From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 14 07:20:21 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2012 11:20:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41946 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sf869-0006x0-5s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:20:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60930) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sf866-0006wr-4t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:20:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sf83H-0001UF-Lk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:17:24 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:53969) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sf83H-0001TH-Ip for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:17:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sf83B-0006ka-Eb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:17:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sf835-0001KR-1O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:17:16 -0400 Received: from msa105.auone-net.jp ([61.117.18.165]:42210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sf834-0001BZ-L9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:17:10 -0400 Received: from GUNGNIR.med.osaka-cu.ac.jp (g1-27-253-251-8.bmobile.ne.jp [27.253.251.8]) by msa105.auone-net.jp (au one net msa) with ESMTP id 0E2E52C803A; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:16:55 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:16:42 +0900 From: Kazuhiro Ito To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.1.50 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7601) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) When I 'make recompile' on Windows, Emacs outputs many "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'" message. The cause of the problem is that lisp/makefile.w32-in does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS variable when recompile. On the other hand, lisp/Makefile.in use it. Please see the below patch. === modified file 'lisp/makefile.w32-in' --- lisp/makefile.w32-in 2012-06-09 11:53:31 +0000 +++ lisp/makefile.w32-in 2012-06-14 00:18:51 +0000 @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ # WARNING: Do NOT split the part inside $(ARGQUOTE)s into multiple lines as # this can break with GNU Make 3.81 and later if sh.exe is used. recompile: compile-first autoloads doit $(lisp)/progmodes/cc-mode.elc - $(emacs) --eval $(ARGQUOTE)(batch-byte-recompile-directory 0)$(ARGQUOTE) $(lisp) + $(emacs) $(BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS) --eval $(ARGQUOTE)(batch-byte-recompile-directory 0)$(ARGQUOTE) $(lisp) $(lisp)/calendar/cal-loaddefs.el: "$(EMACS)" $(EMACSOPT) -l autoload \ -- Kazuhiro Ito From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 14 12:30:08 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2012 16:30:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42539 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SfCvw-0007hc-3K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:30:08 -0400 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:54720) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SfCvt-0007hU-If for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:30:07 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M5M008008CVQA00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:27:10 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M5M0083J8D9PC40@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:27:10 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:27:26 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows In-reply-to: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Kazuhiro Ito Message-id: <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:16:42 +0900 > From: Kazuhiro Ito > > When I 'make recompile' on Windows, Emacs outputs many "Lisp nesting > exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'" message. > > The cause of the problem is that lisp/makefile.w32-in does not use > BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS variable when recompile. On the other hand, > lisp/Makefile.in use it. lisp/makefile.w32-in doesn't use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS because they are not supposed to be needed for that target. Are you using "make recompile" with emacs.exe that has only source (*.el) version of the byte compiler loaded? Otherwise, I don't understand how come you get these errors. I don't want to blindly enlarge the stack of the byte compiler without understanding the problem which causes the errors. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 15 12:44:37 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2012 16:44:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44193 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SfZdV-0000U1-Hq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:44:37 -0400 Received: from msa104.auone-net.jp ([61.117.18.164]:45277) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SfZdR-0000Tq-6G for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:44:35 -0400 Received: from GUNGNIR.med.osaka-cu.ac.jp (180-144-169-144f1.nar1.eonet.ne.jp [180.144.169.144]) by msa104.auone-net.jp (au one net msa) with ESMTP id 1F1FE2C037; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:41:30 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:41:25 +0900 From: Kazuhiro Ito To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows In-Reply-To: <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.1.50 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7601) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > > When I 'make recompile' on Windows, Emacs outputs many "Lisp nesting > > exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'" message. > > lisp/makefile.w32-in doesn't use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS because they are > not supposed to be needed for that target. > > Are you using "make recompile" with emacs.exe that has only source > (*.el) version of the byte compiler loaded? Otherwise, I don't > understand how come you get these errors. Probablely yes. The problem occured when I accidentally stopped 'make bootstrap' in byte-compiling process and then run 'make recompile'. Because I noticed the below ChangeLog entry and I didn't know about the reason of the difference between Makefile.in and makefile.w32-in, I simply thought lisp/makefile.w32-in didn't use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS unintendedly. lisp/ChangeLog > 2011-04-01 Stefan Monnier > > Add lexical binding. (snip) > * Makefile.in (BIG_STACK_DEPTH, BIG_STACK_OPTS, BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS): > New variables. > (compile-onefile, .el.elc, compile-calc, recompile): Use them. > (COMPILE_FIRST): Add macroexp and cconv. > * makefile.w32-in: Mirror changes in Makefile.in. Here is the more strict recipe for the problem. But I don't know whether 'make recompile' is expected to be run in such condition. 1. 