From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 31 18:50:41 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2012 22:50:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52405 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SaECW-0006gX-9M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:50:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53257) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SaDqU-00068K-1T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:28:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SaDoo-00057n-6m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:26:11 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:35940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SaDoo-00057N-3G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:26:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SaDom-0005vG-FH for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:26:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SaDok-00052s-Ls for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:26:07 -0400 Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.161]:51663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SaDok-0004yJ-G3 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:26:06 -0400 X-RZG-AUTH: :P3UXYUWlW+jDoBmqEKgwMdSrGKSCJOlb2u4JE4NPYzG38DxH0tdVBKbowHnmGg== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from gw.fritz.box (static-87-79-68-213.netcologne.de [87.79.68.213]) by smtp.strato.de (joses mo26) (RZmta 29.10 AUTH) with ESMTPA id t02290o4VJS0Ql for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 00:26:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw.fritz.box (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E732048C for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 00:26:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fritz.box Received: from gw.fritz.box ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gw.fritz.box [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Anr3K15UPLtU for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 00:26:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.12.200] (vdr-big.fritz.box [192.168.12.200]) by gw.fritz.box (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776C620048 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 00:26:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: df calculus wrong? From: system To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: wody2001.de Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:26:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1338503161.3864.25.camel@vdr-big.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:50:39 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: system@wody2001.de List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Hello everybody, first of all let me say a big thank you -and all the others- for spending time and life donation to the GPL, FSF, .... world of Linux. I am not an developer but mathematics is one of my favs so how can the following explained? Command issued df -h response ----paste start ----- Dateisystem Größe Benut Verf Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/sda1 36G 25G 9,1G 73% / .... ----paste end ----- Circumstances and conditions: Ubuntu 10.04 lts server SDA is a physical SATA connected drive Installation language de Execution is done via ssh due to headless server system If size (Größe) is 36GB and occupied space (Benut) is 25GB -guess- remaining space (Verf) is below 10GB there must be a bug in calculation or in the way the first two values were derived from the system. If there would be a diff of +-1 digit nobody would think about but in this case there is a mismatch in the msd (most signifikant digit) I would really appreciate feedback that the mail is recieved and if there will be actions taken upon. Sincerely Sterzenbach From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 31 19:10:08 2012 Received: (at 11597-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2012 23:10:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52410 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SaEVL-00077c-Hk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 19:10:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14719) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SaEV0-00076R-LW for 11597-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 19:10:06 -0400 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4VN83ZS016637 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 31 May 2012 19:08:03 -0400 Received: from [10.36.116.54] (ovpn-116-54.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.54]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4VN81IX029884 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 31 May 2012 19:08:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4FC7F9D0.9000901@draigBrady.com> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:08:00 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?UMOhZHJhaWcgQnJhZHk=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: system@wody2001.de Subject: Re: bug#11597: df calculus wrong? References: <1338503161.3864.25.camel@vdr-big.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <1338503161.3864.25.camel@vdr-big.fritz.box> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mx1.redhat.com id q4VN83ZS016637 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11597-done Cc: 11597-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) tags 11597 notabug On 05/31/2012 11:26 PM, system wrote: > Hello everybody,=20 >=20 > first of all let me say a big thank you -and all the others- for > spending time and life donation to the GPL, FSF, .... world of Linux.=20 >=20 >=20 > I am not an developer but mathematics is one of my favs so how can the > following explained?=20 >=20 > Command issued=20 > df -h >=20 > response=20 > ----paste start ----- > Dateisystem Gr=C3=B6=C3=9Fe Benut Verf Ben% Eingeh=C3=A4ngt= auf > /dev/sda1 36G 25G 9,1G 73% / > .... > ----paste end ----- >=20 > Circumstances and conditions:=20 > Ubuntu 10.04 lts server > SDA is a physical SATA connected drive=20 > Installation language de > Execution is done via ssh due to headless server system >=20 > If size (Gr=C3=B6=C3=9Fe) is 36GB and occupied space (Benut) is 25GB -g= uess- > remaining space (Verf) is below 10GB there must be a bug in calculatio= n > or in the way the first two values were derived from the system.=20 > If there would be a diff of +-1 digit nobody would think about but in > this case there is a mismatch in the msd (most signifikant digit)=20 >=20 > I would really appreciate feedback that the mail is recieved and if > there will be actions taken upon.=20 There can be less available space due to reservations for example. I think the specific issue here is that 5% of the / file system is reserved for the root user and thus is not included in the generally available count returned by the file system. cheers, P=C3=A1draig. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 31 20:02:51 2012 Received: (at 11597) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2012 00:02:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52450 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SaFKM-0008Jn-QK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:02:51 -0400 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]:47906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SaFK1-0008JM-KK for 11597@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:02:48 -0400 Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B47211EE; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:00:51 -0600 (MDT) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 558722DC57; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:00:51 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:00:51 -0600 From: Bob Proulx To: system Subject: Re: bug#11597: df calculus wrong? Message-ID: <20120601000051.GA29967@hysteria.proulx.com> References: <1338503161.3864.25.camel@vdr-big.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1338503161.3864.25.camel@vdr-big.fritz.box> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11597 Cc: 11597@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) system wrote: > I am not an developer but mathematics is one of my favs so how can the > following explained?=20 >=20 > Command issued=20 > df -h >=20 > response=20 > ----paste start ----- > Dateisystem Gr=F6=DFe Benut Verf Ben% Eingeh=E4ngt auf > /dev/sda1 36G 25G 9,1G 73% / As P=E1draig noted this is minfree at work. 36G * 0.95 =3D 34.20 25G / 34.2G =3D 73% Please see this reference for more information. http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/#df-Size-and-Used-and-Availab= le-do-not-add-up Bob From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 31 20:04:21 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2012 00:04:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52454 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SaFLm-0008Lw-TY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:04:20 -0400 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]:47914) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SaFLj-0008Ln-J4 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:04:17 -0400 Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C19211EE for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:02:38 -0600 (MDT) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6C9F2DC57; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:02:37 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:02:37 -0600 From: Bob Proulx To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: update tags Message-ID: <20120601000237.GA32375@hysteria.proulx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) tag 11597 + notabug thanks From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:32:50 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator