From unknown Fri Aug 15 16:18:32 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#11376 <11376@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#11376 <11376@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.1.50; Different color before and after code, eg. before code is #ffffff but after is #fefefe Reply-To: bug#11376 <11376@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 23:18:32 +0000 retitle 11376 24.1.50; Different color before and after code, eg. before co= de is #ffffff but after is #fefefe reassign 11376 emacs submitter 11376 jasox severity 11376 normal tag 11376 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 28 18:05:39 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2012 22:05:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57230 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOFlq-0001ea-EA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:05:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56174) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SODSd-0005ml-B7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:37:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SODRM-00023W-Tg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:36:22 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:47913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SODRM-00023S-OA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:36:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SODRK-000146-GJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:36:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SODRH-00023G-KW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:36:17 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:53608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SODRH-00023C-87 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:36:15 -0400 Received: by werj55 with SMTP id j55so1444840wer.0 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:36:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:content-type:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=3yK9LgIOvFN7b7r8EOf0DcPNmu0YxW90ouTIRQkJDNc=; b=ULpJUNM66ZsVghdAv9OwCSJfgcBvrMYrs5x7xX6m9pZbeKKUEwM4K/frhoA7vB+jpp UtqZeKtmF2Ersgs9VfIGmS7nibr9MGaOyN2b+o7ap/cnfPLnITMklTaGy/x+U9eyR6oh AHumAi40VD/EOvcBvJoT8tK+pflMtdhUfBB/aAAi1C6eXWNWsAf5SbDsgrFNMg2PcWEI HpDRIFeJv+mYVpEuhOswamm4vCKI6TCn6CiNXibu1hyAExyYp/DUeKyjfFHxenfkBg/H CIJAbK1cobkiBgvNR7bSWjcAeCZZxMAcWDR4WDylr7zG+oKLl1iVQcvHB8Vs5QspzuVD 0CQg== Received: by 10.180.8.231 with SMTP id u7mr16522616wia.9.1335641772266; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([178.239.26.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o2sm23671488wiv.11.2012.04.28.12.36.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> Subject: 24.1.50; Different color before and after code, eg. before code is #ffffff but after is #fefefe From: jasox To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 21:36:34 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:05:37 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) This bug report will be sent to the Bug-GNU-Emacs mailing list and the GNU bug tracker at debbugs.gnu.org. Please check that the From: line contains a valid email address. After a delay of up to one day, you should receive an acknowledgement at that address. Please write in English if possible, as the Emacs maintainers usually do not have translators for other languages. Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug, and the precise symptoms of the bug. If you can, give a recipe starting from `emacs -Q': If Emacs crashed, and you have the Emacs process in the gdb debugger, please include the output from the following gdb commands: `bt full' and `xbacktrace'. For information about debugging Emacs, please read the file /usr/share/emacs/24.1.50/etc/DEBUG. In GNU Emacs 24.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.1) of 2012-04-23 on zelenka, modified by Debian (emacs-snapshot package, version 2:20120423-1) Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11104000 Configured using: `configure '--build' 'x86_64-linux-gnu' '--host' 'x86_64-linux-gnu' '--prefix=/usr' '--sharedstatedir=/var/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/lib' '--localstatedir=/var' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-pop=yes' '--enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs-snapshot:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/24.1.50/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/24.1.50/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp' '--without-compress-info' '--with-crt-dir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/' '--with-x=yes' '--with-x-toolkit=gtk3' '--with-imagemagick=yes' 'build_alias=x86_64-linux-gnu' 'host_alias=x86_64-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-DDEBIAN -DSITELOAD_PURESIZE_EXTRA=5000 -g -O2'' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: en_US.utf8 value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Lisp Minor modes in effect: paredit-mode: t yas/global-mode: t yas/minor-mode: t global-auto-complete-mode: t show-paren-mode: t eldoc-mode: t slime-mode: t tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t column-number-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-x 3 C-x 1 C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-a C-p C-p C-c M-q C-x C-s C-x C-= C-x C-= C-= C-= C-= C-x C-- C-- C-- C-- C-- M-x r e p o r Recent messages: Connecting to Swank on port 60415.. Connected. Jasox, this could be the start of a beautiful program. driver.lisp has auto save data; consider M-x recover-this-file [Complete but not unique] byte-code: Beginning of buffer [12 times] Mark set Saving file /home/jasox/Projects/lisp-Projects/bunnyslayer/driver.lisp... Wrote /home/jasox/Projects/lisp-Projects/bunnyslayer/driver.lisp byte-code: Beginning of buffer [15 times] Making completion list... Load-path shadows: Don't be too harsh this is my first emacs bug report, I hope so I done it well. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 28 19:26:54 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2012 23:26:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57285 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOH2U-0003TS-3N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:26:54 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42042 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOH2S-0003TL-Nx for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:26:53 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOH1G-0008Oh-O4; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:25:38 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: jasox Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different color before and after code, eg. before code is #ffffff but after is #fefefe References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> X-Spook: plutonium rs9512c condor Attorney General Jiang Zemin X-Ran: KdAJrd26kcEQd!OVMJmHuXen9QM:+!WUqrrCHrha5a7t6zLqO~".>Xc+M[f&FjR2CFSnUx X-Hue: green X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:25:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> (jasox's message of "Sat, 28 Apr 2012 21:36:34 +0200") Message-ID: <88ty03o2vh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 Cc: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) jasox wrote: > Don't be too harsh this is my first emacs bug report, I hope so I done > it well. Sorry, I'm going to be pretty harsh, because as far as I can see, you haven't actually written a bug report, and I have no idea what the problem is supposed to be. Start by answering this: > Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug, and > the precise symptoms of the bug. If you can, give a recipe > starting from `emacs -Q': From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 29 03:47:16 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2012 07:47:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57445 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOOqh-000764-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:47:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36538) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOOqN-00075J-T1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:47:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOOp4-0003Bf-QP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:45:36 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:50871) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOOp4-0003Bb-Ki for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:45:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44527) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOOp2-0006NT-El for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:45:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOOp0-0003BG-9U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:45:31 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:38864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOOp0-0003BA-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:45:30 -0400 Received: by werj55 with SMTP id j55so1629488wer.0 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:45:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:content-type:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=2LkTCwFqfYzFTJrOCzH8F+lnvb8HMLvdHSpeVsuuYrk=; b=Rl3F5RUO6hTH8GtZyTRwX+FIUOgsD2az3TXuM6tHkYC39awfuaRdIfjiR2mK4TXVmX 5vJa7UL1M7od7V0nzl2TIbWtITKczZvgsreTFN4lO5RDO3Av6ZeliSaonOdiHHtJ6sTp VRrzwpPnajM9P8Co+L2Lo9Y8WQIToQKEJQUog21EurKsJWJXmtlhbYIMb5SfFQoqfL71 dfB66V+cBDRvlT55wB+aOkbBMcu64Kez8+l7SWDMBANNvyX9fEBdVs4Jp5SXQEHkzCeR EQASBznCY8QK6zTJqcj5sc798i9Wyjxxyv8d/Q6KkAU5+X852Lzl2uvzJTZiMJwnH2Ds sSjg== Received: by 10.181.12.82 with SMTP id eo18mr19968247wid.2.1335685527973; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([178.239.26.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fn2sm29873329wib.0.2012.04.29.00.45.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> Subject: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code From: jasox To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:45:55 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) This bug report will be sent to the Bug-GNU-Emacs mailing list and the GNU bug tracker at debbugs.gnu.org. Please check that the From: line contains a valid email address. After a delay of up to one day, you should receive an acknowledgement at that address. Please write in English if possible, as the Emacs maintainers usually do not have translators for other languages. Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug, and the precise symptoms of the bug. If you can, give a recipe starting from `emacs -Q': If Emacs crashed, and you have the Emacs process in the gdb debugger, please include the output from the following gdb commands: `bt full' and `xbacktrace'. For information about debugging Emacs, please read the file /usr/share/emacs/24.1.50/etc/DEBUG. In GNU Emacs 24.