'make bootstrap' 2. rm ../lisp/emacs-lisp/macroexp.elc 3. touch ../lisp/image-dired.el 4. make recompile The below error occurs. > Compiling f:/build/emacs-trunk/lisp/image-dired.el... > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > > In toplevel form: > image-dired.el:2352:1:Error: Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth' 5. make recompile Successfully finished. -- Kazuhiro Ito From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 15 13:44:13 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2012 17:44:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44211 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SfaZB-0001my-7E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:44:13 -0400 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:60048) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SfaZ8-0001mm-51 for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:44:11 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M5O00F0063N8E00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:41:08 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M5O00FAJ6GJ1F70@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:41:08 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:41:09 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows In-reply-to: <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Kazuhiro Ito Message-id: <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:41:25 +0900 > From: Kazuhiro Ito > Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > When I 'make recompile' on Windows, Emacs outputs many "Lisp nesting > > > exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'" message. > > > > lisp/makefile.w32-in doesn't use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS because they are > > not supposed to be needed for that target. > > > > Are you using "make recompile" with emacs.exe that has only source > > (*.el) version of the byte compiler loaded? Otherwise, I don't > > understand how come you get these errors. > > Probablely yes. The problem occured when I accidentally stopped 'make > bootstrap' in byte-compiling process and then run 'make recompile'. You should use "make compile" in this situation. "make recompile" might produce incorrect byte code, because it compiles all the files in the same Emacs session. > Here is the more strict recipe for the problem. But I don't know > whether 'make recompile' is expected to be run in such condition. > > 1. 'make bootstrap' > 2. rm ../lisp/emacs-lisp/macroexp.elc > 3. touch ../lisp/image-dired.el > 4. make recompile > > The below error occurs. > > Compiling f:/build/emacs-trunk/lisp/image-dired.el... > > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > > Compiler-macro error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'") > > > > In toplevel form: > > image-dired.el:2352:1:Error: Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth' > > 5. make recompile > Successfully finished. "make compile" should be free from this problem. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 18 09:00:21 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2012 13:00:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46639 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SgbZ6-000277-SI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:00:21 -0400 Received: from msa103.auone-net.jp ([61.117.18.163]:37437) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SgbZ2-00026w-4D for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:00:18 -0400 Received: from GUNGNIR.med.osaka-cu.ac.jp (g1-27-253-251-8.bmobile.ne.jp [27.253.251.8]) by msa103.auone-net.jp (au one net msa) with ESMTP id B5A7F34803A; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:56:54 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:56:44 +0900 From: Kazuhiro Ito To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows In-Reply-To: <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.1.50 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7601) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20120618125654.B5A7F34803A@msa103.auone-net.jp> X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > > The problem occured when I accidentally stopped 'make > > bootstrap' in byte-compiling process and then run 'make recompile'. > > You should use "make compile" in this situation. "make recompile" > might produce incorrect byte code, because it compiles all the files > in the same Emacs session. Thank you for the advice. "make compile" surely has no problem. -- Kazuhiro Ito From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 24 21:14:28 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2012 01:14:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55720 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sixsq-0007wd-4I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:14:28 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53176) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sixso-0007wW-56 for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:14:26 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sixp1-0007L2-OJ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:10:31 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: 9/11 kilo class clones Tony Blair Montenegro SAPO mindwar X-Ran: kK0Z))}3p9tK{|v=Xa31v{0MFA6f:4Rs9qrf<`sMtT[>"&#]QfS/3<~AW}2)mf),t}A9}Z X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:10:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:41:09 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org, Kazuhiro Ito X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Eli Zaretskii wrote: > You should use "make compile" in this situation. "make recompile" > might produce incorrect byte code, because it compiles all the files > in the same Emacs session. I would like to suggest just removing the "recompile" target altogether. Although I have never used it for anything personally, so maybe I'm missing something, but I cannot see why this target should exist. "make compile" is always more correct (and also faster on GNU/Linux for multi-core machines). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 25 07:40:35 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2012 11:40:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56770 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj7eh-0000Gw-1h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:40:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:55037) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj7eb-0000Gg-7W for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:40:29 -0400 Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so6139513pbc.3 for <11707@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:36:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YD3WLOi86iTMH+3CjLRzLHKMW6x4V5Lfo4Edzlj0DZU=; b=mADCgRirhHIVUQVMPxDgEFs0hsu2+FhK4nsZb3r3dmoX8gqULkzre+Qcfi51B/PB/W DvZghdji8dHFs0kTrAgm/fp1R1cq8wQvXjYVDhZecWL8dssF/IpGLBfn8QSZfBELw9Ay jJnu48tYxLF6Dio1CMAMZI/gnAYn0GrI2arAd+r0XRysaadYDXWw1prFxJbtWKCCj3RU PhQvkaugwwNA1tNecqZZH/Cq7A+bPHN95NgodbuTVmDBYVbVJWVP6VUbciRzSIs/xLcy 11FjIPsVcrQQhqPO8I8Vsk+ITtMQso8uSTeFSox/QKbS5jvxdnT8JEIjoLBioBuXhqPF xukw== Received: by 10.68.227.197 with SMTP id sc5mr40895439pbc.58.1340624188457; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:36:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.162.16 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:35:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:35:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Kazuhiro Ito X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > I would like to suggest just removing the "recompile" target altogether. > Although I have never used it for anything personally, You've used it if you ever did "make cvs-update" or "make bzr-update". =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 25 10:39:40 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2012 14:39:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57377 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjAS3-0005Qx-Vi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:39:40 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:21413) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjAS1-0005Qq-OI for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:39:38 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0FAG6Zu0/O+L+Q/2dsb2JhbABEsEiDSYEIghUBAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiBwFugmQRAOeOYR6gViDBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="192051720" Received: from 206-248-191-144.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.191.144]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 25 Jun 2012 10:35:41 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D626358BAA; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:35:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows Message-ID: References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:35:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:10:31 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Kazuhiro Ito X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) >> You should use "make compile" in this situation. "make recompile" >> might produce incorrect byte code, because it compiles all the files >> in the same Emacs session. Actually, I don't know of any case where it ends up generating incorrect byte-code. It will signal different (fewer) warnings and things like that, but AFAIK the generated byte-code should be pretty much equivalent. Moreover, if it ever ends up generating incorrect byte-code, it's most likely because of a bug in some other file (typically, the bug would be that Emacs's behavior is modified just by loading that file). > I would like to suggest just removing the "recompile" target altogether. > Although I have never used it for anything personally, so maybe I'm > missing something, but I cannot see why this target should exist. It is significantly faster on uniprocessor machines. I don't think we should remove it, but we should definitely rename it because nothing in "compile -vs- recompile" hints at the difference. We could rename it to "single-process-compile" or something like that. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 26 12:32:32 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2012 16:32:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58794 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjYgp-0000Ns-UK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:32:32 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42527) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjYgn-0000Nk-GH for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:32:30 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjYcq-0001C0-QJ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:28:25 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Juanma Barranquero Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: enforcers chameleon man ISEC HAMASMOIS Axis of Evil argus X-Ran: [IvrPKhY;-RU2w2VEmN4X0'8]CZ2kf:k=z;hm5b8qQT:l>>fdFor)SU-GtA<06d)^I].DR X-Hue: red X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:28:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:35:47 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Kazuhiro Ito X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Juanma Barranquero wrote: > You've used it if you ever did "make cvs-update" or "make bzr-update". I never have. I don't know why those rules exist either. The cvs-update alias should just be removed now. bzr-update should use compile instead of recompile, since the former is parallelizable, which I think is more useful these days for a majority. But bzr-update seems to offer no advantage over lisp/'s "all" target, so I don't know why it exists at all. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 26 13:12:22 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2012 17:12:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58839 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjZJN-0001J0-VQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:12:22 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:42964) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjZJL-0001Iq-J7 for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:12:21 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M6800400I7BHS00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:07:54 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M68004TRI94AN40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:07:53 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:08:04 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Glenn Morris Message-id: <83wr2u80i3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, kzhr@d1.dion.ne.jp, 11707@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 11707@debbugs.gnu.org, Kazuhiro Ito > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:28:24 -0400 > > But bzr-update seems to offer no advantage over lisp/'s "all" target It does on Windows ;-) Observe: ALL = all: $(ALL) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 28 13:35:15 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2012 17:35:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35527 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIcd-00014e-06 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:35:15 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:55720) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIcb-00014X-I6 for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:35:14 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIYT-0006k2-Pr; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:30:57 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> <83wr2u80i3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: codes Adriatic Albanian assassinate Mossad csim ANC Vince X-Ran: wD.*rJp:xb}Qd10/v5\0Z*zcNkq5%w) (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:08:04 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, kzhr@d1.dion.ne.jp, 11707@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> But bzr-update seems to offer no advantage over lisp/'s "all" target > > It does on Windows ;-) Observe: Prefix everything I say with "on POSIX platforms..." unless otherwise specified. :) So would anyone object to my removing the "bzr-update" rule from lisp/Makefile.in? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 28 13:38:56 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2012 17:38:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35559 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIgC-0001AL-Bv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:38:56 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:55779) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIgA-0001AE-3Z for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:38:54 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIc3-0006vJ-Jd; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:34:39 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: SSL NSA Chobetsu Agfa UMTS beanpole SWAT Ft. Meade X-Ran: +Xrlu!{lW=bu}.fsR(d3;]Wy#/.jKQf%r`#4&U=lg%"!g_whpC=1H!6%hrw7F/Z*B@%"83 X-Hue: magenta X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:34:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:35:40 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Kazuhiro Ito X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Stefan Monnier wrote: > Actually, I don't know of any case where it ends up generating incorrect > byte-code. It will signal different (fewer) warnings and things like > that, but AFAIK the generated byte-code should be pretty much > equivalent. True. Though there's the "invalid byte code" issue with byte-compile-dynamic that was noticed recently. That's an extra, somewhat serious looking warning that it signals. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 28 14:15:38 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2012 18:15:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35604 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJFi-0001yI-8P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:15:38 -0400 Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:34578) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJFh-0001yC-5V for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:15:37 -0400 Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5SIB8N0012256; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:11:08 -0400 Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7243FB4161; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:11:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows Message-ID: References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:11:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:34:39 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4264=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4264> : streams <775694> : uri <1151735> X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Kazuhiro Ito X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) >> Actually, I don't know of any case where it ends up generating incorrect >> byte-code. It will signal different (fewer) warnings and things like >> that, but AFAIK the generated byte-code should be pretty much >> equivalent. > True. Though there's the "invalid byte code" issue with > byte-compile-dynamic that was noticed recently. That's an extra, > somewhat serious looking warning that it signals. Good point. Tho I tend to count it against byte-compile-dynamic, which is a feature I'd be happy to stop supporting. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 28 14:20:08 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2012 18:20:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35609 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJK3-00024l-Qb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:20:08 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:39859) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJK1-00024c-Fv for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:20:06 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M6C00D00AORGL00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:15:35 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M6C00D5RAPZGB10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:15:35 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:15:51 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Glenn Morris Message-id: <834npv8fqg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> <83wr2u80i3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, kzhr@d1.dion.ne.jp, 11707@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 11707@debbugs.gnu.org, kzhr@d1.dion.ne.jp > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:30:57 -0400 > > So would anyone object to my removing the "bzr-update" rule from > lisp/Makefile.in? Instead of removing it, and thus causing pain to finger memory of some of us, how about if bzr-update simply invokes whatever you think should be used instead? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 06 03:49:15 2012 Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jul 2012 07:49:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sn3Hv-00049G-2b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:49:15 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53573) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sn3Ht-00049A-Iw for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:49:14 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sn3D5-0001Sy-4o; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:44:15 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: Centro government Agfa Watergate Abbas FBI mailbomb X-Ran: aDW}!{Qii"aBj~8h=a,)8G<7=5\,a3Pr(a5An6w1e4|iKXvh!34a;.FIdN|A4DF+V\ql8B X-Hue: yellow X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:44:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:35:40 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Stefan Monnier wrote: > I don't think we should remove it, but we should definitely rename it > because nothing in "compile -vs- recompile" hints at the difference. > > We could rename it to "single-process-compile" or something like that. Done. This MS Windows bug is still open; maybe it can be closed, I don't know. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 18 16:40:17 2013 Received: (at 11707-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2013 21:40:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57771 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VtOqm-0000gw-Fn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:40:17 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:40542) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VtOqh-0000gj-00 for 11707-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:40:11 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtOqf-00073f-Sf; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:40:10 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 11707-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: pipeline arrangements Exon Shell quiche Bosnia COSCO X-Ran: .7cl5Wu7UMy-;+g#opa5~3H}"3/g`yM>6pllrbJ8-Gjc#tZmBfe{Ts?JWf"n)TvR#HnB$B X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:40:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:44:14 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11707-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) Version: 24.4 Since MS Windows now uses the same Makefiles as every other platform, not the makefile.w32-in files, this issue no longer applies. From unknown Tue Aug 19 14:23:22 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator