GNU bug report logs - #11424
coreutils: split tests hang on /dev/zero on GNU/Hurd

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault <at> gnu.org>

Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 00:59:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #31 received at 11424 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault <at> gnu.org>, 11424 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#11424: coreutils: split tests hang on /dev/zero on GNU/Hurd
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 18:39:41 +0200
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 05/08/2012 01:39 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I went ahead and pushed the less-invasive fix.
>
> Hmm, I don't see this on Savannah; is this part
> of the problem where usable_st_size got pushed?

Ahh... I think I know what happened.
I had both the usable_st_size and split-hang-fix patches on a temporary
branch and ran git rebase -i HEAD~2 intending to delete the
usable_st_size change set just before pushing.  Obviously I removed
the other instead.

I've just pushed the split-hang-fix patch, along with a
gnulib-updating patch that also pulls in the latest
init.sh and bootstrap scripts.

>> Your behavior-changing one is more than welcome, too.
>
> I came up with a better idea, and propose this patch
> instead.  The idea is to fall back on lseek if
> st_size is not reliable.  This allows the programs
> to work in more cases, including the case in question.
> One test case needs to be removed because it assumes
> a command must fail, where it now typically works.

Thanks!  I'll look at it this evening.

...
> Subject: [PATCH] maint: handle file sizes more reliably
>
> Problem reported by Samuel Thibault in <http://debbugs.gnu.org/11424>.
> * NEWS: Document this.
> * src/dd.c (skip):
> * src/split.c (main):
> * src/truncate.c (do_ftruncate, main):
> On files where st_size is not portable, fall back on using lseek
> with SEEK_END to determine the size.  Although strictly speaking
> POSIX says the behavior is implementation-defined, in practice
> if lseek returns a nonnegative value it's a reasonable one to
> use for the file size.
> * src/dd.c (dd_copy): It's OK to truncate shared memory objects.
> * src/du.c (duinfo_add): Check for overflow.
> (print_only_size): Report overflow.
> (process_file): Ignore negative file sizes in the --apparent-size case.
> * src/od.c (skip): Fix comment about st_size.
> * src/stat.c (print_stat): Don't report negative sizes as huge
> positive ones.
> * src/system.h (usable_st_size): Symlinks have reliable st_size too.
> * tests/misc/truncate-dir-fail: Don't assume that getting the size
> of a dir is not allowed, as it's now allowed on many platforms,
> e.g., GNU/Linux.




This bug report was last modified 13 years and 15 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.