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.1) of 2012-04-23 on zelenka, modified by Debian (emacs-snapshot package, version 2:20120423-1) Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11104000 Configured using: `configure '--build' 'x86_64-linux-gnu' '--host' 'x86_64-linux-gnu' '--prefix=/usr' '--sharedstatedir=/var/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/lib' '--localstatedir=/var' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-pop=yes' '--enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs-snapshot:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/24.1.50/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/24.1.50/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp' '--without-compress-info' '--with-crt-dir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/' '--with-x=yes' '--with-x-toolkit=gtk3' '--with-imagemagick=yes' 'build_alias=x86_64-linux-gnu' 'host_alias=x86_64-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-DDEBIAN -DSITELOAD_PURESIZE_EXTRA=5000 -g -O2'' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: en_US.utf8 value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: M-x r e p o r C-t C-y C-g M-x Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Making completion list... transpose-subr-1: Text is read-only Quit Mark set Quit Load-path shadows: I had problem with setting up pure white color as background, so I saw that background color before code is what is should be eg. #fdfdfd but, background color after code is #fcfcfc. Here is what I am talking about: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/809/emm.png From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 30 03:22:19 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2012 07:22:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOkw6-0007Bp-3q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 03:22:18 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33282 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOkw2-0007Bh-Km for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 03:22:16 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOkui-0002sK-29; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 03:20:52 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: jasox Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> X-Spook: number key Forte Centro Bruxelles anthrax ANC satellite X-Ran: 61wvkiU:H<-S.~5\{HApY_XBkRtB"A&aiuK9C4q{5VU-:mJAZA}*R=t#h4Rtl,3MdqH&;A X-Hue: magenta X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 03:20:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> (jasox's message of "Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:45:55 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 Cc: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) You don't need to include the bug report template in every mail. Just reply-to-all on this message. jasox wrote: > I had problem with setting up pure white color as background, so I saw > that background color before code is what is should be eg. #fdfdfd > but, background color after code is #fcfcfc. Here is what I am talking > about: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/809/emm.png I can't say that I see much in that image (except several active modes that are not part of Emacs), but I think I understand what you are saying is the issue now. Now tell me what you did to get Emacs into this state, preferably starting from `emacs -Q'. Ie, if I want to reproduce this for myself, precisely what do I have to do? Because if I just do `emacs -Q', the background looks uniformly white to me... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 30 13:31:44 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2012 17:31:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59169 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOuRr-0007If-RY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:31:44 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:43455 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOuRo-0007IW-LY for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:31:41 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOuQT-0007WC-QL for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:30:17 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <20382.52265.674859.917144@fencepost.gnu.org> Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:30:17 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org Bcc: rgm@gnu.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7fUKzoPwIlpndkh3c3iTv4EqwBECIn6ZSTvacdqrwpA=; b=Sep9Im180i0ase2xEg+MnUmBmsGHPrEVZN1Pb05TuCqnmtXDuq0/zid+GAsy4CKcvv C5iXZBmjXqHlV7t/c6NRRIBcT6Orc3kEOt9v925hwYM+6HmeWl7FWQj4ns5Usx+7dsba 2rjhH9KHDkQRHlZIfhkzQxn3o1X0VAUgpoShwvxQSDjgZutrY86D5Hk6rBIYQwh0WqbN jFwqolyNvfbdP4beNbrGKq963gh49DRH6nq5Ajdpwp/wPd3JSm6LjhYVlQLGyhxI65uQ aG0ikd58fXGcMB6rFoNFvsJAiY5M632+9EJ+mlQuZjOFFWaXIg4Ex/DmIeGkwp+CBQIJ 2yrA== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec50161e9b82f4204bee48ec2 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.212.41 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:26:02 +0200 From: jasox lispy To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code X-Bogosity: unsure, spamicity=0.176399, v1.2.1 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) --bcaec50161e9b82f4204bee48ec2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > You don't need to include the bug report template in every mail. > Just reply-to-all on this message. > > OK, thanks jasox wrote: > > > I had problem with setting up pure white color as background, so I saw > > that background color before code is what is should be eg. #fdfdfd > > but, background color after code is #fcfcfc. Here is what I am talking > > about: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/809/emm.png > > I can't say that I see much in that image (except several active modes > that are not part of Emacs), but I think I understand what you are > saying is the issue now. > > Now tell me what you did to get Emacs into this state, preferably > starting from `emacs -Q'. Ie, if I want to reproduce this for myself, > precisely what do I have to do? Because if I just do `emacs -Q', the > background looks uniformly white to me... > On picture I run Emacs in standard way, now I tested starting emacs with 'emacs -Q' and get same bug (it is not clear white color). Can you please use gimp or other color picker to test on your system. --bcaec50161e9b82f4204bee48ec2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

You don't need to include the bug report template in every mail.
Just reply-to-all on this message.

OK, thanks

jasox wrote:

> I had problem with setting up pure white color as background, so I saw
> that background color before code is what is should be eg. #fdfdfd
> but, background color after code is #fcfcfc. Here is what I am talking
> about: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/809/emm.png

I can't say that I see much in that image (except several active modes
that are not part of Emacs), but I think I understand what you are
saying is the issue now.

Now tell me what you did to get Emacs into this state, preferably
starting from `emacs -Q'. Ie, if I want to reproduce this for myself,
precisely what do I have to do? Because if I just do `emacs -Q', the
background looks uniformly white to me...
On picture I run Emacs in standard way, now I tested starting emacs with 'emacs -Q'
and get same bug (it is not clear white color). Can you please use gimp or other color
picker to test on your system.
--bcaec50161e9b82f4204bee48ec2-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 30 23:50:50 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2012 03:50:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SP46z-000531-RI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:50:50 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:52040 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SP46w-00052s-Tx for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:50:47 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SP45Y-000591-R6; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:49:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20383.23872.715362.528544@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:49:20 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: jasox lispy Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code In-Reply-To: References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 Cc: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Please keep the debbugs addressed cc'd. jasox lispy wrote (on Mon, 30 Apr 2012 at 14:26 +0200): > On picture I run Emacs in standard way, now I tested starting emacs > with 'emacs -Q' and get same bug (it is not clear white color). Can > you please use gimp or other color picker to test on your system. I tried on two different systems. The background is everywhere #FFFFFF, so I don't think I can help you. The last suggestion I have is that you send a minimal example file that shows the problem, and say precisely at what positions you see the different colours. Eg "at point 10, the bg is XXX, at point 100, the bg is YYY". From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 01 05:28:17 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2012 09:28:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60409 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SP9NY-00060F-Um for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 05:28:17 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]:52012) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SP9NW-000603-7o for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 05:28:14 -0400 Received: by vcbfo1 with SMTP id fo1so2683659vcb.3 for <11376@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 01 May 2012 02:26:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eOCy2yZrEN/xtGp9Al7jzS9KPFFbplNBDl2UWhdi6y8=; b=0LPzt8fqAlq8qv0MYgFQ7HUIyLHvAnwZwjLI3bR04nGeXTQS4NpiTOzQGND9ZUcCUu qu2H5UFwYNdsr9GL4wTsoN6YB+W+j7hkWiV/kMsQ7YCh7VwnUP83wHhCkcs8Mw6eNMaz sroqKUHpXxidkeUT0j6qmL+XH7Lk+iD915yyOdjZ0en9E8uW1ztWYx6ivxwe8GqjF+UE d5pago7UE78HGGwxw7KHv1BcrQ8FOSOzBTABbnRRPUJIIVBYziYDzwKnrNRcsdSKlqUW kkMIkQ8Zs1NaiGFlTgAkddOSmukVt3PcA/DyE9Hv3hAWBRH5I+1b8fEx76EsbxqdaCQy HpBw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.180.7 with SMTP id dk7mr12566856vdc.25.1335864402712; Tue, 01 May 2012 02:26:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.210.80 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2012 02:26:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20383.23872.715362.528544@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> <20383.23872.715362.528544@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 11:26:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code From: linkk lispy To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51965093116c004bef62bd8 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 Cc: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) --bcaec51965093116c004bef62bd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > > Please keep the debbugs addressed cc'd. > > ok > jasox lispy wrote (on Mon, 30 Apr 2012 at 14:26 +0200): > > > On picture I run Emacs in standard way, now I tested starting emacs > > with 'emacs -Q' and get same bug (it is not clear white color). Can > > you please use gimp or other color picker to test on your system. > > I tried on two different systems. The background is everywhere > #FFFFFF, so I don't think I can help you. > > The last suggestion I have is that you send a minimal example file > that shows the problem, and say precisely at what positions you see > the different colours. Eg "at point 10, the bg is XXX, at point 100, > the bg is YYY". > eg. (print "something") --bcaec51965093116c004bef62bd8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Glenn Mo= rris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:

Please keep the debbugs addressed cc'd.

ok=A0
jasox lispy wrote (on Mon, 30 Apr 2012 at 14:26 +0200):

> On picture I run Emacs in standard way, now I tested starting emacs > with 'emacs -Q' and get same bug (it is not clear white color)= . Can
> you please use gimp or other color picker to test on your system.

I tried on two different systems. The background is everywhere
#FFFFFF, so I don't think I can help you.

The last suggestion I have is that you send a minimal example file
that shows the problem, and say precisely at what positions you see
the different colours. Eg "at point 10, the bg is XXX, at point 100, the bg is YYY".
=A0
eg.

=
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 (print "something")


--bcaec51965093116c004bef62bd8-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 01 05:36:09 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2012 09:36:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60414 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SP9VA-0006Bb-Rr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 05:36:09 -0400 Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.212.44]:34018) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SP9V8-0006BC-W7 for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 05:36:07 -0400 Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so2680107vbb.3 for <11376@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 01 May 2012 02:34:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/Mmrx6knFdEM15bmlNI2WnVLfHzcJtnHSisi99Qh+Rw=; b=KDx10LvO4a+3PdVX8hmGQd6IMVvmdeGe36HSBJwWw2qbW/nBEZ2+5iOEtMpU6fU/Gd Lj94rKyPaMmPVnGLbr7T8QBsSOg1GT9Y2MvBebLfPVGgPHAA8mm7JdpkIiw4+tMKmbIm iDzy8YhnZ4YoekIE5Ba2c4eZ5B0vuvbzPGIod81/Q+KBDz0asN7+9RrW/JeJwPmQ2yTB kP0BFSs4ymVyPv33rD5H4p34yjj4YSHUKArZAV0XsH9SEZXWTBjGWpMTR2xUq5sz3No5 OavmnmhP39U41GkvZMYZVmAJSYt4AD4T1NvOFMyiOhFDueQ+1s1tGCK/AcyM2bYfDpjG BwWg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.150.14 with SMTP id w14mr16160177vcv.59.1335864875534; Tue, 01 May 2012 02:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.210.80 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2012 02:34:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> <20383.23872.715362.528544@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 11:34:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code From: linkk lispy To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c81cc5fc93304bef6472c X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 Cc: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) --f46d043c81cc5fc93304bef6472c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:26 AM, linkk lispy wrote: > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > >> >> Please keep the debbugs addressed cc'd. >> >> ok > >> jasox lispy wrote (on Mon, 30 Apr 2012 at 14:26 +0200): >> >> > On picture I run Emacs in standard way, now I tested starting emacs >> > with 'emacs -Q' and get same bug (it is not clear white color). Can >> > you please use gimp or other color picker to test on your system. >> >> I tried on two different systems. The background is everywhere >> #FFFFFF, so I don't think I can help you. >> >> The last suggestion I have is that you send a minimal example file >> that shows the problem, and say precisely at what positions you see >> the different colours. Eg "at point 10, the bg is XXX, at point 100, >> the bg is YYY". >> > > Last mail I send by mistake. Here is example (defparameter *v* (make-2d-array 24 3 '( (0.0 1 0) (-0.5 0 0.5) (0.5 0 0.5 ) #eg here# (0.0 1 0) (0.5 0 -0.5) (-0.5 0 -0.5) (0.0 1 0) (0.5 0 0.5) (0.5 0 -0.5) (jasox) (lispy) (0.0 -1 0) (0.5 0 -0.5) (-0.5 0 -0.5) (0.0 -1 0) (0.5 0 0.5) (0.5 0 -0.5) (0.0 -1 0) (-0.5 0 -0.5) (-0.5 0 0.5) ))) Space in from of eg. "(0.0 1 0) (-0.5 0 0.5) (0.5 0 0.5 ) #eg here#" use background #ffffff but after it is #fefefe, and that apply for all those code definitions, except space between: ;; #ffffff (jasox) ;; here color is #fefefe ;; and here is #ffffff (lispy) I hope so this is clear enough. --f46d043c81cc5fc93304bef6472c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:26 AM, linkk l= ispy <jasox.lispy@gmail.com> wrote:


On Tue, May 1, 2012 at= 5:49 AM, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:

Please keep the debbugs addressed cc'd.

ok=A0
jasox lispy wrote (on Mon, 30 Apr 2012 at 14:26 +0200):

> On picture I run Emacs in standard way, now I tested starting emacs > with 'emacs -Q' and get same bug (it is not clear white color)= . Can
> you please use gimp or other color picker to test on your system.

I tried on two different systems. The background is everywhere
#FFFFFF, so I don't think I can help you.

The last suggestion I have is that you send a minimal example file
that shows the problem, and say precisely at what positions you see
the different colours. Eg "at point 10, the bg is XXX, at point 100, the bg is YYY".
=A0
Last mail I send by mistake.
Here is example

(defparameter *v* (make-2d-array 24 3 '(
(0.= 0 1 0) (-0.5 0 0.5) (0.5 0 0.5 ) #eg here#=A0
(= 0.0 1 0) (0.5 0 -0.5) (-0.5 0 -0.5)
(0.0 1 0) (0.5 0 0.5) (0.5 0 -0.5)<= /div>
(= jasox)

(lispy)=A0
(0.0 -1 0) (0.5 0 -0.5) (-0.5 0 -0= .5)
(= 0.0 -1 0) (0.5 0 0.5) (0.5 0 -0.5)
(0.0 -1 0) (-0.5 0 -0.5) (-0.5 0 0.5= )
)= ))

Space in from of eg. "(0.0 1 0) (-0.= 5 0 0.5) (0.5 0 0.5 ) #eg here#"=A0use background #ffffff but after it= is #fefefe, and that apply for all those code definitions, except space be= tween:
;;=A0#ffffff =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0(jasox)
;; here color is #fefefe<= /div>
;; and here is #ffffff =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0(lispy)=A0

