Subject: bug#11447: 24.1.50; notifications-notify eats keystrokes

From: Michael Albinus <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 17:15:37 +0200

Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]> writes:

>> Yes, that happens with your proposed
>
>> (setq unread-command-events
>>       (append unread-command-events (nreverse seen)))))
>
> Note that I only do it at the end of the loop, so it shouldn't affect
> the sit-for.

You do it inside the loop, every next loop cycle unread-command-events
could be non-nil, which confuses read-event.

Maybe you wanted to cumulate the read events in seen inside the loop,
and you wanted to append all events from seen to unread-command-events
outside the loop. That might work.

(Likely it isn't that important which version of the patch we use ...)

>         Stefan

Best regards, Michael..