Subject: Re: bug#11605: 24.1.50; vc-ediff revert annoyance

From: Dmitry Gutov <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:36:18 +0200

On 02/26/2016 08:01 AM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> If the buffer with the comparison file had been killed before all this
> had happened, we wouldn't have gotten the "file changed on disk" thing,
> yes...  That may be a better fix.

Maybe so. But I'm not sure it's easy to compute the exact buffer name, 
to kill it.

Or disable the automatic prompting somehow (add a NOWARN argument to 
vc-find-revision?), and call revert-buffer from ediff after.