From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11511: Input method of emacs Resent-From: ceason lam Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 16:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 11511 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 11511@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.133735803021583 (code B ref -1); Fri, 18 May 2012 16:21:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2012 16:20:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32966 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVPuk-0005c0-Dr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:20:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47384) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVO5F-0002qo-Sa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 10:23:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVO4n-0006yU-PB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 10:22:43 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:45746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVO4n-0006yH-JS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 10:22:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43621) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVO4h-0008Kk-9k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 10:22:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVO4c-0006pA-DB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 10:22:34 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:37339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVO4c-0006ow-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 10:22:30 -0400 Received: by obbwd18 with SMTP id wd18so5125830obb.0 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 07:22:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=X6UfTyDz1or97CMbqH+OAghBy/bD45Yoqvuqdct5xuA=; b=pMI7iGbpXHQ+GG7S2KqFTzh/i3NxsRHKq7a5w9QXBbns/jYO2gcqiNlIG81P8CwQsj JarGi3JXUGuLHqtMARSSxKdKMmru6PCE3V2KSqOrJAP/fsdsW6zJ2yAtyzdl6u3TZgrE suO70UG9gY1ZFVqpevIPEQZknjBK0RA8B2PKybyG22vYxcPmbRmg5vzI2RwJhvq9QDtI YRiAtobtjp5nAPX68jPCi6IZ0JTn2Ona683oYUYEl2pwthnAK0pCux1Pb7+E+Zlmobpq +EfVci0EVgVjCOcEwcW28MsWEY5gFiwxtZN3iF9/oVHhb9UNLBv0irgrFEAaC5jQbfSI C1PQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.167.40 with SMTP id zl8mr10641115obb.39.1337350948437; Fri, 18 May 2012 07:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.89.71 with HTTP; Fri, 18 May 2012 07:22:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 22:22:28 +0800 Message-ID: From: ceason lam Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f839edf38bf4f04c050482d X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:20:24 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) --e89a8f839edf38bf4f04c050482d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 since emacs port to GTK for a while i even hear a plan about GTK3 however, in my experience of emacs is very unfriendly to input method if an IM(input method) want to work with emacs the developer need to write a plug-in for it like scimbridge.el ibus.el uim.el if an IM have no plug-in, and if you want to use it in emacs due to outdated XIM in emacs , you will have some extra work (setting the locale, lang environment...) if the fixing not work , there is hopeless does this mean the emacs no more care about the foreigner why no the proper GTK-im interface a unified API for all the IM let the IM developer focus on improve their job and also let more IM can work along side with emacs please care about the uncountable CJK user for now and the future please update to the GTK im interface --e89a8f839edf38bf4f04c050482d Content-Type: text/html; charset=Big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
since emacs port to GTK for a while
i even h= ear a plan about GTK3

however, in my experience of emacs is very un= friendly to input method
if an IM(input method) want to work with emacs=
the developer need to write a plug-in for it

like 
scimbridge.el
ibus.el
uim.el

if an IM have = no plug-in, and if you want to use it in emacs
due to outdated XIM in e= macs , you will have some extra work (setting the locale, lang environment.= ..)
if the fixing not work , there is hopeless 

does this mean the= emacs no more care about the foreigner 

why no the proper GTK= -im interface=A1@
a unified API for all the IM
let the IM developer = focus on improve their job
and also let more IM can work along side with emacs
 

please= care about the uncountable CJK user for now and the future
please update to the GTK im interface
--e89a8f839edf38bf4f04c050482d-- From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11511: Input method of emacs Resent-From: Miles Bader Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 23:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11511 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: ceason lam Cc: 11511@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11511-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11511.133738220128015 (code B ref 11511); Fri, 18 May 2012 23:04:01 +0000 Received: (at 11511) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2012 23:03:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33303 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVWCf-0007Ho-9v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:03:21 -0400 Received: from smtp12.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.74]:55603) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVWCK-0007H3-V8 for 11511@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:03:20 -0400 Received: from 218.231.234.39.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([218.231.234.39] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp12.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) (envelope-from ) id 1SVWBv-0001Dj-81; Sat, 19 May 2012 08:02:35 +0900 Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 389A2E006; Sat, 19 May 2012 08:02:34 +0900 (JST) From: Miles Bader References: System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 08:02:34 +0900 In-Reply-To: (ceason lam's message of "Fri, 18 May 2012 22:22:28 +0800") Message-ID: <87r4uhjdo5.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Lines: 23 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) ceason lam writes: > however, in my experience of emacs is very unfriendly to input method > if an IM(input method) want to work with emacs > the developer need to write a plug-in for it ... > if an IM have no plug-in, and if you want to use it in emacs > due to outdated XIM in emacs , you will have some extra work (setting the > locale, lang environment...) > if the fixing not work , there is hopeless > > does this mean the emacs no more care about the foreigner Hmm, what...? I'm using Gnome 3 &etc with the external Japanese input method "mozc", and it seems to work fine with Emacs... Can you give more detail about what the problem is? -Miles --=20 values of =CE=B2 will give rise to dom! From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11511: Input method of emacs Resent-From: theceason@gmail.com Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 09:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11511 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: gnu.emacs.bug@googlegroups.com Cc: ceason lam , 11511@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11511-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11511.133742011420156 (code B ref 11511); Sat, 19 May 2012 09:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 11511) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2012 09:35:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33654 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVg49-0005F2-3f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2012 05:35:14 -0400 Received: from mail-vb0-f64.google.com ([209.85.212.64]:36394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVg44-0005En-1D for 11511@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2012 05:35:12 -0400 Received: by vbnl22 with SMTP id l22so3367238vbn.9 for <11511@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 May 2012 02:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.221.170 with SMTP id qf10mr1560256pbc.4.1337420075542; Sat, 19 May 2012 02:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Path: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 02:34:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=218.190.229.78; posting-account=4oIixgoAAABtaCfqji-D6GG2r28JCB7t NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.190.229.78 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-IP: 218.190.229.78 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <523a334b-b180-4024-9f1c-7c409d2e5120@googlegroups.com> From: theceason@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Miles Bader=E6=96=BC 2012=E5=B9=B45=E6=9C=8819=E6=97=A5=E6=98=9F=E6=9C=9F= =E5=85=ADUTC+8=E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=887=E6=99=8202=E5=88=8634=E7=A7=92=E5=AF=AB= =E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > ceason lam writes: > > however, in my experience of emacs is very unfriendly to input method > > if an IM(input method) want to work with emacs > > the developer need to write a plug-in for it > ... > > if an IM have no plug-in, and if you want to use it in emacs > > due to outdated XIM in emacs , you will have some extra work (setting t= he > > locale, lang environment...) > > if the fixing not work , there is hopeless > > > > does this mean the emacs no more care about the foreigner >=20 > Hmm, what...? >=20 > I'm using Gnome 3 &etc with the external Japanese input method "mozc", > and it seems to work fine with Emacs... >=20 > Can you give more detail about what the problem is? >=20 > -Miles >=20 > --=20 > values of =CE=B2 will give rise to dom! hi Mikle i am great to hear your barrier free mozc experience=20 i use ibus along side with emacs too (maybe i should change 'im' to input = method editor) in this case i need ibus.el (it work very well) if i use other im :gcin, fcitx.. etc for my experience gcin emacs is the only gtk program can't work with ubuntu environment but it can run faultless in debian=20 and alos windows ...... if problem happened many of us suffer form LC_CTYPE settings for more example here is a recent one=20 bug#10867: 23.4 must export LC_CTYPE to zh_CN.UTF-8 or similar CJK locale t= o use X input method http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2012-02/msg00761.html and this fixing some time work some time not=20 and it happen since we know emacs=20 i am chinese=20 i am cant repersent other j k people (mikle have you test other ime) i love to spend my time to configuring my emacs just like the other does but for uim.el ibus.el scimbridge.el these are not confirgruings=20 these are fixings=20 -------------------------------------------- we love emacs because it's free=20 this is also gnu's belief=20 hope is emacs can maintain our freedom=20 rather than you not like it just don't use it From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11511: Input method of emacs Resent-From: theceason@gmail.com Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11511 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: gnu.emacs.bug@googlegroups.com Cc: ceason lam , 11511@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11511-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11511.133743686816147 (code B ref 11511); Sat, 19 May 2012 14:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 11511) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2012 14:14:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34464 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVkQN-0004CN-Po for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2012 10:14:27 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:62570) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVkQ3-0004BS-1I for 11511@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2012 10:14:25 -0400 Received: by qadb10 with SMTP id b10so1119679qad.16 for <11511@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 May 2012 07:13:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.234.166 with SMTP id uf6mr1878099pbc.18.1337436813558; Sat, 19 May 2012 07:13:33 -0700 (PDT) Path: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 07:13:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <523a334b-b180-4024-9f1c-7c409d2e5120@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=218.190.229.78; posting-account=4oIixgoAAABtaCfqji-D6GG2r28JCB7t NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.190.229.78 References: <523a334b-b180-4024-9f1c-7c409d2e5120@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-IP: 218.190.229.78 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: From: theceason@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) maybe i should provide more information in some case the xim failure to work the ime tigger C- will still remain the set mark function if we unset it then C- will be not defined however the ime is work fine with other gtk apps with the tigger c- when you try ibus without ibus.el i believe you will encounter this problem i think since emacs already port to gtk why not give it a gtk im interface the solve the long term problem here is a bug report in 2005 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2005-April/028398.html From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 25 18:15:34 2015 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2015 23:15:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36021 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbaA-0005mR-9h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:15:34 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:33005) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCba8-0005jZ-CW for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:15:32 -0500 Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbZl-0006W2-2m for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:15:09 +0100 Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:15:08 +0100 Message-Id: <87fuyqqfwj.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #11511 X-MailScanner-ID: 1aCbZl-0006W2-2m X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451690111.30053@GMlog0Rd9LhhqnJd7ElHyA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) tags 11511 - moreinfo From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11511: Input method of emacs Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 17:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11511 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: theceason@gmail.com Cc: 11511@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11511-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11511.16310364219599 (code B ref 11511); Tue, 07 Sep 2021 17:41:01 +0000 Received: (at 11511) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2021 17:40:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57576 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNf53-0002Uk-1m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 13:40:21 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50020) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNf51-0002UP-FZ for 11511@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 13:40:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=AIWhNK/aRQm/LCYRs/BaXbtbroM6zbpY3b+G/+mNSZI=; b=pJZb6TlpP2GE+p2gr7UH1hHeNV MScKKnC7VfQbAjLEqzj2K0gp3Td6f3IuuAG5rhZqG09aG2gUL8S71LkopeReTLYeAwJT6LYIHZJqu g7VEK72PsffNr4qzUUAMS6rzZ2xIhH2HQSr4bJ8ybLK1SlEmVgpK6XA15chAPIq/PzKc=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNf4s-0008O3-H3; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 19:40:12 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <523a334b-b180-4024-9f1c-7c409d2e5120@googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 19:40:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: (theceason@gmail.com's message of "Sat, 19 May 2012 07:13:33 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <87bl54b7yd.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: theceason@gmail.com writes: > maybe i should provide more information > > in some case the xim failure to work > > the ime tigger C- will still remain the set mark function > if we unset it then C- will be not defined [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) theceason@gmail.com writes: > maybe i should provide more information > > in some case the xim failure to work > > the ime tigger C- will still remain the set mark function > if we unset it then C- will be not defined > however the ime is work fine with other gtk apps with the tigger c- > when you try ibus without ibus.el > i believe you will encounter this problem (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) I'm not quite sure I understand the issue here -- there's plenty of people who use Emacs with XIM. Are you still seeing these issues in recent Emacs versions? If so, can you give a recipe, starting from "emacs -Q" that reproduces the problem? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 07 13:40:24 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2021 17:40:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57579 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNf56-0002V0-9F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 13:40:24 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNf54-0002UU-Ge for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 13:40:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ayJ38rfP0IIL41PQ8DQ8hZZZ6X+XPqO7WoIHaXngWmI=; b=vL82zPrqljVErRfnVtgv0qcP3d 1cWc60+h1bXQhuOG0zpHGHKbhDvpdre2dclan4QppYssxw22JzqOtiGeytNQQSp5jHxBMhS0ejfGG SKGSdMtmvTyb+hPVylKoamsvEyRdoyp6y2ao8kBDQ6PKYx/Jta//V08stGKDedQo6Qik=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNf4x-0008OC-2O for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 19:40:17 +0200 Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 19:40:14 +0200 Message-Id: <87a6kob7y9.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #11511 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 11511 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 11511 + moreinfo quit From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11511: Input method of emacs Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 09:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11511 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: theceason@gmail.com Cc: 11511@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11511-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11511.163351292828570 (code B ref 11511); Wed, 06 Oct 2021 09:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 11511) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2021 09:35:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42580 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mY3Kh-0007Qk-Sn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 05:35:28 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51836) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mY3Kf-0007QS-Sh for 11511@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 05:35:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MNRgKHbJTc0mt23rlpRlZqqZrAGOqZvDJVSTNMPDPM0=; b=fw8gpEdHrr/QQkX9FnqEyVuARc OMSlLcVLTFSQ5Yu4OtBz5jffgOgH/Cj47vNSN5mErMTwB3Yfi+QpEEx5GAtQnkkUmPBR4o/o0rdbg k1cs1F+vkw18ehFUBP368wsioiaq9Po4UiRDLKsWudm1jemiHYpy/DZYwniHplJujBMo=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mY3KX-0000Y1-U3; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 11:35:20 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <523a334b-b180-4024-9f1c-7c409d2e5120@googlegroups.com> <87bl54b7yd.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Stephan Mathieu's _Radiance (10): Her Dark Gaze Drowned in Light_: "Abend" Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 11:35:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87bl54b7yd.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 07 Sep 2021 19:40:10 +0200") Message-ID: <87r1cycx7u.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I'm not quite sure I understand the issue here -- there's plenty of > people who use Emacs with XIM. Are you still seeing these issues in > recent Emacs versions? If so, can you give a recipe, start [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I'm not quite sure I understand the issue here -- there's plenty of > people who use Emacs with XIM. Are you still seeing these issues in > recent Emacs versions? If so, can you give a recipe, starting from > "emacs -Q" that reproduces the problem? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 06 05:35:32 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2021 09:35:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42583 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mY3Km-0007R1-3q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 05:35:32 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51860) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mY3Kj-0007QZ-TW for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 05:35:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dnnF1blKD+31MArYEPCOuwaQCdnE15yRt/neKiR2pXE=; b=B1vwHGVIhGMQ7TGf1WsQbCXGz4 nIzfMFJ6/HJPE/RvXxQH1pErQmR6FER/CvWgKjrvhgd/BAScwbLiWjY00kpvPmzG8HPFzuaY79s29 52Cr4Bi7XpTyzE+VGFcDGWL43m0xc6GaPFAoKy1thviiiAQgwP+aWBU8LshwkURUNKqE=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mY3Kc-0000YE-F9 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 11:35:24 +0200 Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 11:35:22 +0200 Message-Id: <87pmsicx7p.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #11511 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 11511 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 11511 quit