind_handler_data=3D0x80f8be8) > at continuations.c:450 > #27 0x01071de6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier (func=3D0x10fa700 , data=3D0x17ff24c) at continuations.c:546 > #28 0x010f9fda in with_guile_trampoline (data=3D0x1bffef4) at threads.c= :884 > #29 with_gc_active (data=3D0x1bffef4, func=3D) at thread= s.c:255 > #30 with_guile_and_parent (base=3D0x1bffecc, data=3D0x1bffef4) at threa= ds.c:930 > #31 0x011b421e in GC_call_with_stack_base () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 > #32 0x010f95d1 in scm_i_with_guile_and_parent (parent=3D= , data=3D0x17ff24c, func=3D0x10fa700 ) > at threads.c:945 > #33 spawn_thread (d=3D0x17ff24c) at threads.c:1103 > #34 0x011b896b in GC_inner_start_routine () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 > #35 0x011b421e in GC_call_with_stack_base () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 > #36 0x011b8375 in GC_start_routine () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 > #37 0x013d0c80 in entry_point () from /lib/i386-gnu/libpthread.so.0.3 > #38 0x00000000 in ?? () >=20 > Thread 5 (Thread 29520.5): > #0 0x013f67cc in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 > #1 0x013f6fc9 in mach_msg () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 > #2 0x013f76f9 in mach_msg_server_timeout () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so= .0.3 > #3 0x013f77cb in mach_msg_server () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 > #4 0x01407ecf in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 > #5 0x013d0c80 in entry_point () from /lib/i386-gnu/libpthread.so.0.3 > #6 0x00000000 in ?? () >=20 > Thread 4 (Thread 29520.4): > #0 0x01413a5c in _hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so= .0.3 > #1 0x015bb834 in dir_lookup () from /lib/i386-gnu/libhurduser.so.0.3 > #2 0x013fec38 in ?? () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 > #3 0x013f90bd in _hurd_ports_use () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 > #4 0x013fee7d in hurd_file_name_lookup () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0= .3 > #5 0x013ff069 in file_name_lookup () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 > #6 0x014d44ab in __xstat64 () from /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 > #7 0x010a2827 in stat (__statbuf=3D0x17ff250, __path=3D= ) at /usr/include/i386-gnu/sys/stat.h:457 > #8 search_path (path=3D0x813fcc8, filename=3Dfilename@entry=3D0x84deda= 0, extensions=3D0x80f02c0,=20 > require_exts=3Drequire_exts@entry=3D0x4, stat_buf=3Dstat_buf@entry=3D= 0x17ff250) at load.c:548 > #9 0x010a2bee in scm_primitive_load_path (args=3D0x84ebcd8) at load.c:= 863 > #10 0x01109ab4 in vm_debug_engine (vm=3D0x80f8c50, program=3D0x15d2808,= argv=3D0x80fb428, nargs=3D17443584) at vm-i-system.c:892 > #11 0x0111564a in scm_c_vm_run (vm=3D0x80f8c50, program=3Dprogram@entry= =3D0x813c150, argv=3Dargv@entry=3D0x17ff5e0,=20 > nargs=3Dnargs@entry=3D1) at vm.c:567 > #12 0x0107bc37 in scm_primitive_eval (exp=3Dexp@entry=3D0x8208ae0) at e= val.c:685 > #13 0x0107bcb0 in scm_eval (exp=3D0x8208ae0, module_or_state=3Dmodule_o= r_state@entry=3D0x81786c0) at eval.c:719 > #14 0x010d3333 in scm_shell (argc=3D1, argv=3D0x17ffd08) at script.c:44= 1 > #15 0x0109c2ac in invoke_main_func (body_data=3D0x17ffc50) at init.c:33= 6 > #16 0x01071470 in c_body (d=3D0x17ffb94) at continuations.c:512 > #17 0x010fc734 in apply_catch_closure (clo=3D0x81ec670, args=3D0x304) a= t throw.c:146 > #18 0x011140da in vm_regular_engine (vm=3D0x80f8c50, program=3D0x15d280= 8, argv=3D0x81ec670, nargs=3D4) at vm-i-system.c:960 > #19 0x0111564a in scm_c_vm_run (vm=3D0x80f8c50, program=3Dprogram@entry= =3D0x8143a50, argv=3Dargv@entry=3D0x17ffaa0,=20 > nargs=3Dnargs@entry=3D4) at vm.c:567 > #20 0x0107b634 in scm_call_4 (proc=3D0x8143a50, arg1=3Darg1@entry=3D0x4= 04, arg2=3Darg2@entry=3D0x81ec670, arg3=3Darg3@entry=3D0x81ec660,=20 > arg4=3Darg4@entry=3D0x81ec650) at eval.c:507 > #21 0x010fcbb6 in scm_catch_with_pre_unwind_handler (key=3Dkey@entry=3D= 0x404, thunk=3Dthunk@entry=3D0x81ec670,=20 > handler=3Dhandler@entry=3D0x81ec660, pre_unwind_handler=3D0x81ec650= ) at throw.c:86 > #22 0x010fcd9c in scm_c_catch (tag=3Dtag@entry=3D0x404, body=3Dbody@ent= ry=3D0x1071460 ,=20 > body_data=3Dbody_data@entry=3D0x17ffb94, handler=3Dhandler@entry=3D= 0x10718f0 ,=20 > handler_data=3Dhandler_data@entry=3D0x17ffb94, pre_unwind_handler=3D= pre_unwind_handler@entry=3D0x10715b0 ,=20 > pre_unwind_handler_data=3Dpre_unwind_handler_data@entry=3D0x80f8be8= ) at throw.c:213 > #23 0x01071d03 in scm_i_with_continuation_barrier (body=3Dbody@entry=3D= 0x1071460 , body_data=3Dbody_data@entry=3D0x17ffb94,=20 > handler=3Dhandler@entry=3D0x10718f0 , handler_data=3Dhan= dler_data@entry=3D0x17ffb94,=20 > pre_unwind_handler=3Dpre_unwind_handler@entry=3D0x10715b0 , pre_unwind_handler_data=3D0x80f8be8) > at continuations.c:450 > #24 0x01071de6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier (func=3D0x109c270 , data=3D0x17ffc50) at continuations.c:546 > #25 0x010f9fda in with_guile_trampoline (data=3D0x17ffc24) at threads.c= :884 > #26 with_gc_active (data=3D0x17ffc24, func=3D) at thread= s.c:255 > #27 with_guile_and_parent (base=3D0x17ffbfc, data=3D0x17ffc24) at threa= ds.c:930 > #28 0x011b421e in GC_call_with_stack_base () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 > #29 0x010fa1ff in scm_i_with_guile_and_parent (parent=3D= , data=3D0x17ffc50, func=3D0x109c270 ) > at threads.c:945 > #30 scm_with_guile (func=3Dfunc@entry=3D0x109c270 , d= ata=3Ddata@entry=3D0x17ffc50) at threads.c:951 > #31 0x0109c435 in scm_boot_guile (argc=3Dargc@entry=3D1, argv=3Dargv@en= try=3D0x17ffd08,=20 > main_func=3Dmain_func@entry=3D0x8048960 , closure=3Dclo= sure@entry=3D0x0) at init.c:319 > #32 0x08048875 in main (argc=3D1, argv=3D0x17ffd08) at guile.c:71 --=20 Samuel cool, j'ai un rapport a rendre pour le 31 decembre a minuit... -+- #ens-mim - bonne ann=E9e ! -+- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 28 17:24:53 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2012 21:24:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35861 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkMCq-0006Ff-VN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:24:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53703) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkMCo-0006FW-Sy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:24:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkM8h-0007yU-Hm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:20:36 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:41688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkM8h-0007yJ-Ee for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:20:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkM8f-0001mC-Sp for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:20:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkM8e-0007xV-4b for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:20:33 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53826) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkM8d-0007wD-Tq for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:20:32 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SkM8Y-0003fb-OW for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:20:26 +0200 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:20:26 +0200 Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:20:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-guile@gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Subject: Re: Guile Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:20:07 +0200 Lines: 9 Message-ID: <87vcib6smw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4FE7BD78.3010905@gmail.com> <20120625110031.GS4499@type.lan> <4FE90FEA.1030007@gmail.com> <20120626102645.GK3370@type.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 11 Messidor an 220 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jXb2GLvqPFXpKxMIv7Cy3KKbxtA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Samuel Thibault skribis: > I don't know _hurd_setup_sighandler very much and don't have time to > dive in it, but that's most probably where to look at. Just an idea: is > guile perhaps using SA_ONSTACK? Neither Guile nor libgc does, AFAICS. Ludo’. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 14 15:09:24 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2013 19:09:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1URSIm-0007Bg-8U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:09:24 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:41435) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1URSIk-0007BZ-2W for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:09:22 -0400 Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=tines.lan) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1URSEf-0007Gd-9Y; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:05:09 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:05:01 -0400 Message-ID: <87txn92asi.fsf@tines.