Subject: bug#11611: closed (Re: bug#11611: closure? missing from 2.0.5 docs)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:24:03 +0000

Your bug report

#11611: closure? missing from 2.0.5 docs

which was filed against the guile package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
11611: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11611
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#11611: closure? missing from 2.0.5 docs
From: [email-masked] (Ludovic Courtès)
To: David Jaquay <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:19:39 +0200
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi,

‘closure?’ is deprecated in 2.0, hence its absence from the manual.
Users are directed to ‘procedure?’ instead.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Subject: closure? missing from 2.0.5 docs
From: David Jaquay <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:42:41 -0400
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

Section 6.9.7 mentions the procedure closure?, but doesn't document it
(with procedure? and thunk?).  (Very minor issue.)

Dave