GNU bug report logs - #11649
Some compilation woes

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:23:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.1.50

Done: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 11649 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#11649: 24.1.50; Some compilation woes
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:52:19 +0300
> From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 21:28:28 +0200
> Cc: 11649 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> > Are you saying that there's some bug in the byte compiler?  You may be
> > right, although I don't see why the value 1200 should be OK, but 2200
> > shouldn't.
> 
> No, I'm saying that I don't see a problem in the way it is currently
> done on Windows because, at the end, even doing it as it is done in
> POSIX does not guarantee that you won't be forced to use a greater
> stack depth sooner or later, because it depends on the small number of
> files that are compiled with the interpreted byte-compiler, and these
> files are not static; they can grow bigger or more complex and
> eventually, someday, trigger the same stack depth error. Unless I've
> failed to understand you.

No, you understood me.  That's why I didn't hesitate to enlarge the
stack size.





This bug report was last modified 13 years and 57 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.