GNU bug report logs - #11640
24.1.50; texinfo-format-printindex fails on Windows with Windows's sort

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Kazuhiro Ito <kzhr <at> d1.dion.ne.jp>

Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 17:00:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.1.50

Done: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 11640 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, kzhr <at> d1.dion.ne.jp, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
Subject: bug#11640: 24.1.50; texinfo-format-printindex fails on Windows with Windows's sort
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:23:46 +0300
> From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:49:58 +0200
> Cc: Kazuhiro Ito <kzhr <at> d1.dion.ne.jp>, 11640 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> 
> > Wouldn't it make sense to use it everywhere?
> 
> I don't know. That code was removed in revno:89810, and was only used
> for MS-DOS, Windows and VMS.

I agree with Andreas: if we have a built-in functionality, using it is
better than relying on an external program.

> I don't know the rationale for using the system sort on other
> OSes. Performance, perhaps?

How about tradition? ;-)

Seriously, I find it hard to believe that performance matters in this
case, especially since texinfmt.el is no longer the main recommended
way of producing Info from Texinfo, which is why it doesn't get
updated with the latest features of the Texinfo language.

Stefan, Chong, any objections to sorting the indices in Lisp in this
case?




This bug report was last modified 12 years and 345 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.