GNU bug report logs - #11757
24.1.50; vc-git calls `process-file' too many times

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:17:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.1.50

Done: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #62 received at 11757 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: 11757 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#11757: Acknowledgement (24.1.50; vc-git calls `process-file'
	too many times)
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 16:42:28 +0400
On 02.07.2012 13:08, Michael Albinus wrote:
> Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru> writes:
>
>>> Likely, the best option is to call (vc-registered file) after clearing
>>> the file cache. This recomputes the 'vc-backend property as well, what
>>> we want.
>>
>> Have you tried this? (vc-backend file) gets called just a bit later,
>> in `vc-after-save`, and it calls `vc-registered' in turn, but since
>> the file is no longer registered with Git, it returns nil, and the
>> mode-line is not updated.
>
> Well, I've played with it. Scenario:

I believe both scenarios below would work just as well with my original 
patch.

> - Have a git-controlled file on disk
> - Load it in Emacs.
> - Remove it on disk, outside Emacs.
> - Save it from Emacs
>
> In vc-before-save, the file cache is cleared 'cause the file doesn't
> exist any longer. As you said, vc-backend is called afterwards,
> recomputing some of the properties. The file shows the correct modeline,
> "Git:master".

If you just removed it on disk, without committing the change, doing 
(vc-state-refresh) would correctly recompute its status as 'removed even 
without calling (vc-registered).
That's not the status we have a problem with ('unregistered is).

> 2nd scenario:
>
> - Switch to another branch ("git checkout test")
> - Remove the file on disk, outside Emacs.
> - Save it from Emacs
>
> And now the modeline shows "Git:test", as expected.

Was the file absent in the branch test after checkout? If not, this case 
is no different from the first.
Basically, we need a scenario in which `vc-next-action' will need to 
call `vc-git-register' on a file that recently has been considered 
'up-to-date.

>> So from this standpoint, saving and restoring 'vc-backend value around
>> clearing props in `vc-before-save' might indeed be the best solution.
>
> I believe, we even don't need this. The current code DTRT, and clearing
> the properties happens only when the file has been removed.

I believe we can either not call 'vc-git-registered' from `vc-git-state' 
at all (caching 'vc-registered is not needed in this case), or we should 
fix some scenario which benefits from us doing that.

The logic is rather complicated there, so I might easily be missing some 
examples. If so, please tell.

-- Dmitry




This bug report was last modified 12 years and 362 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.