I hope so this is clear enough.
--f46d043c81cc5fc93304bef6472c-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 01 12:40:57 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2012 16:40:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60963 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPG8G-0002PM-UX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 12:40:57 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:34288 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPG8E-0002PE-40 for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 12:40:54 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPG6m-00077r-Tk; Tue, 01 May 2012 12:39:24 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: linkk lispy Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> <20383.23872.715362.528544@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spook: NATO import Ron Brown arrangements ANC hackers enemy of X-Ran: ZZQwu3NgRDMOY2\MC"?91YU^v$]cF2VEm%6XG X-Hue: magenta X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 12:39:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: (linkk lispy's message of "Tue, 1 May 2012 11:34:35 +0200") Message-ID: <748vhb6ekj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 Cc: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Thanks for the example. I still can't reproduce it, and really I have no idea how such a thing could happen, so I can't help. Does anyone else see this issue? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 01 15:26:14 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2012 19:26:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32914 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPIiD-0006Ba-O4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 15:26:14 -0400 Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.212.44]:59737) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPIiB-0006BO-L2 for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 15:26:12 -0400 Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so3025742vbb.3 for <11376@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 01 May 2012 12:24:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MUfTTPnVDiaT8g00uS8H/ewbmFrNkYFdgaMK7Z+Fpv0=; b=Y6mdXfV4kz3XPAnU2+tPlbG+3j5LGxgRnCCS2pQd4/rhX7mAz1O9Ev3j5T0gEG5ysI eX3sgQ01RB1TTKmFblNSRaiXewIV9CJJd+qHG1zLMeB+rKbRads0+qilkCJIEvva4vDI 66QmELPI/d0SUacNtzI8t8/aBZ0i7rPm1zzo317obd9/jxmqyg1MSxNFLaHqBxdnCvlA dvBjXQD+JgmaQHmWzN+tdT89QwdOsp//IRCeCgBC8rw2JLqEAlZ7AXwi5RJltj6cu0Xf 6o/dR9XbvDhN5w7djjHBkfVVBDPFmjdWV8qlPi+NNo42Q0wSr5BPixFIdexslviTBDBa XB7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.67.203 with SMTP id p11mr22233292vdt.13.1335900277678; Tue, 01 May 2012 12:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.210.80 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2012 12:24:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <748vhb6ekj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> <20383.23872.715362.528544@fencepost.gnu.org> <748vhb6ekj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 21:24:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code From: linkk lispy To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f32f081a33604befe8516 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 Cc: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) --20cf307f32f081a33604befe8516 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > > Thanks for the example. I still can't reproduce it, and really I have no > idea how such a thing could happen, so I can't help. > > Does anyone else see this issue? > Yeah, I asked on IRC does anyone have same problem, and one guy said that he has. I am going again to see on my another comp (ubuntu 12.04), right now I am running Debian testing. What OS (linux disto) are you using ? --20cf307f32f081a33604befe8516 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Glenn Mo= rris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:

Thanks for the example. I still can't reproduce it, and really I have n= o
idea how such a thing could happen, so I can't help.

Does anyone else see this issue?
=A0
Yeah, = I asked on IRC does anyone have same problem, and one guy said that he has.= I am going again to see on my another comp (ubuntu 12.04), right now I am = running Debian testing.=A0What OS (linux disto) are you using ? --20cf307f32f081a33604befe8516-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 01 15:29:32 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2012 19:29:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32922 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPIlP-0006Gj-8S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 15:29:32 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:36873 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPIlM-0006GW-1P for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 15:29:29 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPIjt-0008LJ-JX; Tue, 01 May 2012 15:27:57 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: linkk lispy Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> <20383.23872.715362.528544@fencepost.gnu.org> <748vhb6ekj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spook: David John Oates COSCO Kh-11 brigand Gazprom asset TELINT X-Ran: G)sSlGc^S.I*E`G.p7Tmul%":NR;D8RZZ)ZQ,+ih;gpd}!BsK-qU{/kj0sV5V&nvt@aeVE X-Hue: white X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 15:27:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: (linkk lispy's message of "Tue, 1 May 2012 21:24:37 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 Cc: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) linkk lispy wrote: > Yeah, I asked on IRC does anyone have same problem, and one guy said that > he has. I am going again to see on my another comp (ubuntu 12.04), right > now I am running Debian testing. What OS (linux disto) are you using ? I tried on Debian testing and RHEL6. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 01 16:18:24 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2012 20:18:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32933 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPJWi-0007Lp-3r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 16:18:24 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]:61048) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPJWR-0007LK-Lv for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 16:18:22 -0400 Received: by vcbfo1 with SMTP id fo1so3064663vcb.3 for <11376@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 01 May 2012 13:16:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=aygc2+noscfkxKIqB08xx+Cjq6BhZMOxlPi5K2+DH28=; b=P53pvJDQ1QrKTO9OZnCww7ecfrE1kT417RzHGFu67H3QiX4W4t63RYmljAY2V1Hq/7 5r2o7xKwJCYIGD4CTixSsu6kOv6Kz7KOOzDydc5rMUyeYZIFZ0+MEowEF+wb/W+H2nyT R2W8Ig3C9gv7gsV3LZcGe4u5GdXa+Lfrg7oVK9s4s66NSEu5Cp5voCjWmT8GEUp283Ls N5UVzQEfPQtocH04cAXx39s7FHxQixuSS3CY7Gv7rQS0/U5UfJ95ke/my/Ib6brxp/yd Uf6MCEP1galVAaMG9rNMtyA50Mgn7UPeyTDbk5eYqU5pqysRT0WmH3JvgSAxY7EHMHcU s/ZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.73.102 with SMTP id k6mr18825396vdv.57.1335903393424; Tue, 01 May 2012 13:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.210.80 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2012 13:16:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> <20383.23872.715362.528544@fencepost.gnu.org> <748vhb6ekj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 22:16:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code From: linkk lispy To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec501c5b03825b004beff3f29 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 Cc: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) --bcaec501c5b03825b004beff3f29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > linkk lispy wrote: > > > Yeah, I asked on IRC does anyone have same problem, and one guy said that > > he has. I am going again to see on my another comp (ubuntu 12.04), right > > now I am running Debian testing. What OS (linux disto) are you using ? > > I tried on Debian testing and RHEL6. > Just tested on latest ubuntu, and with emacs 23, and have no problem with background :S. Dunno it can be because of some toolkit. --bcaec501c5b03825b004beff3f29 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Glenn Mo= rris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:
linkk lispy wrote:

> Yeah, I asked on IRC does anyone have same problem, and one guy said t= hat
> he has. I am going again to see on my another comp (ubuntu 12.04), rig= ht
> now I am running Debian testing. What OS (linux disto) are you using ?=

I tried on Debian testing and RHEL6.

Just tested on latest ubuntu, and with emacs 23= , and have no problem with background :S. Dunno it can be because of some t= oolkit.
--bcaec501c5b03825b004beff3f29-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 03 12:07:20 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2012 16:07:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35080 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPyYq-0002eu-2K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 12:07:20 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]:39777 helo=mail-vx0-f172.google.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPyYn-0002ee-IV for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 12:07:18 -0400 Received: by vcbfo1 with SMTP id fo1so1419948vcb.3 for <11376@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 03 May 2012 09:05:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4Vj5NQLONxbQrh65uRWjJBnbAcxsW/2Yr8RKzviVW6Y=; b=RBOv1ny0PNx7kcGmHzn3NbbQOMQ7YcGq3kvm8oG4YV8J/rH8xgTH4HKSbzgYMVAFUj zThOqxyUeNeXFKJZrDrqR8jwMtzLoxDb0NljUE0nYkrGhX/cxeD+aqa8aD8iuyevEycX aX3n9D/JUV4He+hIm1FaDwhtCuEJUU56fGSik7IBcREKT+eXdHKh3lS11q3CRbEuWhd/ drPBhF0ZJ2d+rqYMNE8oy6QwOrQ+9eUxXeIquVuCf8HbePZNpiqIxxw4KiiCfNXkV57C qeTSZJSLYx7APwUhHaYN/ZcSaMUaeHX+uNNd9KOSbmG8u+3Xcgw5dVALw/1pQgJVn1QZ i87w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.29.243 with SMTP id n19mr730191vdh.94.1336061132864; Thu, 03 May 2012 09:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.210.80 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2012 09:05:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> <20383.23872.715362.528544@fencepost.gnu.org> <748vhb6ekj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 18:05:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code From: linkk lispy To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f322638fd6004bf23f922 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 Cc: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) --20cf307f322638fd6004bf23f922 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:16 PM, linkk lispy wrote: > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > >> linkk lispy wrote: >> >> > Yeah, I asked on IRC does anyone have same problem, and one guy said >> that >> > he has. I am going again to see on my another comp (ubuntu 12.04), right >> > now I am running Debian testing. What OS (linux disto) are you using ? >> >> I tried on Debian testing and RHEL6. >> > > Just tested on latest ubuntu, and with emacs 23, and have no problem with > background :S. Dunno it can be because of some toolkit. > Today I installed emacs 23 (It use to be 24) on fresh debian testing, and background is the same in front and after code. Thanks for your time Glenn. --20cf307f322638fd6004bf23f922 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:16 PM, linkk lispy <jasox.lispy@gmail.com> wrote:


= On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:=
linkk lispy wrote:

> Yeah, I asked on IRC does anyone have same problem, and one guy said t= hat
> he has. I am going again to see on my another comp (ubuntu 12.04), rig= ht
> now I am running Debian testing. What OS (linux disto) are you using ?=

I tried on Debian testing and RHEL6.

Just tested on latest ubuntu, and w= ith emacs 23, and have no problem with background :S. Dunno it can be becau= se of some toolkit.

Today I installed emacs 23 (It use to be 24) on= fresh debian testing, and background is the same in front and after code.<= /div>
Thanks for your time Glenn.

--20cf307f322638fd6004bf23f922-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 04 14:17:33 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2012 18:17:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36332 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SQN4O-0008GX-TE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 14:17:33 -0400 Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.212.44]:38878) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SQN4K-0008GJ-Q0 for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 14:17:30 -0400 Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so2263654vbb.3 for <11376@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 May 2012 11:15:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=E01cMvDs/rFHNsC4HjE08ibZBS8FHAq+0aBUnDSRBqY=; b=pj85mHiD7HzT1W5dAcYn3+TXkNnv93I0na7g1Z8tWsPLdU+EnOfWexGDzd/BMnhHEj zSu61QQd9BqX0lmkVFVd1r5uvDHwQW2JZ2iZ/++Q/z0G/QHAIQUEwf4EIsBsDWZBbXEr axG9pOChQ+ZQ97R7JeJbVE+i3DQypgZ1cjdM3bN6rsBboasjy59XRmeYkNHh/xBnaSbC abCIWhQWgTEFnlch6Zje3pmL7McSz+gnG8PRHqU0b2VFpiQmvJfDCytOSjjnNAtgEdH3 3NP+uDJWI30pFOksh3G+n0I5rvgX3rxrio8fa8K46r4MvjGJJ90qGbIVXMGMEnQ6yNOJ bAIw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.67.199 with SMTP id p7mr2640645vdt.75.1336155337957; Fri, 04 May 2012 11:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.210.80 with HTTP; Fri, 4 May 2012 11:15:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> <20383.23872.715362.528544@fencepost.gnu.org> <748vhb6ekj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 20:15:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code From: linkk lispy To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307abcdd48a0ec04bf39e8ec X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 Cc: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) --20cf307abcdd48a0ec04bf39e8ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > linkk lispy wrote: > > > Yeah, I asked on IRC does anyone have same problem, and one guy said that > > he has. I am going again to see on my another comp (ubuntu 12.04), right > > now I am running Debian testing. What OS (linux disto) are you using ? > > I tried on Debian testing and RHEL6. > Sorry Glenn one more question, are you using emacs 24 in debian testing and RHEL6. --20cf307abcdd48a0ec04bf39e8ec Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Glenn Mo= rris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:
linkk lispy wrote:

> Yeah, I asked on IRC does anyone have same problem, and one guy said t= hat
> he has. I am going again to see on my another comp (ubuntu 12.04), rig= ht
> now I am running Debian testing. What OS (linux disto) are you using ?=

I tried on Debian testing and RHEL6.
=A0
Sorry Glenn one more question, are you using emacs 24 in debian =A0test= ing and RHEL6. --20cf307abcdd48a0ec04bf39e8ec-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 05 15:48:08 2012 Received: (at 11376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2012 19:48:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37415 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SQkxc-0003Sb-EX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 15:48:08 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:47850 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SQkxX-0003SR-8O for 11376@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 15:48:07 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQkvh-0003D9-JA; Sat, 05 May 2012 15:46:09 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: linkk lispy Subject: Re: bug#11376: 24.1.50; Different background color before and after code References: <1335641794.27137.1.camel@jasox> <1335685555.30939.0.camel@jasox> <20383.23872.715362.528544@fencepost.gnu.org> <748vhb6ekj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spook: fissionable AMW CESID Baranyi Ceridian Aladdin fraud S Box X-Ran: 9(G;ajZ>ohs{u&|`'5uHdJmov.FX%a$8+W{X3!j_ILv+c}/pa:H@s]1A,Hr~@=3gVTsZ5H X-Hue: green X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 15:46:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: (linkk lispy's message of "Fri, 4 May 2012 20:15:37 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11376 Cc: 11376@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) linkk lispy wrote: > Sorry Glenn one more question, are you using emacs 24 in debian testing > and RHEL6. I tried 23.4, 24.0.96, and current trunk. Not reproducible on any. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 12 16:39:05 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2012 21:39:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39553 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tiu1A-0001Cu-Qb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:39:05 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:46330) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tiu16-0001CU-SO for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:39:02 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tiu0K-0004oz-7Y for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:38:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:38:12 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 11376 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) close 11376 From unknown Fri Aug 15 16:18:32 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator