GNU bug report logs - #11611
closure? missing from 2.0.5 docs

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: David Jaquay <djaquay <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#11611: closed (Re: bug#11611: closure? missing from 2.0.5 docs)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:24:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#11611: closure? missing from 2.0.5 docs

which was filed against the guile package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 11611 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
11611: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11611
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: David Jaquay <djaquay <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 11611-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#11611: closure? missing from 2.0.5 docs
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:19:39 +0200

Hi,

‘closure?’ is deprecated in 2.0, hence its absence from the manual.
Users are directed to ‘procedure?’ instead.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: David Jaquay <djaquay <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: closure? missing from 2.0.5 docs
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:42:41 -0400

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

Section 6.9.7 mentions the procedure closure?, but doesn't document it
(with procedure? and thunk?).  (Very minor issue.)

Dave

[Message part 5 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.