GNU bug report logs - #11386
C++11 support: C++ mode gets (temporarily) confused by edits to convert "> >" to ">>" in templates

Previous Next

Packages: cc-mode, emacs;

Reported by: James Dennett <jdennett <at> googlers.com>

Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:18:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: RĂ¼diger Sonderfeld <ruediger <at> c-plusplus.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
To: R?diger Sonderfeld <ruediger <at> c-plusplus.de>
Cc: 11386 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#11386: C++11 support: C++ mode gets (temporarily) confused by	edits to convert "> >" to ">>" in templates
Date: 18 Nov 2014 21:15:19 -0000
Guten Abend, Ruediger.

In article <mailman.13959.1416330148.1147.bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org> you wrote:
> tags 11386 fixed

> Should be fixed in 66bb9533fc77963c495de7f33ec6dc8e4d342a55

OUTCH!!!

Any chance you could be a little more informative with messages like this,
please?

The message as it stands suggests "I have just committed a fix as revision
66bb95...".  The id 66bb95..., like all ids in git, carries no context,
no age, no nothing.

Better would have been to use the "present perfect" tense: "Should have
been fixed in 66bb95...", which would have placed the action of fixing
in the non-immediate past.

Better still would have been to give details of the fix, something like
"Should have been fixed in 66bb953... by Alan Mackenzie in August, title
line "Make ">>" act as double template ender in C++ Mode."".

Possibly the best thing of all would have been to construct an Eric
Raymond style commit identifier, but I haven't got the syntax memorised
yet.

Any of these would have prevented me errupting in uncalled-for panic and
fury.

Thanks!

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).







This bug report was last modified 10 years and 243 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.