GNU bug report logs - #11663
Incorrect regexp match with explicitly numbered blocks

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Vitalie Spinu <spinuvit <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 23:28:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#11663: closed (Incorrect regexp match with explicitly
 numbered blocks )
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:58:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:55:23 +0200
with message-id <m2vcizr1fo.fsf <at> linux-m68k.org>
and subject line Re: bug#11663: Incorrect regexp match with explicitly numbered blocks
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #11663,
regarding Incorrect regexp match with explicitly numbered blocks 
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
11663: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11663
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Vitalie Spinu <spinuvit <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Incorrect regexp match with explicitly numbered blocks 
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 23:26:28 +0200
Hi, 

Assume this buffer's text. M-x regexp-builder and try this regexp
"\\(?:^Hi\\)" which works correctly. Modify to "\\(?2:^Hi\\)" and you
will see that ^ is taken literally and does not match bol anymore.

I've tried this in emacs 23 and on GNU Emacs 24.1.50.1
(i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2012-06-08 on lakoocha,
modified by Debian.

Vitalie.



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>
To: Vitalie Spinu <spinuvit <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 11663-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#11663: Incorrect regexp match with explicitly numbered blocks
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:55:23 +0200
Thanks for the report.  The problem was that at_begline_loc_p wasn't
updated when the `(?N:' syntax was added.  I have also fixed a problem
with preceding backslashes that causes the ^ in patterns like "\\\\(^a)"
to be incorrectly taken non-literally.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


This bug report was last modified 12 years and 354 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.