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: severity 14047 wishlist severity 13644 wishlist severity 13382 wishlist retitle 11083 Guile on Solaris 10 retitle 11776 Guile on GNU/Hurd merge 11776 11783 thanks [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4997] 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: severity 14047 wishlist severity 13644 wishlist severity 13382 wishlist retitle 11083 Guile on Solaris 10 retitle 11776 Guile on GNU/Hurd merge 11776 11783 thanks [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.3244] 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject severity 14047 wishlist severity 13644 wishlist severity 13382 wishlist retitle 11083 Guile on Solaris 10 retitle 11776 Guile on GNU/Hurd merge 11776 11783 thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 01 18:53:46 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2014 22:53:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XZSmH-0003wz-Ny for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 18:53:46 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:44889) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XZSmF-0003wr-ID for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 18:53:44 -0400 Received: from c-24-62-95-23.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.62.95.23] helo=jojen) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XZSm9-0002Aw-Sz; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 18:53:38 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 18:53:36 -0400 Message-ID: <87iok3bdvz.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: retitle 11083 Guile 2.0.5 on Solaris 10 tags 11083 + moreinfo retitle 11776 Guile 2.0.5 on GNU/Hurd tags 11776 + moreinfo tags 15620 + moreinfo tags 16451 + moreinfo tags 17060 + moreinfo thanks [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: retitle 11083 Guile 2.0.5 on Solaris 10 tags 11083 + moreinfo retitle 11776 Guile 2.0.5 on GNU/Hurd tags 11776 + moreinfo tags 15620 + moreinfo tags 16451 + moreinfo tags 17060 + moreinfo thanks [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject retitle 11083 Guile 2.0.5 on Solaris 10 tags 11083 + moreinfo retitle 11776 Guile 2.0.5 on GNU/Hurd tags 11776 + moreinfo tags 15620 + moreinfo tags 16451 + moreinfo tags 17060 + moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 20 15:36:05 2016 Received: (at 11776-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2016 19:36:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48012 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bF4zN-0001EV-Cn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:36:05 -0400 Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:56509 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bF4zL-0001EN-BD for 11776-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:36:03 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B17424A78; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:36:03 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=xx2LQpSj3qyR jAOTa3otXkaT6I0=; b=h0ld3TO3+7vf2lflsJLbC1Y9yE5VPYuZpvpYf4UG1jeJ lkEuVJ80ev/I86ZDia4iJK2/rsAh93VXQ4kQnvEsgdxdYQGUxtS44foWIiOrVFIS aknsNKCZzBRFD9DLk63DK1lsErYMEDMd6bRJ9rHfpBE0Rw99UF6BMAr5brm3OW0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=DSRV3M kPeCukrK1SCyChQoMqjkZKGI2og5H1wg3YEgQWb7nThKy5SyxZQrjRh2DJzAIc8T skO/cfgwQhQ0Ur89pcj2I+IMpjzCAycNyC2vni5YUPS58N/3fcCM65edMZPVxlWW AV8e+s0ZYHYSNs/6zhu7ukdQH04Jw4SimoGv0= Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A4524A77; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:36:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F1E524A75; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:36:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: bug#11784: Guile on GNU/Hurd References: <4FE7BD78.3010905@gmail.com> <87a9zrxfgc.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:35:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87a9zrxfgc.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:13:39 +0200") Message-ID: <87fus78xgl.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 38D91CEE-371E-11E6-9423-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11776-done Cc: Cyril Roelandt , 11776-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) No update in some years; let's archive this one and if you find a new build issue with 2.0.11 or 2.1.3, let's work from there :) Andy On Mon 25 Jun 2012 23:13, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Hi Cyril! > > Cyril Roelandt skribis: > >> When compiling with --without-threads, I can run (+ 1 2) in the >> interpreter successfully. Running ./check-guile gives me the following >> result: >> >> Totals for this test run: >> passes: 34286 >> failures: 2 >> unexpected passes: 0 >> expected failures: 30 >> unresolved test cases: 575 >> untested test cases: 1 >> unsupported test cases: 15 >> errors: 0 > > Can you please post the =E2=80=98check-guile.log=E2=80=99 excerpt corresp= onding to these > two failures? > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:27:00 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator