GNU bug report logs - #11643
Bug fixes in emacs-24

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>

Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:48:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 11643 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 11643 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#11643; Package emacs. (Thu, 07 Jun 2012 11:48:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Thu, 07 Jun 2012 11:48:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
To: bug-emacs <bug-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Bug fixes in emacs-24
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:45:17 +0100

Is there a policy on what bug fixes will, or can, be moved to the
emacs-24 branch? For example, I just noticed that bug #8954 (flymake
handles read-only directories badly) is not fixed in the branch, and
it looks to me like a straightforward low-impact fix that might be
accepted there.

I don't want to waste maintainers' time with requests for fixes that
won't be ported, hence would appreciate some general advice as well as
an opinion on this particular bug.

-- 
http://rrt.sc3d.org
Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#11643; Package emacs. (Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:06:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 11643 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
Cc: 11643 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#11643: Bug fixes in emacs-24
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:02:26 +0200

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org> wrote:

> Is there a policy on what bug fixes will, or can, be moved to the
> emacs-24 branch?

http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/150713

    Juanma
Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#11643; Package emacs. (Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:15:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 11643 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 11643 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#11643: Bug fixes in emacs-24
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:12:09 +0100

On 7 June 2012 13:02, Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org> wrote:
>
>> Is there a policy on what bug fixes will, or can, be moved to the
>> emacs-24 branch?
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/150713

Thanks; I hadn't seen the RC announcement!

-- 
http://rrt.sc3d.org
bug closed, send any further explanations to 11643 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org> Request was from Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:32:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:24:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 348 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.