From xma@gnu.org Fri Oct 10 17:30:54 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Oct 2008 00:30:54 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9B0UorC016269 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:30:51 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:60189 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KoSLH-00081g-E7 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:28:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KoSNa-0003bd-Tz for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:30:48 -0400 Received: from master.uucpssh.org ([193.218.105.66]:40123) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KoSNZ-0003bC-AH for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:30:45 -0400 Received: by master.uucpssh.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9F5EAF53D4; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:29:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zogzog.maillard.mobi (IDENT:1000@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zogzog.maillard.mobi (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9B00e9B001286 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:00:40 +0200 Received: (from xma@localhost) by zogzog.maillard.mobi (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id m9B00eRv001285; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:00:40 +0200 Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:00:40 +0200 Message-Id: <200810110000.m9B00eRv001285@zogzog.maillard.mobi> From: Xavier Maillard To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Subject: 23.0.60; RMAIL: undigestify-rmail-message weird output Organization: GNU's Not UNIX! User-Agent: Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.60.12 on GNU/Linux Jabber-ID: xma01@jabber.fr Reply-to: Xavier Maillard X-uucpssh: Found to be clean X-uucpssh-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.965, required 4.6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.28, BAYES_00 -2.60, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00, TW_GZ 0.08, TW_OG 0.08, UPPERCASE_25_50 0.00) X-uucpssh-From: xma@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) With latest emacs (CVS), M-x undigestify-rmail-message is producing weird output from perfectly valid mailman digest. In fact, I have to M-x undigestify-rmail-message several times before I can "browse" the messages. When doing the first u-r-m, I obtain three messages: 1. The TOC message 2. a new digest file (buggy) 3. A "footer" message If I really want to read the different messages, I have to M-x u-r-m on the second message. Sometimes it is even not enough and I have to do it again. The odd thing is that, the resulted messages are unanswerable (pressing r lead to an error) except if I edit the (e) message to reformat it correctly. I am pretty sure it was already the case with emacs 22.x if it can help. In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.12 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.9) of 2008-10-10 on zogzog configured using `configure '--without-xft'' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: en_US.UTF-8 value of $LC_CTYPE: fr_FR.UTF-8 value of $LC_MESSAGES: en_US.UTF-8 value of $LC_MONETARY: fr_FR.UTF-8 value of $LC_NUMERIC: en_US.UTF-8 value of $LC_TIME: en_US.UTF-8 value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default-enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: RMAIL Summary Minor modes in effect: diff-auto-refine-mode: t rcirc-track-minor-mode: t eev-mode: t shell-dirtrack-mode: t jabber-activity-mode: t auto-insert-mode: t global-hi-lock-mode: t hi-lock-mode: t show-paren-mode: t global-auto-revert-mode: t display-time-mode: t recentf-mode: t icomplete-mode: t desktop-save-mode: t auto-image-file-mode: t tooltip-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t global-auto-composition-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t column-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t abbrev-mode: t Recent input: [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ D ESC [ C C-k ESC [ B ESC [ B C-a C-@ ESC [ B ESC [ B C-w ESC [ A RET C t x : SPC DEL ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B RET M s g : ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B ESC [ B - - - RET C a t e t DEL g r DEL o r y E m a c s SPC I n b o x C-x C-s C-x o d h C-x 1 7 5 9 j SPC SPC SPC SPC SPC SPC SPC SPC SPC SPC SPC C-x 1 C-l ESC x u n d i DEL DEL DEL DEL C-g ESC x r e p o TAB TAB r TAB RET Recent messages: scanning todo...done scanning recent...done scanning random...done Computing summary lines...done Quit Making completion list... Killing buffer *Completions* Scanning for dabbrevs...100% dabbrev-expand: No dynamic expansion for `undige' found Quit Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org From rgm@gnu.org Thu Nov 13 11:46:38 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_SUBJECT, NOSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Nov 2008 19:46:38 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mADJkZGV031304 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:46:36 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1L0i9B-0006J1-Rh; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:46:33 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18716.33817.792702.119282@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:46:33 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: magenta X-Ran: .Fe~GBFjR)'vxl/z?t:iBi=y~0x.5aF_~iKy_U9kS?#?HZ]Spup)TM/'6/rPN*FiySQ=;t X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes close 1138 tags 1140 moreinfo From rgm@gnu.org Fri Nov 13 12:28:53 2009 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Nov 2009 20:28:54 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,ONEWORD,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nADKSqGQ031044 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:28:53 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1N92lH-00024p-Uq; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:28:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19197.49539.921874.392388@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:28:51 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: control reassign 4871 emacs,ns reassign 4908 spam tags 4910 moreinfo reaassign 4918 spam reassign 4919 spam tags 1134 = reassign 1134 emacs,rmail reassign 2624 emacs,rmail reassign 364 emacs,rmail reassign 1140 emacs,rmail reassign 4448 emacs,rmail reassign 158 emacs,etags tags 4142 = reassign 4863 emacs,etags reassign 2807 emacs,etags reassign 2008 emacs,etags reassign 2544 emacs,etags From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 10 21:54:15 2011 Received: (at 1140-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2011 01:54:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg5hP-0005RA-4k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:54:15 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg5hN-0005Qy-1b for 1140-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:54:13 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44609) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg5hH-0008R9-KG; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:54:07 