From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 17 06:46:27 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2012 10:46:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45592 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SgCzy-0002gB-MP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 06:46:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:40269) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SgCzu-0002g1-8M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 06:46:24 -0400 Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so6336560obb.3 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 03:43:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:x-debbugs-version:x-debbugs-package:date :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=0QitHmheKO/7bC+vB3J6VJT3PC6ilk1PGHYWVXPiKew=; b=oq71N8jwNmE/zkfdAED5KMc3ayYERV7E90rY10bahRU/kJpemVM+iXr/w0XGf0Rvz6 as5ceyJ1GGxW1yvkLdF2vw560wMD2PtvrqLy0meeC+5rXDcrUeBWY1fhoW1KuIGVM/ye WP6Y9dfF6dZn5kKSpyJ47lhO6E3mpd5hnIq7umhtAixF4vVHSZWmYEpArlDzxDA2HX8D hTLHCenb7yaa6sLv3+UrO60BRquAtmwa4p7xcLi9DmKTmaBhpZOayXx6nG/L7UIueblo CstKNHYBVOW7TrLnte7R2YoY5VGqwGmsjckrh9xKOk5KDgcHkMWE/OoQX5OFa1pNrlxp P60w== Received: by 10.50.157.194 with SMTP id wo2mr5930108igb.72.1339929791651; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 03:43:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vulcan.local (c-98-215-105-167.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.215.105.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bo7sm10615790igb.2.2012.06.17.03.43.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 17 Jun 2012 03:43:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id AECDCEF4A8F7; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 05:43:09 -0500 (CDT) From: John Wiegley To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org (The Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys) Subject: is nnimap.el being too slow? X-Debbugs-Version: 5.130006 X-Debbugs-Package: gnus Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 05:43:09 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) I have a list.emacs.devel group on a local Dovecot server (using mdbox as the backend) which contains 149,420 articles (828 MB worth). Hitting M-g on this group takes almost 60s. Does that sound right? Below are the elp-results. Thanks, John gnus-topic-get-new-news-this-topic 1 54.531315 54.531315 gnus-group-get-new-news-this-group 1 54.531289 54.531289 gnus-activate-group 2 54.529050000 27.264525000 nnimap-request-group 1 54.527728 54.527728 nnimap-update-infos 1 35.473663 35.473663 nnimap-update-info 1 35.473615 35.473615 gnus-set-difference 2 35.44724 17.72362 nnimap-wait-for-response 1 17.306591 17.306591 nnimap-parse-flags 1 1.535944 1.535944 gnus-demon-run-callback 2 0.447165 0.2235825 gnus-save-newsrc-file 1 0.447087 0.447087 nnheader-accept-process-output 599 0.3195609999 0.0005334908 nnimap-flags-to-marks 1 0.211245 0.211245 gnus-topic-prepare-topic 12 0.158238 0.0131864999 gnus-group-list-all-groups 1 0.054768 0.054768 gnus-group-list-groups 1 0.054759 0.054759 gnus-group-prepare-topics 1 0.054183 0.054183 gnus-group-insert-group-line 238 0.050939 0.0002140294 gnus-gnus-to-quick-newsrc-format 1 0.0434 0.0434 gnus-compress-sequence 10 0.026083 0.0026083 gnus-group-highlight-line 238 0.0120589999 5.066...e-05 gnus-group-name-decode 714 0.0111330000 1.559...e-05 gnus-summary-buffer-name 238 0.0086959999 3.653...e-05 gnus-group-decoded-name 238 0.0076650000 3.220...e-05 gnus-group-update-eval-form 238 0.0071720000 3.013...e-05 gnus-group-name-charset 476 0.0033809999 7.102...e-06 gnus-group-timestamp-delta 238 0.0029469999 1.238...e-05 gnus-group-get-parameter 476 0.0028929999 