GNU bug report logs -
#11506
24.1.50; "C-x z" ("repeat") no longer works correctly with M-x
Previous Next
Full log
Message #20 received at 11506 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Is there a problem with the automatic mailing of bug-thread messages, or is
there perhaps a problem with my mail server?
I sent two messages to this bug thread, and never received those mails from the
bug list. But they showed up on the archive site OK:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11506#15
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11506#17
Similarly, I received Stefan's reply to the first of these directly from him,
but I did not receive his message from the bug address.
If there is a mail problem at the Emacs BUGS end, is it perhaps only for the
<N>-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org address? If so, can that please be fixed? Whatever
discussion continues in a bug thread should be echoed to the bug mailing list,
no?
If not, I will no doubt have to manually remove "-done" from the cc address from
now on (or else add the address without "-done", in addition to "-done").
Users do not pay a lot of attention to the cc addresses when they hit `Reply
All'. This bug server automatically changes the address from
<N>@debbugs.gnu.org to <N>-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, which is arguably not very user
friendly to begin with (changing recipient lists is not a great idea).
If we cannot figure out a better way to handle routing/classifying messages than
simply changing addresses, too bad. But can't we at least continue to echo the
discussion to <N>@debbugs.gnu.org (as well as cc or bcc it to
<N>-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org), so that readers of the thread receive the message?
The classification of a bug is not the same thing as the end of the discussion
of it.
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 350 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.