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 1140-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#1140: 23.0.60; RMAIL: undigestify-rmail-message weird output References: <200810110000.m9B00eRv001285@zogzog.maillard.mobi> X-Spook: CESID SDI lynch ANC AMW Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Legion of X-Ran: R.fRW4FlR/V=:*T9_gxjJ!m\i0paDrGOARU-u]9-f+hbX&a&m=tEVQ> X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:54:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200810110000.m9B00eRv001285@zogzog.maillard.mobi> (Xavier Maillard's message of "Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:00:40 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 1140-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) This report is being closed because we cannot do anything with the information provided. We really need a recipe to reproduce the problem, probably including an example digest message that shows the issue (this could be sent off list if there are privacy concerns). If you still see this issue with 23.3, please reply and we can reopen the report if needed. From unknown Thu Aug 21 12:12:15 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 12 20:00:27 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2012 01:00:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36626 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TY4rb-000200-AO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:00:27 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:34458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TY4ra-0001zu-BI for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:00:26 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY4r9-0006R5-DI for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:59:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:59:59 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 1140 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) unarchive 1140 forcemerge 12873 1140 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 02 16:49:05 2016 Received: (at 1140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2016 21:49:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35657 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aFU2r-0004LE-KM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 16:49:05 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.220.170]:36546) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aFU2q-0004Ke-07; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 16:49:04 -0500 Received: by mail-qk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id q19so62238172qke.3; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 13:49:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=u7AOP1WEo2ACDiLM1JHXGmcn3X8hgUyYNwDFv5kaOMo=; b=ILCtZjzB9+0A+X4T+MlayEWmSztT37dC7slVlasZ+4N0MtvbZKao5NNdo6uqxyO/OX x+JO6L8u/XsBEDqxXRLP11/0bxC5lXLeBtiH7x6B7o68nOd12CJoZlQtAfb38w/HK1IZ bi+Z5sDChEC8LzTXgXe89P0hF1exkQ7aF883nVYGkET9J1K5aD0DXaHdgZ4xe63pCe2E lFKIDabNlaaR1/9M8aopy5Q4AdHkygULgnyluw8bnl0nyfNWZ8EUviH6j9dmAQ9leWXd QS+DpCAadpvXhmM3k6lxlMrC06Je7Y+zhHE7xPYaZjYg36/KRB2XQYvRLBox0FEpyB5q TR9Q== X-Received: by 10.55.75.203 with SMTP id y194mr83912807qka.2.1451771338492; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 13:48:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from Andrews-MacBook-Pro.local.ahyatt-laptop (cpe-74-73-128-199.nyc.res.rr.com. [74.73.128.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p17sm36800262qhb.34.2016.01.02.13.48.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Jan 2016 13:48:57 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Hyatt To: Xavier Maillard Subject: Re: bug#12873: 24.2; undigestify-rmail-message in emacs 24.x still doesn't split a digest References: <201211122117.qACLHr8K017024@kcals.intra.maillard.im> <1mehjylbhu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <201211122251.qACMphhm019056@kcals.intra.maillard.im> Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 16:48:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201211122251.qACMphhm019056@kcals.intra.maillard.im> (Xavier Maillard's message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:51:43 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 1140 Cc: 1140@debbugs.gnu.org, Glenn Morris , 12873@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Xavier Maillard writes: >> I'm afraid it did not attach correctly: > > Bug ? :D Let's try again > > Xavier Thanks, I can confirm this is still a problem in emacs 25. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 23 08:35:29 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2022 13:35:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44276 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nMrnl-000278-JU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:35:29 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34510) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nMrnj-00026s-Hn for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:35:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9OiXe+QiQvpAmqURNhfrt8T4/XN5sQN04VcVZUFxYlo=; b=cwEXZYsZSSj/XUp1r1YgvHw76c fnRWM53ujgq85H9Qir+rWSMckKGf87wcuEtXgqC3zyM2AwVgMMzDIXvlPMMd9H83/gMCdE8G1glEa /1JPtdkilNBlb0q7mfTu1MmZfcyFnbtZudKNVp3tClh6riDeP5LsvqIYm0+DDV/slCmo=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nMrnb-0001zU-6U for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:35:21 +0100 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:35:16 +0100 Message-Id: <878ru17lkb.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #12873 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 12873 + patch quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 12873 + patch quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 23 15:43:55 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2022 19:43:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46088 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nX6tf-0002j9-13 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:43:55 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:49876) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nX6td-0002ik-Kn for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:43:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1lJIEf82v4QdeNWBwAwG4JbSBtmeTe3/Wckpc5pOAic=; b=iFplthkt2MWIZXrbw9kDZQ/Ek6 yqE6ts1zraC5UQtka3jBVxUu0vA1oI316k5JyazTTDzdHQCNFYNu0eB2u7gZpLFq1ZipAXBpFe7Wc oSPrn7YtdpT1duEbMDbKmW0Q82nMOA4Y8YzK0kZjt8KvJA1DcFef/viK4b4T4jZjdjlE=; Received: from 109.179.236.69.tmi.telenormobil.no ([109.179.236.69] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nX6tW-0007ZA-1p for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:43:47 +0100 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:43:45 +0100 Message-Id: <878rt078um.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #12873 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 12873 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 12873 29.1 quit From unknown Thu Aug 21 12:12:15 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator