Subject: Re: bug#11508: 24.1.50; Off-by-one error in xg_select?

From: Ken Brown <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 18:44:59 -0400

On 5/19/2012 5:52 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jan Djärv<[email-masked]>  writes:
>
>> So the question is, is it more effective to give select the exact value
>> (select works fine if nfds has a higher value than strictly neccessary),
>> or always increment by one in lines 78 and 83?
>
> IMHO it doesn't hurt to be exact, and the patch removes an inconsistency
> which makes it easier to understand the code.

So can I go ahead and make this change?  Jan, do you still object?

Ken