6.077...e-06 gnus-put-text-property-excluding-characters-with-faces 238 0.0019059999 8.008...e-06 gnus-group-update-group 1 0.001829 0.001829 gnus-run-hooks 243 0.0014759999 6.074...e-06 gnus-topic-update-topic-line 3 0.00146 0.0004866666 gnus-delay-send-queue 1 0.001271 0.001271 gnus-put-text-property 491 0.0011860000 2.415...e-06 gnus-find-method-for-group 288 0.0010550000 3.663...e-06 gnus-topic-update-topics-containing-group 1 0.000982 0.000982 nndraft-request-group 1 0.000958 0.000958 gnus-topic-find-groups 15 0.0007529999 5.019...e-05 gnus-group-parameter-value 476 0.0007180000 1.508...e-06 gnus-topic-insert-topic-line 15 0.0007030000 4.686...e-05 gnus-add-text-properties 268 0.0005830000 2.175...e-06 gnus-update-format-specifications 2 0.000504 0.000252 nndraft-possibly-change-group 1 0.000466 0.000466 nndraft-open-server 1 0.000454 0.000454 gnus-dribble-delete-file 1 0.000392 0.000392 gnus-group-insert-group-line-info 1 0.000344 0.000344 nnoo-parent-function 1 0.000342 0.000342 nnmh-request-group 1 0.000292 0.000292 gnus-parse-format 1 0.000257 0.000257 gnus-group-set-mode-line 3 0.0002270000 7.566...e-05 gnus-parse-complex-format 1 0.000224 0.000224 gnus-topic-parent-topic 26 0.000194 7.461...e-06 nnmail-group-pathname 3 0.0001889999 6.3e-05 gnus-complex-form-to-spec 2 0.000177 8.85e-05 gnus-topic-goto-topic 4 0.0001409999 3.524...e-05 gnus-topic-find-topology 17 0.00014 8.235...e-06 gnus-mode-line-buffer-identification 3 0.0001390000 4.633...e-05 gnus-group-prepare-logic 237 0.0001329999 5.611...e-07 gnus-agent-possibly-alter-active 3 0.00013 4.333...e-05 gnus-continuum-version 4 0.000126 3.15e-05 nndraft-articles 1 0.000125 0.000125 gnus-range-length 238 0.0001209999 5.084...e-07 gnus-extent-start-open 250 0.0001189999 4.759...e-07 gnus-group-get-icon 238 0.0001159999 4.873...e-07 gnus-parse-simple-format 3 0.0001119999 3.733...e-05 nnmh-possibly-change-directory 1 0.000103 0.000103 gnus-agent-method-p 4 8.499...e-05 2.124...e-05 gnus-group-goto-group 2 7e-05 3.5e-05 gnus-emacs-version 3 6.8e-05 2.266...e-05 gnus-make-directory 1 6.8e-05 6.8e-05 gnus-topic-goto-next-group 1 6.6e-05 6.6e-05 gnus-group-remove-mark 1 6.5e-05 6.5e-05 gnus-server-opened 2 6e-05 3e-05 gnus-group-set-parameter 4 5.9e-05 1.475e-05 gnus-range-difference 2 5.5e-05 2.75e-05 gnus-request-scan 1 5.4e-05 5.4e-05 gnus-group-position-point 4 5.4e-05 1.35e-05 nnimap-send-command 2 4.700...e-05 2.350...e-05 gnus-group-mark-group 1 4.4e-05 4.4e-05 nnimap-decode-gnus-group 3 3.9e-05 1.3e-05 gnus-prin1-to-string 2 3.8e-05 1.9e-05 gnus-goto-colon 4 3.700...e-05 9.250...e-06 gnus-topic-update-unreads 27 3.7e-05 1.370...e-06 nnimap-server-opened 3 3.4e-05 1.133...e-05 nnimap-request-scan 1 3.1e-05 3.1e-05 gnus-group-next-unread-group 1 3.1e-05 3.1e-05 gnus-parse-active 2 2.8e-05 1.4e-05 nnimap-possibly-change-group 2 2.7e-05 1.35e-05 gnus-set-work-buffer 4 2.600...e-05 6.500...e-06 gnus-get-buffer-create 2 2.5e-05 1.25e-05 nnoo-change-server 2 2.3e-05 1.15e-05 gnus-close-group 1 2.3e-05 2.3e-05 gnus-group-search-forward 1 2.3e-05 2.3e-05 nnheader-init-server-buffer 1 1.9e-05 1.9e-05 gnus-get-unread-articles-in-group 1 1.9e-05 1.9e-05 nnimap-store-info 2 1.8e-05 9e-06 gnus-message 2 1.7e-05 8.5e-06 gnus-request-update-info 1 1.7e-05 1.7e-05 gnus-get-function 2 1.600...e-05 8.000...e-06 gnus-methods-equal-p 13 1.500...e-05 1.153...e-06 nnimap-keepalive 1 1.5e-05 1.5e-05 gnus-group-process-prefix 1 1.5e-05 1.5e-05 nnoo-server-opened 2 1.4e-05 7e-06 nnheader-report 2 1.300...e-05 6.500...e-06 nndraft-server-opened 1 1.2e-05 1.2e-05 gnus-group-topic-p 1 1.2e-05 1.2e-05 gnus-undo-boundary 11 1.2e-05 1.090...e-06 nnheader-insert 1 1e-05 1e-05 nnmh-server-opened 1 1e-05 1e-05 nnimap-find-connection 3 9e-06 3e-06 nnoo-backend 1 9e-06 9e-06 gnus-methods-sloppily-equal 11 9e-06 8.181...e-07 nnheader-replace-duplicate-chars-in-string 3 8e-06 2.666...e-06 gnus-online 6 8e-06 1.333...e-06 gnus-group-remove-parameter 4 8e-06 2e-06 gnus-group-group-name 3 8e-06 2.666...e-06 gnus-group-topic-unread 8 8e-06 1e-06 gnus-group-setup-buffer 1 7e-06 7e-06 gnus-virtual-group-p 1 6e-06 6e-06 nnoo-current-server 6 5.999...e-06 1e-06 nnimap-buffer 1 5e-06 5e-06 gnus-agent-save-group-info 1 5e-06 5e-06 gnus-group-topic-name 1 5e-06 5e-06 gnus-group-group-indentation 2 4.999...e-06 2.499...e-06 nnoo-parents 4 4e-06 1e-06 gnus-info-set-entry 5 4e-06 8e-07 gnus-alive-p 1 4e-06 4e-06 gnus-group-topic-level 3 4e-06 1.333...e-06 gnus-topic-visible-p 3 4e-06 1.333...e-06 nnheader-re-read-dir 2 3e-06 1.5e-06 nnheader-concat 1 3e-06 3e-06 nnimap-log-command 2 2e-06 1e-06 nnoo-variables 2 2e-06 1e-06 gnus-remove-denial 1 2e-06 2e-06 gnus-agent-save-local 1 2e-06 2e-06 gnus-mouse-face-function 1 2e-06 2e-06 nnheader-translate-file-chars 3 1e-06 3.333...e-07 nnheader-cancel-timer 1 1e-06 1e-06 nnimap-close-group 1 1e-06 1e-06 gnus-group-default-level 1 1e-06 1e-06 gnus-dribble-file-name 1 1e-06 1e-06 gnus-float-time 1 1e-06 1e-06 gnus-region-active-p 1 1e-06 1e-06 gnus-server-status 2 1e-06 5e-07 gnus-demon-idle-since 1 1e-06 1e-06 nnimap-find-process-buffer 1 0.0 0.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 20 14:04:13 2012 Received: (at 11727) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2012 18:04:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50164 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShPGF-0004XU-2G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:04:13 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:43042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShPGB-0004XL-4U for 11727@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:04:08 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShPCf-0007tY-QS; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:00:29 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: John Wiegley Subject: Re: bug#11727: is nnimap.el being too slow? References: Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVoaWi7u7lOT04pJyeF hYT39/cF+hMeAAACcElEQVQ4jU2TzXbjIAyFZUL2kMAeC7LPmM4ePPI+tNb7v8oI7LQlwSfxh65+ AT5X64/dv/8yyF7zzNxf1XL9Df7FnP90g08q+hfYn/d1yt2gWCj+B9zzhab8VxxoN4XrD8iilPPC bKqp8K0FLVfnyr/MTH7dCN5a8PlETJeYtza14i28teArkfkgulzbtnvfiL7BgjEi5kfzTmTsWwu+ 8rEekl8vQKgnuJ/gyvsA+AbWBkiQyPMtVWtfwfgT8ESb3aSI5G9Shwln/wPcxnaf2VZuTqXTwlcn oHmz4uSwBiVnDx9srWfHgBgUrgC0nWBI2j0kvN4SKtB0AutbZf9SxblWqa56HO3AWilQQZdw282G 9At4bnpdZzW/ppbJ8y+w+1tO6fFKKkseEhfUQdiwifNkC8b8FPvmDwvL4B0mR1qAmn2zb+AW3wAD hWSCKrpZfoNsvVG6KH3JgCLvgQ4SZRiUQlB5USFoa4Gq7f7vng0QgTQTY6gdiE7vw+YdrEEnFT+K PkH3wQ/rwG4mxCwx0AAjE2m4C4XK8AEDkBvANQu4BHpiFuBcB7WHd5NEFIZdxQVROy1A4nJky8Zm qtJDeY9BpKQvlRyxm/mlrZLRw0XJ2QPIYFrNu7QWg0w+9AShUF/slDRLkpZ4l5BIAAkpha1cppd2 CuMSn0ETyJYlV9HI0Gkpl2QYMVGvtaDC7CZpm8yQ+Ig5aPklaiDD3w7QnWeJoYMAGrYOGpQu1a9k BwFkpWFRxOQyAHYLESswRkNaUkoHcYFeACWfcSlfQRc6tAaQfQx/q4X00MogEYy1jFthjdbrCRZp c/+O4WdDpAf4D+Rr0XoeMkbcAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Oneohtrix Point Never's _Replica_: "Power of Persuasion" Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:00:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Sun, 17 Jun 2012 05:43:09 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1ShPCf-0007tY-QS X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1340820029.90257@hsuH3l62QlsRTRfQoLvxQw X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11727 Cc: 11727@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) John Wiegley writes: > I have a list.emacs.devel group on a local Dovecot server (using mdbox as the > backend) which contains 149,420 articles (828 MB worth). > > Hitting M-g on this group takes almost 60s. Does that sound right? I have a group with 136560 messages, and hitting `M-g' on it takes about 10s -- virtually all of it spent waiting for data from the IMAP server. It's 5MB for me, though, so 826MB sounds like... a lot more. :-) Is that 828 MB in the " *nnimap ... nntpd*" buffer? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 25 20:24:31 2012 Received: (at 11727) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2012 00:24:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57909 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjJZz-0001XZ-N3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:24:31 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.213.172]:60940) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjJZs-0001XO-Ok for 11727@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:24:26 -0400 Received: by yenq13 with SMTP id q13so3362703yen.3 for <11727@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:20:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=PvoM7XSIiTuCFvBEeehXDatncrl6iH65i09JkN3XXu0=; b=GwQMNfMCvAyApftD6+Wz5wOb3gHoTXfucO67HhA6C9VupTdMYT1zSEgagnTobbMgie dpCvq8PY/owhrNBFcvJIbHd8xOBFlptmErFi1KjL4+fls+6Y5Oz/mUbtB/gDWMjXgi5Y ZiqFeQ/ASXQsuhmPspT+zBhtgd6i+Pk2eUvly6jzKXBbRF+7NKsaGbE2vJU6pcBWHcfb V9xcSdX4cWckzx2ooFFXaGLQi+R8sv1+iI61ZRWzFnVXZu/JkccMBBYpuVG1WRa4G9+l yxXa5kA5zYUNxZWFTlUYAfAcFYSyVpIxt7ygBvfdkFsj4/Lb3xXvIuhRTIPv5fWtDfL8 ehyw== Received: by 10.50.41.165 with SMTP id g5mr9760005igl.13.1340670020305; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vulcan.local (c-98-215-105-167.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.215.105.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y5sm905721igb.11.2012.06.25.17.20.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:20:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 43C6EF0C6F11; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:20:18 -0500 (CDT) From: John Wiegley To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#11727: is nnimap.el being too slow? References: Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:20:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:00:29 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11727 Cc: 11727@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > I have a group with 136560 messages, and hitting `M-g' on it takes about 10s > -- virtually all of it spent waiting for data from the IMAP server. It's > 5MB for me, though, so 826MB sounds like... a lot more. :-) > > Is that 828 MB in the " *nnimap ... nntpd*" buffer? No, that buffer is only 6.2MB. The 828 MB figure is the total size of the messages in Dovecot. John From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 05 14:41:57 2012 Received: (at 11727) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2012 18:41:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9KY0-0004DJ-RP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:41:57 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:48214) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9KXz-0004DC-1g for 11727@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:41:55 -0400 Received: from ip-200-13-149-91.dialup.ice.net ([91.149.13.200] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9KXj-0002cb-LY; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 20:41:40 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: John Wiegley Subject: Re: bug#11727: is nnimap.el being too slow? References: X-Now-Playing: Isotope 217's _The Unstable Molecule_ Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 20:41:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:20:18 -0500") Message-ID: <87627ss467.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1T9KXj-0002cb-LY X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1347475301.28869@B/a47hXm8xjmN99cb6Gz9w X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11727 Cc: 11727@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) John Wiegley writes: >> I have a group with 136560 messages, and hitting `M-g' on it takes about 10s >> -- virtually all of it spent waiting for data from the IMAP server. It's >> 5MB for me, though, so 826MB sounds like... a lot more. :-) >> >> Is that 828 MB in the " *nnimap ... nntpd*" buffer? > > No, that buffer is only 6.2MB. The 828 MB figure is the total size of the > messages in Dovecot. So I guess this is just the time it takes your IMAP server or Emacs to send/read the data? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 25 12:14:23 2012 Received: (at 11727) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2012 17:14:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59473 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnY55-0000qh-0o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 12:14:23 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:48588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnY4y-0000qK-5I for 11727@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 12:14:16 -0500 Received: from ip-90-20-179-93.dialup.ice.net ([93.179.20.90] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnY4A-0004yF-MZ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:13:23 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: John Wiegley Subject: Re: bug#11727: is nnimap.el being too slow? References: <87627ss467.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Winston Tong's _Theoretically Chinese_ Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:13:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87627ss467.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 05 Sep 2012 20:41:36 +0200") Message-ID: <87r4me3vio.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1TnY4A-0004yF-MZ X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357060404.04856@ZKdWjgRcLbJCapg4aZ/Uxg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11727 Cc: 11727@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> No, that buffer is only 6.2MB. The 828 MB figure is the total size of the >> messages in Dovecot. > > So I guess this is just the time it takes your IMAP server or Emacs to > send/read the data? More information was requested, but no response was given within a few months, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please reopen this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 25 12:14:16 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2012 17:14:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnY51-0000qT-G5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 12:14:15 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:48593) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnY4z-0000qM-Qw for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 12:14:14 -0500 Received: from ip-90-20-179-93.dialup.ice.net ([93.179.20.90] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnY4I-0004yh-DX for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:13:30 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:13:28 +0100 Message-Id: <87pq1y3vif.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #11727 X-MailScanner-ID: 1TnY4I-0004yh-DX X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357060411.081@GRPeR6ZOwLhmuYOEZFVO2g X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) close 11727 From unknown Sat Jun 14 03:51:18 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator